Taylor Swift’s team is reportedly angry about a NYT op-ed that speculates on her sexuality, calling it invasive, untrue, and inappropriate
Taylor Swift’s Team Upset Over New York Times Op-Ed About Her Sexuality
Taylor Swift’s team is reportedly not happy about a recent New York Times op-ed that insinuated that she may be “queer.”
“There seems to be no boundary some journalists won’t cross when writing about Taylor, regardless of how invasive, untrue, and inappropriate it is – all under the protective veil of an ‘opinion piece,’” a source told CNN Business, per Page Six.
“Because of her massive success, in this moment there is a Taylor-shaped hole in people’s ethics,” the anonymous insider added.
The op-ed was published Thursday and strongly suggests that the Grammy Award-winning pop star has been dropping hints for her fans all along which indicate her sexuality. This theory plays on the well-known tendency for Swift to leave Easter eggs for her fans in lyrics, music videos, and social media posts.
The opinion piece was written by Anna Marks. In it, Marks presents the reader with “evidence” that Swift alluded to being part of the LGBTQ community on multiple occasions. The author refers to these bits of evidence as “dropped hairpins,” which is slang for giving clues about being LGBTQ.
“In isolation, a single dropped hairpin is perhaps meaningless or accidental, but considered together, they’re the unfurling of a ballerina bun after a long performance,” the author wrote in part.
“Those dropped hairpins began to appear in Ms. Swift’s artistry long before queer identity was undeniably marketable to mainstream America. They suggest to queer people that she is one of us.”
The writer goes on to speculate that Swift has been potentially communicating queerness in multiple ways, including through her clothing.
“Sometimes, Ms. Swift communicates through explicit sartorial choices — hair the colors of the bisexual pride flag or a recurring motif of rainbow dresses. She frequently depicts herself as trapped in glass closets or, well, in regular closets,” Marks wrote.
“The aesthetic of what would be known as the ‘Lover Era’ emerged as rainbows, butterflies and pastel shades of blue, purple and pink, colors that subtly evoke the bisexual pride flag,” the author says, also mentioning how the song “You Need to Calm Down” features queer celebrities and includes the line “why are you mad, when you could be GLAAD?”
Though Swift is a vocal supporter of the LGBTQ community, she denied rumors that she was secretly gay when they resurfaced with the re-release of her album “1989.”
Swift is currently in a high-profile relationship with Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce.
How does Marks argue that Taylor Swift’s lyrics and actions demonstrate her exploration of themes of same-sex love and relationships?
Des to her queerness through her lyrics and actions. Marks argues that Swift’s songs often delve into themes of same-sex love and relationships, and cites instances where the singer has expressed support for the LGBTQ+ community.
However, Swift’s team strongly denies these claims and asserts that the op-ed is baseless and unfounded. They argue that while Swift has always been an advocate for inclusivity and acceptance, her support for the LGBTQ+ community does not automatically imply her own sexual orientation. They emphasize that the singer has the right to keep her personal life private and that speculating on her sexuality without any concrete evidence is invasive and disrespectful.
This is not the first time Swift has faced speculation about her sexuality. In the past, she has been subjected to rumors and scrutiny regarding her relationships and personal life. Swift has always been vocal about her disdain for the invasion of her privacy, and this op-ed only adds fuel to the fire.
The controversy surrounding the op-ed highlights the double standards that often persist when it comes to discussing celebrities’ personal lives. While It is common for tabloids to speculate and make assumptions about the romantic lives of female celebrities, it is important to remember that a person’s sexuality is deeply personal and should not be subjected to public scrutiny without their consent. This applies to Swift as well as any other public figure.
In a time when representation and acceptance are crucial, it is essential to respect an individual’s right to privacy and self-identification. Swift, along with many other artists and public figures, has used her platform to raise awareness and support for inclusivity. However, it is crucial to remember that it is not our place to impose labels or assumptions onto others.
Swift’s team is not alone in condemning the op-ed. Many fans have expressed their disappointment and frustration with the New York Times for publishing the piece. They argue that it perpetuates harmful stereotypes and fosters a culture of invasive speculation.
In conclusion, the recent op-ed in the New York Times insinuating Taylor Swift’s queerness has sparked controversy and upset among the singer’s team and fans. While Swift has been a strong advocate for the LGBTQ+ community, her team emphasizes that her support does not automatically reveal her own sexual orientation. In a time where respect for privacy and self-identification is crucial, it is imperative to refrain from making assumptions or imposing labels onto others. This incident serves as a reminder that the personal lives of celebrities should be treated with respect and understanding, and speculating on their sexuality without their consent is both inappropriate and intrusive.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
