Tolkien Estate triumphs, halts fan-made sequel and series
The Tolkien Estate Wins Lawsuit Against Fan Claiming to Have Written Sequel to “Lord of the Rings”
The estate of the late J.R.R. Tolkien, author of “Lord of the Rings,” has emerged victorious in a legal battle against a fan who boldly asserted to have penned the “perfect sequel” to the beloved fantasy trilogy, as reported by The New York Times.
U.S. District Judge Stephen V. Wilson, presiding over the Central District of California, recently ruled in favor of the Tolkien Estate, stating that the author, Demetrious Polychron, had violated copyright laws by infringing on the estate’s intellectual property. The judge ordered all physical and digital copies of Polychron’s work to be destroyed.
The clash between Polychron and the Tolkien Estate commenced six years ago when the aspiring writer sent a digital and physical copy of his book, titled “The Fellowship of the King,” to Simon Tolkien, the original author’s grandson. In a letter accompanying the book, Polychron explained that he felt compelled to write the would-be sequel and strived to remain faithful to the original canon.
However, Judge Wilson’s ruling suggested that Polychron may have adhered a bit too closely to the original material, as he discovered ”direct evidence of copying.” According to The New York Times, the book featured prominent characters from “Lord of the Rings,” including Samwise Gamgee, Aragorn, and Sauron. Additionally, at least 15 poems or passages from the trilogy were verbatim copies, and numerous settings from the original books were meticulously described. The judge also noted the duplication of a central plot and structure, among other copied elements.
Despite being denied a license by the estate to create sequels or extensions to Tolkien’s work, Polychron proceeded to self-publish his book. When the Tolkien Estate became aware of this development in March 2023, they promptly sent Polychron a cease and desist letter in an attempt to halt his unauthorized publication.
One month later, Polychron retaliated by filing a $250 million lawsuit against the Tolkien Estate and Amazon, alleging that the Amazon Prime series “The Rings of Power” had plagiarized material from his book. However, Judge Wilson dismissed Polychron’s lawsuit and ordered him to pay $134,000 in attorneys’ fees to both Amazon and the Tolkien Estate. Furthermore, the judge affirmed that Polychron’s book indeed violated the estate’s copyright protections.
“This case involved a serious infringement of The Lord of the Rings copyright, undertaken on a commercial basis,” stated Steven Maier, attorney for the Tolkien Estate. “The estate hopes that the award of a permanent injunction and attorneys’ fees will be sufficient to dissuade others who may have similar intentions.”
Sources:
CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP
What were the reasons behind the Tolkien Estate’s lawsuit against fan author Demetrious Polychron?
Ron, embarking on a new adventure in Middle-earth. It also incorporated familiar places such as the Shire and Rivendell, further blurring the line between Polychron’s work and Tolkien’s original creations.
The Tolkien Estate swiftly took action, filing a lawsuit against Polychron for copyright infringement. The estate, responsible for safeguarding the rich legacy of J.R.R. Tolkien’s works, argued that Polychron’s book exploited the original characters, settings, and storylines that were the intellectual property of the Tolkien family. The estate saw the fan’s endeavor as a blatant attempt to profit from the success and popularity of the “Lord of the Rings” franchise without acquiring the necessary permission.
During the court proceedings, Polychron stood by his belief that he had not violated any copyright laws. He maintained that his work paid homage to Tolkien’s universe and contributed to its ongoing mythology. According to Polychron, he had poured countless hours into studying Tolkien’s writings, ensuring that his sequel remained consistent with the established lore.
However, Judge Wilson articulated a different viewpoint, declaring that a substantial portion of Polychron’s book constituted “unauthorized derivative works.” Wilson found that Polychron had copied significant elements from Tolkien’s original writings, such as language patterns, character traits, and even specific phrases. The judge asserted that this level of similarity was beyond an acceptable homage and amounted to copyright infringement.
The implications of this ruling extend beyond the individual case of Polychron and his work. It reinforces the notion that fan fiction, even when created with the utmost admiration and respect, must be mindful of copyright laws and respect the boundaries established by the original authors or their estates. It underscores the importance of seeking permission before appropriating copyrighted works for personal or commercial gain.
For loyal fans of J.R.R. Tolkien’s world, the ruling by Judge Wilson serves as a reminder of the meticulousness required when venturing into the realm of fan creations. While fan fiction can be a powerful tool for furthering the enjoyment and exploration of beloved universes, it is essential to tread carefully and adhere to legal boundaries. The Tolkien Estate’s victory in this legal battle exemplifies the commitment to preserving the integrity of J.R.R. Tolkien’s works and ensures that future fan creations respect the labor and creativity that went into constructing the original canon.
In conclusion, the recent legal victory of the Tolkien Estate against fan author Demetrious Polychron serves to highlight the significance of copyright laws in safeguarding the intellectual property of authors and their estates. It reinforces the need for fans and aspiring authors to be mindful of these boundaries while paying homage to beloved works. As the world of fan fiction continues to flourish, this ruling sets a precedent that encourages a respectful and legally compliant approach to fan creations, ultimately preserving the legacy of iconic literary works for generations to come.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
