NY judge accuses Trump attorney of ‘misogyny’ over law clerk comment.
Former President Donald Trump’s Civil Business Trial Ends with Judge’s Warning
The civil business trial involving former President Donald Trump concluded with a dramatic exchange between the judge and Trump’s attorney, Christopher Kise. Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron issued a stern warning against Kise’s “misogyny” after a court clerk accused him of bias.
“Do not refer to my staff again,” Justice Engoron firmly told Kise during the testimony of Eric Trump, the former president’s son.
Engoron, who is presiding over the fraud trial against the Trump Organization, had previously issued a gag order prohibiting Donald Trump and the parties involved from making comments about his staff. Trump has already been fined $15,000 for two violations and has been cautioned about facing stricter consequences in the future.
“Sometimes I think there’s a bit of misogyny in you referring to my female principal law clerk,” the judge suggested. “She’s a civil servant.”
Trump’s attorney, Alina Habba, defended Kise, stating that misogyny was not the issue. Habba explained that Kise’s swipe at the clerk was due to her frequent passing of notes to Engoron during the proceedings. The judge pointed out that Trump’s attorneys also passed notes to each other.
“I have the right to make points on the record,” Kise argued. “If there is bias in the proceedings, I have the right to raise that.”
Engoron emphasized the importance of his staff’s safety and his right to seek advice from his principal law clerk. He dismissed Kise’s points, stating, “Your points are not well taken.”
The day’s proceedings included testimony from Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, with the latter denying involvement in the financial statements of his father’s company despite holding a central role.
The trial, expected to continue until mid-December, focuses on remaining allegations and will determine whether Donald Trump will be required to pay $250 million in damages.
Aside from this trial, Donald Trump is facing legal proceedings across the country, including state court hearings in Colorado and Minnesota regarding his eligibility to appear on primary election ballots. Additionally, there are ongoing federal criminal cases led by special counsel Jack Smith.
Looking ahead, jury selection for Trump’s trial on charges of seeking to subvert the 2020 election results is scheduled to begin on February 9 in Washington, D.C. The trial itself is set to commence on March 4, just before Super Tuesday.
Donald Trump has pleaded not guilty to the charges in both federal cases and the state charges in New York and Georgia.
What are the potential consequences for Donald Trump, the Trump Organization, and the broader perception of accountability and justice if found guilty in this civil business trial
Ned that further violations will result in more severe consequences, including potential jail time. The tension between the judge and Trump’s attorney, however, reached a boiling point during Eric Trump’s testimony.
The exchange occurred when a court clerk accused Kise of bias, alleging that he made derogatory remarks about her gender. This accusation undermined the fairness and impartiality of the trial, prompting Justice Engoron to intervene. The judge’s warning to Kise serves as a reminder that decorum and respect must be maintained within the courtroom.
The civil business trial, which began in November 2021, revolves around allegations of fraudulent practices committed by the Trump Organization. The charges include inflating property values to secure loans and tax benefits. The trial has received significant media attention, as it puts Donald Trump’s business practices under scrutiny.
Throughout the trial, both the prosecution and the defense presented their arguments, called witnesses, and provided evidence. The testimonies of key figures, including Eric Trump, have been pivotal in establishing the facts and determining the truth behind the allegations.
Whilst the trial remains ongoing and a formal verdict has yet to be reached, this recent incident serves as a reminder of the wider implications surrounding the trial. Criticism has arisen regarding the behavior of Donald Trump’s legal team and their approach to the trial process. The judge’s warning highlights the importance of maintaining professionalism and respect, regardless of the nature or intensity of the proceedings.
The outcome of this civil business trial carries significant consequences not only for Donald Trump but also for the Trump Organization and its business practices. If found guilty, it could tarnish the legacy of the former president and impact the reputation of his organization. Moreover, the trial serves as a test of the American legal system’s ability to hold powerful figures accountable.
As the trial concludes, the judge’s warning is a clear message to all involved that personal attacks, bias, and disrespect will not be tolerated within the courtroom. The American justice system prides itself on upholding fair and impartial trials, and incidents such as this one highlight the necessity of adhering to these principles.
In the coming days, the judge will consider all the evidence presented and will make a decision based on the facts and the law. The verdict will have significant implications, not only for Donald Trump and the Trump Organization but also for the broader perception of accountability and justice in the United States.
Regardless of the outcome, this civil business trial represents a critical moment in American legal history. It serves as a reminder that no one, regardless of their stature or position, is above the law. It underscores the importance of transparency, fairness, and respect within the judicial system, and the responsibility of legal professionals to uphold these principles.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
