Three out of five claims in civil lawsuit over Jan. 6 officer death against Trump dismissed
Three Claims Dismissed in Lawsuit Against Trump and Jan. 6 Rioters
Capitol Police Officer’s Lawsuit Sees Setback
Three out of five claims in a civil lawsuit filed against former President Donald Trump and the Jan. 6 rioters, Julian Khater and George Tanios, have been dismissed. This lawsuit was brought forth by Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick’s partner, Sandra Garza, who made several allegations including conspiracy to violate civil rights and negligence per se based on D.C.’s anti-riot law.
However, U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta has ruled in favor of the defendants, dismissing the wrongful death and negligence per se counts. In his court filing, Mehta stated that Garza lacks the statutory standing to make a wrongful death claim. He also cited precedent to dismiss one of the counts, explaining that D.C.’s anti-riot law does not support a claim of negligence per se.
This is an ongoing story and will be updated as new information becomes available.
What were the accusations made by Sandra Garza in her lawsuit against former President Donald Trump and the individuals involved in the January 6th Capitol riot?
In a recent development, three out of five claims in a civil lawsuit lodged against former President Donald Trump and the individuals involved in the January 6th Capitol riot, namely Julian Khater and George Tanios, have been dismissed. The lawsuit was initiated by Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick’s partner, Sandra Garza, who made various accusations, including conspiracy to violate civil rights and negligence per se based on Washington D.C.’s anti-riot law.
However, U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta has ruled in favor of the defendants, leading to the dismissal of the wrongful death and negligence per se allegations. Mehta clarified in his court filing that Garza lacks the necessary statutory standing to bring a wrongful death claim. Furthermore, he referred to legal precedent to explain the dismissal of one of the counts, stating that D.C.’s anti-riot law does not support a claim of negligence per se.
It is important to note that this is an ongoing story, and further updates will be provided as new information becomes available.
Overall, this ruling represents a setback for Officer Sicknick’s partner in her pursuit of justice and accountability for the events that unfolded on January 6th. Nevertheless, it is crucial to respect the legal process and allow all parties involved to present their arguments and evidence. As the case progresses, it will be interesting to see how it unfolds and whether any other claims are dismissed or upheld.
The January 6th Capitol riot was an unprecedented event that shook the United States to its core, and it is understandable that individuals affected by the events seek legal recourse. This lawsuit, in particular, serves as a reminder of the lasting impact and consequences of that fateful day.
In the midst of ongoing investigations and legal battles surrounding the January 6th riot, it is essential to maintain a balanced perspective and remember the principles of justice, fairness, and respect for the rule of law. The courts play a crucial role in ensuring accountability and upholding the rights of all parties involved. As such, it is imperative to await the outcome of these proceedings and the ensuing legal judgments.
The dismissal of three claims in this lawsuit against former President Trump and the Jan. 6 rioters marks a significant development in the legal landscape surrounding the events of that day. It underscores the complexities and challenges involved in seeking legal redress for the chaos and violence that unfolded at the Capitol.
As the case moves forward, it will undoubtedly continue to garner attention and shape public discourse. It is the duty of the legal system to meticulously examine the facts, consider all arguments, and ultimately deliver a fair and just verdict. Society must remain vigilant in ensuring accountability for all those involved in the Jan. 6 riot and strive for a greater understanding of the events that transpired.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
