Swing State’s High Court Denies Trump’s Removal from Primary Ballot
The Michigan Supreme Court Rejects Effort to Remove Donald Trump from 2024 Presidential Primary Ballot
The Michigan Supreme Court has denied a liberal group’s attempt to disqualify Donald Trump from the 2024 presidential primary ballot. This decision comes shortly after Colorado’s high court ruled against Trump in a similar case.
A brief order stated that the Michigan justices “are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court,” dismissing the challenge from Free Speech For The People. The group argues that Trump’s involvement in the January 6, 2021 insurrection should disqualify him.
The challenge aimed to contest the Michigan Court of Appeals’ decision, which left the issue of primary ballot access to the Republican Party. However, the court did not rule on Trump’s eligibility for the general election ballot since he has not secured the GOP nomination.
Justice Elizabeth Welch of the Michigan Supreme Court expressed in an opinion that the lower court’s ruling still allows the appellants to pursue their legal efforts regarding the Michigan general election in 2024 if Trump becomes the Republican nominee or runs as an independent candidate.
Free Speech For The People, a left-wing organization that filed the lawsuit with election lawyer Mark Brewer, plans to continue their legal endeavors to remove Trump from the ballot in Michigan and other states. Their efforts are based on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which aims to prevent former officials who supported the Confederacy from holding public office after the Civil War.
“The decision isn’t binding outside of Michigan, and we will continue our legal actions in other states to enforce Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment against Donald Trump,” stated Ron Fein, legal director of Free Speech For The People.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP
“The Court’s decision is disappointing, but we will continue to seek to uphold this critical constitutional provision designed to protect our republic,” added Brewer in a statement. “Trump led a rebellion and insurrection against the Constitution when he tried to overturn the 2020 presidential election, and he is disqualified from ever seeking or holding public office again.”
Similar Section 3 challenges against Trump have been filed in other states, with some dismissed and others ongoing, according to a Lawfare tracker. Only the Colorado case has resulted in Trump’s removal from the primary ballot. Trump’s campaign plans to appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court, and the Colorado high court’s ruling is on hold until at least January 4.
“The Michigan Supreme Court has rightfully denied the desperate Democrat attempt to remove me, the leading candidate in the 2024 Presidential Election, from the ballot in the Great State of Michigan,” Trump stated in a post on Truth Social. “This pathetic gambit to rig the election has failed across the country, including in historically Democratic-leaning states. Colorado is the only state that has fallen prey to this scheme.”
What role do the courts play in the political process, particularly in matters of candidate eligibility and ballot access, as highlighted by the Michigan Supreme Court’s decision
Higan. The group argues that Trump’s involvement in the January 6, 2021 insurrection should disqualify him from holding any public office, including running for president in the 2024 election.
The Michigan Supreme Court’s decision to reject the effort to remove Trump from the 2024 presidential primary ballot is a significant development in the ongoing political battle. The court’s order dismissing the challenge from Free Speech For The People indicates that the justices do not believe the issue warrants their review.
The challenge aimed to challenge the Michigan Court of Appeals’ decision, which had left the question of primary ballot access to the Republican Party. However, the court did not rule on Trump’s eligibility for the general election ballot since he has not yet secured the GOP nomination.
In her opinion, Justice Elizabeth Welch of the Michigan Supreme Court acknowledged that the lower court’s ruling still allows the appellants to pursue their legal efforts regarding the Michigan general election in 2024. If Trump becomes the Republican nominee or runs as an independent candidate, they can continue to push for his disqualification.
The decision by the Michigan Supreme Court is in line with a recent ruling by Colorado’s high court, which also rejected a similar effort to remove Trump from the 2024 primary ballot. In both cases, the courts have upheld the principle that it is up to the respective political parties to decide who can appear on their primary ballots.
Free Speech For The People, accompanied by election lawyer Mark Brewer, has vowed to persist in their legal endeavors in Michigan. They remain committed to their belief that Trump’s involvement in the January 6 insurrection disqualifies him from holding any public office, including running for president.
The legal battle to disqualify Trump from the 2024 presidential primary ballot is likely to continue, with more challenges expected in other states. It remains to be seen how these efforts will impact Trump’s political aspirations and the upcoming election.
The rejection by the Michigan Supreme Court is a setback for the liberal group, but it does not completely shut down their efforts. They can still pursue legal action regarding Trump’s eligibility for the general election ballot if he secures the Republican nomination or runs as an independent candidate.
The decision also highlights the intricate relationship between the courts and the political process. While the courts play an essential role in interpreting the law, they often defer to the political parties in matters of candidate eligibility and ballot access.
As the 2024 presidential election draws closer, the legal battles surrounding Trump’s eligibility are likely to intensify. Whether he will ultimately be disqualified from the ballot or not remains uncertain.
In the meantime, both supporters and opponents of Trump will continue to pursue their legal and political strategies to shape the future of American politics. The Michigan Supreme Court’s rejection of the effort to remove Trump from the 2024 primary ballot is just one chapter in an ongoing saga that will undoubtedly captivate the nation’s attention.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
