Trump finds some support in blue DC for police takeover: ‘I feel safer’
The article discusses President Donald Trump’s federal takeover of Washington D.C.’s Metropolitan Police Department, involving the deployment of National Guard troops to address violent crime and homelessness in the city. Troops arrived at the D.C. armory as part of this initiative, which also includes measures requiring homeless individuals to accept shelter or treatment or face jail time to clean up the streets. The move has sparked mixed reactions among D.C. residents. some, like Melanie Splendora, expressed relief and a sense of increased safety due to rising crime, while others, such as Shashank Bharadwaj and Axol Campo, criticized the takeover as unneeded or a dangerous overreach, citing concerns about militarization, civil rights, and the displacement of vulnerable populations. Despite the city’s strong Democratic leanings-where trump received minimal voter support-the federal government retains authority over D.C., providing Trump with legal grounds for the intervention. the takeover has ignited debate about law enforcement, public safety, and governance in the nation’s capital.
Trump’s takeover of blue DC met with praise and rage by fed-up residents
Washington D.C. residents are preparing for a federal takeover of local law enforcement as National Guard troops made their way to the District Tuesday morning.
The first troops arrived at the D.C. Armory, located roughly two miles east of the United States Capitol building, early in the morning and continued streaming in throughout the day.
President Donald Trump announced the takeover on Monday, saying he would activate hundreds of troops and take over the Metropolitan Police Department in order to address violent crime.
Trump is also targeting homelessness, with the White House saying homeless people must accept shelter, mental health, or addiction treatment, or face jail time to clean up the city’s streets, both for locals and for tourists visiting the Nation’s capital.
It’s a lot to take in for a city that voted 90.3% for Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris in last fall’s election. By contrast, just 6.5% of D.C. voters, 21,076 people in a city of over 700,000, pulled the lever for Trump.
However, the district remains a federally controlled entity. Trump is likely on solid legal ground to make the move thanks to the power granted to him by 77 million voters in other parts of the country.
As the troops arrived Tuesday, D.C. residents who spoke to the Washington Examiner shared a variety of reactions ranging from support for the president’s actions to horror at the prospect of being sent to a concentration camp.
Melanie Splendora, who has lived in the District since 2011, was glad to hear it.
“I feel safer. It’s terrible here,” Splendora said during an interview near her residence on Thomas Circle, just two blocks from the scene of a fatal shooting that took place Monday night.
Splendora added that she’d witnessed groups of teenagers stealing from a nearby CVS more than once, though she said she herself was not targeted.
“Security doesn’t do anything because they’re in a big group, and then they go cursing and being rude to the people in the stores,” she said. “They think they can do whatever they want because they feel like they’re in control of the situation, and they just run off. No one is going to say something.”
Splendora no longer goes out at night out of fear, and cited comments from D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser acknowledging that more law enforcement presence in local neighborhoods may be positive in fighting crime.
But Splendora is likely in the minority of local opinion.
Shashank Bharadwaj, who also lives near Thomas Circle, doesn’t feel the takeover is needed.
“I’m worried about it encroaching on D.C.,” Bharadwaj said while walking his dog. “There’s no reason for their presence. Crime rates are down, so I don’t see any good reason to justify it.”
Bharadwaj hopes the deployment is as short as possible and said he does feel safe walking city streets.
“That’s the problem with D.C., right?” said Bharadwaj, who has lived in Washington since 2022. “We don’t really have representation at the federal level, so there’s only so much [the city council] can do. It seems like Trump is allowed to just nationalize or federalize the city and take over the police department.”
New OPM director takes gentler approach to streamlining the federal bureaucracy
A third D.C. local, Axol Campo, also opposes the move, though in far stronger terms.
“I’m a non-binary person that is a D.C. resident,” Campo said. “I also have a last name that’s not traditionally white, so if I get stopped in the wrong area, I could get sent off to a concentration camp or sent to another country or disappeared.”
Campo, who lives in the northern part of the city, described the deployment as a “complete fascist overreach” and was concerned because, “I don’t know where these Gestapo are going to pop up.”
For Campo, who has lived in Washington for 10 years, a lack of police on the streets beats the threat of a militarized force, and the plans to remove homeless people from the streets are also a concern.
“I feel safe when there are unhoused people, because where the f*** are they going to go?” Campo said. As for Mayor Bowser, Campo wishes she would be much more aggressive in her interactions with the president and Washington’s police force.
“Stand the f*** up,” Campo said. “She, for years, has been offering bigger bonuses to police, while choosing not to fund things that would actually support the community.”
Campo declined to be photographed, citing safety concerns.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."