Texas Passed A Bathroom Bill With Zero Corporate Shakedowns
The Texas legislature recently succeeded in passing the Texas Women’s Privacy Act, commonly known as a “bathroom bill,” which restricts bathroom access in government buildings, schools, and universities based on sex assigned at birth. Unlike similar legislation in other states, Texas’s bill faced minimal public or corporate opposition. This contrasts sharply with the backlash against North Carolina’s 2016 House Bill 2, which led to important economic consequences due to corporate boycotts and event relocations. In 2017, Texas’s own similar attempt was stopped by tech companies and lawmakers citing concerns about discrimination.Though, by 2025, major corporations like IBM and others remained silent, reflecting a shift in public opinion that has grown more supportive of bathroom restrictions. The rise in support is attributed to the expansion of transgender-related issues into many sex-segregated spaces and controversies surrounding men participating in women’s sports and other protected areas. Critics argue that previous fears about transgender individuals have proven exaggerated and highlight increased incidents of assaults in women-only spaces. the article suggests businesses now avoid defending transgender rights in this context to protect their reputations, allowing conservative legislation like the Texas Women’s Privacy Act to pass with little resistance.
After nearly a decade of failed attempts, the Texas legislature finally passed a “bathroom bill” this week, securing a conservative win as lawmakers closed out a second overtime special session. The Texas Women’s Privacy Act restricts bathroom use in government buildings, schools, and universities according to sex assigned at birth, with steep fines up to $125,000 for violations. But what’s notably different about the passage of this bill in Texas and 18 other states where similar legislation has passed is what little public or corporate backlash accompanied it. Almost none, comparatively.
Let’s take a time machine back to 2016. Recall the reaction to North Carolina’s House Bill 2 that year, which similarly mandated bathroom use based on sex at birth. It triggered massive outrage, including corporate boycotts from companies like PayPal, which canceled a $3.6 million expansion; Deutsche Bank, which paused plans to add 250 jobs to its North Carolina campus; and most notably, the National Basketball Association, which relocated its 2017 All-Star Game from Charlotte, costing the state an estimated $100 million in economic losses. The bill was partially repealed in 2017 thanks to lawsuits and the blowback.
Texas’ 2017 attempt to pass a similar bill (Senate Bill 6 or “SB6”) collapsed under the same kind of pressure from tech giants like IBM, Amazon, Apple, Dell, and Microsoft, who feared Texas would face the same economic sanctions as North Carolina, but painted their opposition as concerns the bill was too “discriminatory.”
The Texas house speaker at the time, Joe Straus (R-San Antonio), sided with big business and refused to let the bill move forward. IBM led the lobbying effort and took out full-page ads in Sunday editions of The Dallas Morning News, San Antonio Express-News, and the Austin American-Statesman. Protestors flooded the Capitol building in Austin.
Fast forward to 2025. These same companies have made zero statements. No ads. Not even a tweet. I asked IBM if they still opposed women’s privacy in public spaces and if not, what has changed since 2017? They did not respond.
The Texas Senate has passed six different bathroom bills since 2017, only to move on and die in the House every legislative session.
But really, what has changed since 2017? Well, everything. For starters, public opinion on transgender issues. In 2017, a Pew Research Center poll found that 54 percent of Americans say a person’s gender is determined by their sex assigned at birth. In 2022, that number flew up to 60 percent. From 2016 to 2021, Americans’ support for bathroom and locker room bills increased by 12 percent, up to 47 percent in favor of the restrictions, according to a Public Religion Research Institute survey.
Why has public opinion changed so rapidly? Partially because the issues themselves expanded rapidly. The demands for “trans rights” didn’t stop at letting them use a public restroom at city hall. It spread into every sex-protected space — prisons, women’s shelters, middle school locker rooms — and then into not just private spaces but the more public, coveted spaces too. Men started beating (and physically hurting) girls and women in sports, at every level, then they started letting men win beauty pageants and “Woman of the Year” awards.
And after it spread, and the activists browbeat everyone into submission with their fearmongering tactics, Americans realized the threats they made weren’t actually true. Kids don’t kill themselves if you don’t affirm their gender dysphoria. Instead, we are seeing more studies with increased detransition rates. And trans people aren’t “harassed, beaten, and killed” for using the wrong restroom. The real victims are the women assaulted and raped by the men in their once-protected spaces, just like conservatives warned.
It’s now laughable to claim a bathroom bill is “discrimination” when everyone knows it’s common sense. Any corporation claiming otherwise would quickly become the next Bud Light or Target, and they know it. That’s the real reason you don’t see any Big Tech companies sticking their neck out for the sake of “discrimination” this time around. Instead, we are seeing more gatekeepers like Malcolm Gladwell admit they were “cowed” into pretending boys can be girls. Now that there’s no cost to them personally — only after someone else’s daughter has lost a medal or been raped on campus — do the elites, lobbyists, and tech CEOs feel free to let common sense legislation pass without a whisper.
Madeline Osburn is managing editor at The Federalist. Contact her at [email protected] or follow her on Twitter.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
