Supreme Court rules internet providers are not liable for illegal piracy by users
Deprecated: str_getcsv(): the $escape parameter must be provided as its default value will change in /var/www/html/breaking-news/wp-content/plugins/wp-auto-affiliate-links/aal_engine.php on line 361
The Supreme Court ruled that internet service providers are not liable for copyright infringement committed by their users. In Cox Communications v. Sony Music Entertainment, the Court unanimously held that Cox could not be held responsible for what subscribers did online, overturning a Fourth Circuit decision.
Key points:
– Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the majority opinion,joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Alito,Kagan,Gorsuch,Kavanaugh,and Barrett.
– The ruling rejects the idea that simply providing an internet service with knowledge that some users may infringe copyrights constitutes liability for the provider.
– The Court found that Cox did not induce infringement, nor did it tailor its service to facilitate piracy; Cox had warnings, suspended services, and terminated accounts to curb infringement.
– Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote a seperate concurring opinion agreeing with the result but offering different reasoning and criticizing the breadth of the majority’s language.
– The decision marks a notable setback for Sony and the record labels, who had won in lower courts, including an initial $1 billion judgment that was reduced on appeal.
– The Department of Justice supported Cox’s position,arguing that finding ISP liability could expand copyright liability and risk noninfringing users losing access to the internet.
– The ruling may influence how future cases assess secondary copyright liability for providers of internet services.
Supreme Court rules internet providers are not liable for illegal piracy by users
The Supreme Court unanimously found that internet service providers are not liable for online piracy committed by its users, rejecting a lawsuit brought by multiple record labels, including Sony, against Cox Communications, a major internet service provider.
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the majority opinion in Cox Communications v. Sony Music Entertainment, which was joined by six other justices, overturning a ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit that found Cox liable for copyright infringement committed by its users.
“Under our precedents, a company is not liable as a copyright infringer for merely providing a service to the general public with knowledge that it will be used by some to infringe copyrights,” Thomas wrote. “Accordingly, we reverse.”
Thomas rejected the assertion by Sony that ISPs should be held liable for users’ actions simply because they had knowledge some of its users were committing copyright infringement, noting the complexity of tracking down infringing users and Cox’s established programs to curb piracy among its customers.
“Cox provided Internet service to its subscribers, but it did not intend for that service to be used to commit copyright infringement,” Thomas wrote. “Holding Cox liable merely for failing to terminate Internet service to infringing accounts would expand secondary copyright liability beyond our precedents.
“Cox neither induced its users’ infringement nor provided a service tailored to infringement,” Thomas said. “As for inducement, Cox did not ‘induce’ or ‘encourage’ its subscribers to infringe in any manner. Sony provided no ‘evidence of express promotion, marketing, and intent to promote’ infringement. And, Cox repeatedly discouraged copyright infringement by sending warnings, suspending services, and terminating accounts.”
Thomas’s majority opinion was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts, along with justices Samuel Alito, Elena Kagan, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett. Justice Sonia Sotomayor filed her own opinion, joined by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, that also sided with Cox over Sony in the case, but for reasons different than the majority. Sotomayor’s concurring opinion agreed that the facts of this case did not justify holding Cox liable, but took issue with the broad scope of the majority’s opinion.
The ruling marks a significant loss for the record labels, which had been successful in two previous lower courts. A district court had handed them a $1 billion judgment and while a higher appeals court tossed the judgment, it still found Cox liable for copyright infringement of its users.
The Justice Department backed Cox up in its appeal to the Supreme Court, warning that finding the ISP liable in this case would radically expand the scope of legal liability and could cause “numerous non-infringing users to lose their internet access.”
The ruling came less than four months after the Supreme Court heard arguments in the case. The Supreme Court is expected to release rulings in the remaining cases this term by the end of June.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
