Washington Examiner

Supreme Court dismisses hotel disability ‘tester’ case in first opinion of term

The Supreme Court Tosses Out Disability Rights ⁢Lawsuit in Landmark Decision

The Supreme Court‍ made a groundbreaking ruling on ‌Tuesday, settling a lawsuit between a ⁣hotel⁣ and a disability ⁢rights “tester” in a case that has captured⁤ national⁢ attention. In a unanimous 9-0⁢ decision, the ⁤court declared the Acheson‍ Hotels v. Laufer case moot, a conclusion that had been hinted at during the​ oral arguments​ held⁤ in⁢ October.

The ⁤Activist and the ‌Hotel

The lawsuit was initiated‍ by activist Deborah Laufer, known for filing hundreds of similar actions across the country.⁣ However, this ‍particular case centered around a ‍complaint filed in 2020 against an Acheson Hotels⁤ property in Maine. Laufer alleged that the hotel had‌ failed to provide online information regarding the accessibility of its rooms for individuals with disabilities.

The Biden administration’s ​Justice Department took the⁢ side of the hotel, contending that merely viewing hotel information online does not constitute a‍ sufficient injury for a plaintiff.

A Question Left Unanswered

Justice‍ Clarence Thomas, in a separate⁢ opinion, expressed his desire for the court to address the issue of whether ‌plaintiffs like Laufer have⁤ standing to‌ bring such claims. However, since ⁢Laufer voluntarily dismissed her⁣ claim in the District Court, ⁢the court did‌ not provide a definitive answer.

The court acknowledged‌ the hotel’s concerns‍ about ⁤litigants manipulating the⁤ court’s jurisdiction through a ⁤series ​of⁢ lawsuits, but ultimately concluded ⁤that Laufer had ⁢not ​abandoned her case to evade ⁤review.

Overall, this landmark decision sets a precedent for future cases involving disability rights⁤ and ​raises important ​questions ⁤about standing and the role of online information in legal disputes.

Is ‍it possible for someone who doesn’t have time to date to⁤ still find a fulfilling romantic relationship,⁤ and if so, what steps can they take to make it happen

A person who ‌doesn’t have‍ time to ‌date is someone ⁢who⁤ is constantly busy with their work or other‌ commitments and doesn’t have the capacity to allocate time for⁤ romantic relationships. They may prioritize their career or have other important obligations in ⁤their life⁢ that take up​ most of their time and‍ energy. As a result, ⁢they‌ may not ‌be‍ able to invest the‌ necessary time and effort into dating and building ⁣a relationship.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker