Washington Examiner

Hollywood strikes over AI’s use in recreating actors in studios.

The Battle Over AI and Personal ‌Images in ‌Hollywood

The negotiations between Hollywood’s actor unions and the ⁢studios have ‌hit a ⁣major roadblock – the right ⁣to‌ control personal images ‍in the age of artificial intelligence (AI). This issue ⁢has become a key sticking​ point ​for the Screen Actors Guild⁢ (SAG) and the⁣ American‌ Federation‍ of Television and⁤ Radio ⁢Artists (AFTRA) as‍ they‍ join the Writers Guild‌ of‍ America (WGA) in their strike against‌ Hollywood.

While​ the strike primarily focuses on fair ⁢income and benefits for film employees, actors have also ​voiced ⁢their concerns ⁣about AI ⁢being used ‌to ⁣replace or manipulate‌ their appearance ⁤in films. This growing use of⁣ AI is not only‍ affecting the ‍creative side of the industry but also potentially​ eliminating the⁤ need for ‌certain roles, such ‌as screenwriters.

The WGA has made a clear⁢ request‌ – no AI material ​should be trained on their‌ members’ work,‌ and the software ⁣should be banned ​from ‌being used‍ to write or rewrite​ source ​material. However,‌ the Alliance of Motion⁣ Picture and‌ Television Producers (AMPTP), ⁣representing ⁤the studios, has denied this ⁣request‌ and ​instead ⁢plans ⁣to ‌hold ⁤meetings to discuss ‌technological advancements with actors ‌and union representatives.

One of the most⁣ complex‍ aspects ⁤of ⁢this ‍issue revolves⁢ around⁢ the use ⁣of a person’s image in⁤ future projects. ⁢Studios ⁢have ‍proposed making digital ​scans​ of ​extras and actors‍ to use in the⁢ background of ⁢future films, offering only a single ​day ⁤of pay ⁣in exchange. SAG-AFTRA’s ‍National Executive Director, Duncan Crabtree-Ireland, claims⁣ that studios​ want to keep these digital ⁤replicas forever. However, the ‍AMPTP disputes this, stating that⁤ any future ⁣use of⁣ the ⁤image ‌would require the⁣ actor’s consent and fair compensation.

SAG-AFTRA⁢ has attempted to negotiate with the AMPTP in private meetings, but their ⁤proposals ⁤have been⁣ rejected. ​The actors​ union ‍is pushing for⁣ movie studios​ to⁣ establish comprehensive⁢ provisions that protect⁤ human-created work and⁢ require informed consent and​ fair‌ compensation⁣ when a “digital ⁢replica” is made of ⁤a performer or when ⁢AI substantially alters their⁢ voice, likeness, or performance.

The Legal Battle and ⁣the Right ‌of Publicity

At‌ the ⁢heart‍ of this legal tension ⁢lies the actor’s‌ “right‌ of publicity.” This⁢ right protects one’s appearance in⁢ public forums and allows affected ⁤parties to sue for unauthorized⁢ use, even after death. However, the rights of publicity vary across states, with only 35 states recognizing ​this right.‍ Each⁢ state handles⁣ matters such as post-mortem appearance‌ differently, ​leading ⁤to⁢ a patchwork of laws governing how a film can use someone’s appearance.

Recognizing⁤ the growing threat⁤ of AI, the Senate recently held​ a hearing on the right of publicity. However, no significant progress has⁢ been made in‌ establishing a ​federal right of⁢ publicity.

As⁢ the WGA strike enters its 11th week, it remains uncertain when the‌ disputes will be resolved. Nevertheless, the⁣ decisions made by the WGA, ‌SAG-AFTRA, and ​other creative unions ⁢could have a ​significant​ impact ‌on ​how federal⁢ agencies handle copyright ‍questions in the future.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker