Supreme Court mulls Jan. 6 cases impacting Trump’s prosecution
The Supreme Court Considers Petitions from Defendants Charged in Relation to the Jan. 6 Riot
The Supreme Court is currently deliberating whether to grant petitions from defendants charged in connection with the Jan. 6 riot, a decision that could have significant implications for the criminal prosecution of former President Donald Trump.
The defendants are seeking to dismiss a charge in their indictments that accuses them of obstructing an official proceeding at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. This charge stems from the temporary halt in Congress’s certification of President Joe Biden’s victory after rioters stormed the building. On Friday, the justices will convene for a private conference to discuss whether to allow an oral argument review involving defendants Edward Lang, Joseph Fischer, and Garrett Miller.
Implications for the Criminal Prosecution of Trump
The Supreme Court is being asked to consider whether Section 1512 (c)(2) of the United States Code is the appropriate statute under which to prosecute the defendants. Defense counsel for Lang argues that the outcome of this dispute could impact ”hundreds of cases as the Department of Justice continues to charge folks who participated in a protest turned violent on January 6, 2021.” This petition was filed on July 11.
It is worth noting that Trump himself has been charged with the same offense, among others, in his federal election interference case brought by special counsel Jack Smith.
Potential Outcomes
If the Supreme Court rejects the case, the lower court ruling that allowed the government to pursue charges against the defendants will remain in place. On the other hand, if the Court decides to take up the case, it could lead to a delay in the defendants’ legal proceedings until oral arguments can be heard, likely in the spring. The justices would then take until the end of June to render a decision. A minimum of four votes is required for the Court to grant a case for review.
Furthermore, if the petition is granted, it could present an opportunity for Trump’s counsel to request a delay in his election interference trial, which is scheduled to begin on March 4, the day before several states vote for the Republican nominee for the general election in November.
The Case of Edward Lang
Edward Lang, one of the defendants, was allegedly captured on video during the riot using a police riot shield and slamming it into the ground near law enforcement. He is also accused of swinging a baseball bat at police officers multiple times. Lang’s counsel sought to dismiss the obstruction charge, which carries a 20-year sentence, ahead of his trial. The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia initially granted the motion, but an appeals court later reversed the decision.
This particular charge is the most severe penalty that prosecutors have pursued in the Jan. 6 cases thus far. Notable figures involved in the riot, such as Enrique Tarrio and Stewart Rhodes, leaders of the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers groups, respectively, have also faced this charge. Tarrio was sentenced to 22 years in prison in September, while Rhodes received an 18-year sentence in May.
Possible Impact on Trump’s Future
Trump is currently the leading contender for the GOP nomination, and any delay in his trial would likely work in his favor. If he wins the 2024 election, it could potentially dismiss the charges he faces in two federal cases, including the election interference case. However, if the D.C. case proceeds as scheduled in March, there is a chance he could be convicted before the election.
Attorneys for Trump argue that the indictment inappropriately applies the statute in question to their client. They claim that the statute, which is typically used in cases of accounting fraud, is being stretched beyond its intended purpose. Lang’s attorney also believes that applying this charge too broadly could have a chilling effect on public participation in events, as people may fear being imprisoned for the actions of others.
The Supreme Court’s Decision
The Supreme Court receives thousands of petitions each term but only grants a small fraction of them. However, in recent years, the justices have shown a willingness to examine criminal statutes when challengers present a plausible argument that the statute’s application against a defendant is overly broad.
The Court typically decides on cases for the current term in December, which means that if the application is granted, this case would be argued and decided by the end of June. The justices were supposed to consider these cases last week but were delayed due to the passing of former Justice Sandra Day O’Connor.
Even if the Supreme Court grants the case and Trump succeeds in temporarily delaying his trial, the election subversion case against him could proceed after the Court’s ruling in the summer. The decision on whether to take up the case could be imminent after Friday’s conference, as the Court usually releases an orders list on Mondays to announce any new case grants or denials.
If the Court dismisses the obstruction charge for the defendants in the Jan. 6 cases, how might this impact the criminal prosecution of former President Donald Trump and the strength of the arguments against him
Otential Impact on Future Cases
The outcome of the Supreme Court’s decision could have far-reaching consequences for future cases related to the Jan. 6 riot. If the Court rules in favor of the defendants and dismisses the obstruction charge, it could set a precedent that makes it more difficult for prosecutors to secure convictions in similar cases. On the other hand, if the Court upholds the charge, it could strengthen the government’s position and create a stronger legal framework for prosecuting individuals involved in the riot. Additionally, the Court’s decision could impact the criminal prosecution of former President Donald Trump. As previously mentioned, Trump has also been charged with the same offense in a separate case. If the Court dismisses the obstruction charge for the defendants in the Jan. 6 cases, it could potentially weaken the prosecution’s argument in Trump’s case and make it more challenging to secure a conviction. The Supreme Court’s consideration of petitions from defendants charged in relation to the Jan. 6 riot carries significant implications for both the defendants themselves and the wider criminal prosecution of individuals involved in the events of that day. The Court’s decision could impact the legal framework for future cases, as well as the ongoing prosecution of former President Donald Trump. It remains to be seen how the Court will rule, but its decision will undoubtedly shape the course of justice in the months and years to come.Conclusion
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
