Red Cross urges consideration for Palestinian perspective in Israeli Hamas hostage case
The Red Cross Faces Criticism for Treatment of Israeli Hostage
In a shocking incident, the Red Cross has come under fire for scolding Israeli parents who desperately sought to deliver medication to their daughter, still held captive by Hamas terrorists in Gaza. The parents were met with a surprising response from the humanitarian organization, who urged them to consider the plight of the Palestinians.
Attorney Marina Medvin took to X to share the disturbing account, revealing that the Red Cross representatives reprimanded the parents when they requested assistance in transferring prescription medication to their child. “The Red Cross told them they needed to ‘think about the Palestinian side. It’s hard for the Palestinians, they’re being bombed,'” Medvin disclosed. Shockingly, the Red Cross refused to facilitate the transfer of medication to the Israeli hostage.
The mother expressed her disappointment, stating, “We left there as we entered: without new information, without something new, and with disappointment.”
Medvin also shed light on the dire situation faced by the hostage, Doron Steinbrecher, a 30-year-old veterinarian nurse who has been held captive for 63 days without access to her vital prescription medication.
The parents of an Israeli being held hostage by Hamas were reprimanded by representatives of the Red Cross after they tried to ask the Red Cross to transfer prescription medication to their child. The Red Cross told them they needed to “think about the Palestinian side. It’s hard… pic.twitter.com/CrtHLKRzZf
— Marina Medvin 🇺🇸 (@MarinaMedvin) December 8, 2023
The full story was published by The Jerusalem Post, revealing the heart-wrenching moment when Steinbrecher’s parents, Roni and Simona, were invited to meet with the Red Cross. They had hoped that the meeting would lead to the delivery of medication for their daughter.
Earlier this week, eight former hostages, who were released during the temporary ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, penned a letter urging the Red Cross to intervene and visit the remaining hostages. In the letter, they detailed the appalling conditions they endured, including a lack of medical treatment, severe food shortages, and unsanitary living conditions.
Israeli officials estimate that over 130 hostages are still held in Gaza, but their current conditions remain unknown.
What implications does the prioritization of political considerations over immediate needs have on the Red Cross’ humanitarian work and commitment to impartiality?
.
This incident has sparked widespread criticism and raised concerns about the neutrality and professionalism of the Red Cross in dealing with hostage situations. The organization, which is known for its humanitarian work and commitment to impartiality, has been accused of prioritizing political considerations over providing assistance to those in need.
The Israeli parents’ plea for help should have been met with empathy and support, as they were facing an unimaginable ordeal of having their child held captive by a terrorist group. Instead, they were met with an insensitive response from the Red Cross, who seemed to be more concerned with the political situation in the region than with the immediate needs of an innocent child.
The role of the Red Cross is to provide assistance and support to those affected by armed conflicts, while remaining neutral and impartial. This incident raises questions about whether the organization is adhering to its guiding principles and fulfilling its mandate effectively.
Critics argue that by prioritizing the “plight of the Palestinians,” the Red Cross is not only failing to provide assistance to Israeli hostages but also deviating from its core mission of providing humanitarian aid to all those in need, regardless of political affiliations. The organization’s response has been perceived as taking sides in a complex political conflict, rather than focusing solely on the well-being of the hostage and ensuring their safety and medical care.
Furthermore, the incident highlights a double standard in the Red Cross’ approach towards Israeli and Palestinian victims. While it is essential to recognize and address the suffering of the Palestinian people, it is equally important to acknowledge the rights and needs of Israeli citizens, especially in situations where their lives are at risk.
The Red Cross has a responsibility to demonstrate transparency and accountability for its actions. In light of this incident, individuals and organizations have called for a thorough investigation into the organization’s handling of the situation and its adherence to its principles of neutrality and impartiality.
While the Red Cross has a long history of providing assistance in various conflict zones around the world, this incident highlights the need for greater scrutiny and oversight to ensure that it remains committed to its core humanitarian values. It is imperative that the organization takes this criticism seriously and takes steps to restore confidence in its ability to fulfill its mission to provide aid to those in need, regardless of their nationality or political situation.
As the story of this disturbing incident continues to circulate, it serves as a reminder that even organizations with the noblest of intentions can falter and stray from their principles. It is only through constant evaluation, accountability, and a commitment to impartiality that humanitarian organizations can truly fulfill their mission in providing aid and support to those in dire need, regardless of the circumstances.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
