Team Sanity Wins A Major Victory Over The Gender Ideology Cult
Last night’s ruling: A major blow to trans activists and a victory for children
In a stunning defeat for trans activists, corrupt “civil liberties” organizations, big law firms, and Big Pharma, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals delivered a crushing blow to their arguments in support of transgenderism. This was not just a ruling on technicalities; it was a comprehensive dismantling of their claims in every aspect: medical, legal, and logical. With the composition of the Supreme Court, it is highly likely that this ruling will have far-reaching consequences for trans activists in the future. The bans on child gender transitions in Tennessee and Kentucky will now stand, despite the activists’ confident predictions of overturning them in court. We have emerged victorious.
Hold on to your convictions and stand up for the truth
This ruling serves as a powerful reminder that no matter how often you are labeled a bigot or pressured to believe falsehoods, it is crucial to hold on to your convictions. By staying true to what you know is right, you can ultimately achieve victory. And in this case, the lives of countless children will be better off because of it.
Just over a year ago, we exposed the disturbing practices at Vanderbilt Medical Center, where medical professionals were promoting experimental operations on young people, including children, who identified as transgender. These operations were not only ethically questionable but also highly profitable for the hospital. This revelation prompted lawmakers in Tennessee to take action, resulting in the passage of a law prohibiting medical procedures related to sexual identity in minors. Kentucky followed suit with a similar law.
WATCH: The Matt Walsh Show
However, a judge appointed by Donald Trump blocked the Tennessee law, claiming that voters did not have the right to overrule “medical experts” who advocated for cross-sex hormones and puberty blockers for minors. This decision was flawed and failed to consider the numerous inconsistencies and uncertainties surrounding these treatments. Fortunately, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals swiftly overturned the injunction, allowing the Tennessee law to take effect. And now, with their recent ruling, the court has gone even further in dismantling the arguments put forth by trans activists.
The court unequivocally rejected the notion that “experts,” medical associations, and Big Pharma should have the power to override the will of the people. It emphasized that in a democracy, the judgment of the majority of voters should prevail, as long as it is reasonable and not endangering children’s lives. Furthermore, the court highlighted the lack of substantial evidence supporting the effectiveness and safety of so-called “gender-affirming” treatments. It called into question the credibility of medical and regulatory authorities that have approved these treatments, noting their conflicting views and the off-label use of FDA-approved drugs. The court also criticized the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) for its inconsistent guidance on these treatments over the years.
Moreover, recent revelations have exposed the misleading nature of key data used by trans activists and doctors to support the use of puberty blockers. A retired scientist discovered that the original research from the UK, which claimed no adverse psychological effects, was highly flawed and failed to disclose the deteriorating mental health of many children on these blockers. This revelation further undermines the justification for administering these treatments to children.
The court’s ruling also debunked the claim that trans activists are a marginalized group deserving special legal protections. It pointed out that when every major institution and organization supports their cause, they cannot be considered marginalized. This is a significant blow to their victimhood narrative.
While there will likely be more legal battles ahead, this ruling sets a powerful precedent. It demonstrates that the claims and arguments put forth by trans activists and their allies hold no legal weight. The principles of self-governance and the protection of children take precedence over the agendas of Big Pharma and activist groups. We have achieved a major victory, and there are more victories to come.
With 19 states having passed similar laws, it is crucial for appellate courts to uphold these laws and, if necessary, take the fight to the Supreme Court. The Sixth Circuit’s ruling is a clear indication that our efforts are making a difference. Let us continue our work until we can ban this barbaric practice nationwide.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP
How does the victory in the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals case reiterate the importance of prioritizing evidence-based approaches, responsible medical practices, and the rights of parents in making decisions for the well-being of their children
(WPATH) for its biased and flawed standards of care, which prioritize ideology over the well-being of patients.
Celebrating the protection of children
The ruling by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals is a monumental victory for children. It recognizes the fundamental importance of protecting minors from irreversible decisions that could negatively impact their physical and mental health. The court’s decision acknowledges that the long-term effects and risks of gender-transitioning procedures and hormone therapies are still largely unknown, especially when it comes to young individuals whose bodies are still developing.
The court’s ruling also validates the concerns raised by parents, medical professionals, and organizations who have fought against the normalization of child gender transitions. It affirms that parents have the right to make decisions on behalf of their children, especially in matters of medical treatment that have potentially significant consequences. This ruling is a major step in restoring the authority of parents and protecting the best interests of children in our society.
From activism to evidence-based approaches
Trans activism has gained significant traction in recent years, with a focus on promoting the affirmation of gender identity above all else. However, this ruling exposes the flaws in the trans activist agenda and the lack of solid evidence supporting their claims. It highlights the need for a more moderate and evidence-based approach when it comes to children impacted by gender dysphoria.
We must prioritize thorough scientific research, clinical expertise, and the well-being of children over political ideologies and profit-driven motives. It is not “transphobic” to question the effects and possible harms of medical interventions on children. On the contrary, it is a responsible and compassionate approach that ensures we are acting in the best interests of those who are most vulnerable.
A victory for truth, reason, and child welfare
Last night’s ruling by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals is an important milestone in the fight to protect children from the harmful consequences of gender-transitioning procedures. It sends a powerful message to trans activists, civil liberties organizations, and medical professionals who prioritize ideology over the well-being of children.
We should celebrate this ruling as a victory for truth, reason, and the welfare of children. It reaffirms the importance of evidence-based approaches, responsible medical practices, and the rights of parents to make decisions in the best interests of their children.
Moving forward, we must continue to advocate for the protection of children, ensuring that their voices are heard and their well-being remains the top priority. It is through this commitment to truth and compassion that we can create a society that truly safeguards the rights and welfare of all individuals, including those who are most vulnerable.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
