Jonathan Turley criticizes Colorado for its anti-democratic actions in removing Trump from the ballot
Colorado State Supreme Court Removes Trump from Presidential Ballot
George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley strongly criticized the Colorado State Supreme Court’s decision to remove former President Donald Trump from the state’s presidential ballot. Turley expressed his disagreement with the ruling, which claimed that Trump’s involvement in the January 6, 2021 insurrection made him ineligible to run for office, despite not being charged or convicted.
…This ends a string of losses for advocates of this dangerous novel theory. They finally found a court that would embrace what the court admits is a case of “first impression.” My first impression remains the same. The court is dead wrong in my view…https://t.co/lGhv9je2a7
— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) December 19, 2023
Turley criticized the court’s decision, stating that it sets a dangerous precedent that could lead to the removal of future candidates for almost any reason. He pointed out that the court’s reliance on Schenck v. U.S., a case involving the denial of free speech rights, was concerning. Turley argued that the Colorado Supreme Court’s opinion allows for the removal of candidates from ballots based on arbitrary reasons.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP
…The opinion is remarkable in how the four justices adopted the most sweeping interpretations to get over each barrier. The result is lack of a limiting principle. I view the opinion as strikingly anti-democratic in what it now allows states to do in blue and red states alike.
— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) December 20, 2023
Turley further criticized the Colorado Supreme Court’s opinion, highlighting how the justices used broad interpretations to overcome obstacles, resulting in a lack of a limiting principle. He argued that the opinion is undemocratic and grants states the power to take similar actions in both blue and red states.
The Colorado Republican Party has threatened to cancel the state’s primary if Trump is not included on the ballot. Trump himself has released a statement expressing his frustration with the court’s ruling, accusing it of political interference and calling it a “banana republic.”
How does the scholar argue that the court’s decision violates the presumption of innocence and the right to present one’s case to the voters?
189618528?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw”>March 5, 2024
Turley, a well-respected constitutional law scholar, argued that the Colorado State Supreme Court had overstepped its boundaries by disqualifying Trump from the presidential ballot based on his alleged involvement in the Capitol insurrection. According to Turley, the court’s decision sets a dangerous precedent, as it allows courts to deny individuals the right to run for office based on unproven accusations.
One of the fundamental principles of the American legal system is the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. Turley highlighted that Trump has not been charged or convicted in relation to the January 6th events, making the court’s decision premature and unfair. He emphasized that anyone running for office should be afforded the opportunity to present their case to the voters and allow the democratic process to determine their suitability for office.
Turley further criticized the Colorado State Supreme Court for embracing a “novel theory” that has not been tested in the courts before. He argued that the court’s decision was based on an untested legal framework, which opens the door for subjective interpretations and potential abuses of power in future cases.
Moreover, Turley emphasized the importance of upholding the Electoral College system and respecting the will of the people. By removing Trump from the ballot, the Colorado State Supreme Court effectively disregarded the votes and preferences of the citizens who support him, undermining the democratic principles that underpin the presidential election process.
The decision of the Colorado State Supreme Court also sparked concerns about the impartiality and politicization of the judiciary. Turley questioned whether the court’s ruling was influenced by partisan considerations rather than a neutral interpretation of the law. He warned that such actions erode public trust in the judicial system and further polarize the already divided political landscape.
Turley concluded by reaffirming his opposition to the Colorado State Supreme Court’s decision, asserting that it was “dead wrong” in his view. He called for a more careful and measured approach in future cases involving disqualification from the presidential ballot, one that adheres to established legal principles and protects the integrity of the democratic process.
In a time when political tensions are high, it is crucial to ensure that legal decisions are made impartially, based on facts, and in accordance with established legal principles. The controversy surrounding Trump’s disqualification from the Colorado presidential ballot serves as a reminder of the importance of upholding these fundamental principles and preserving the integrity of our democratic institutions.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
