Stephen A. Smith furious about Biden’s fried chicken dinner with black family
ESPN Commentator Stephen A. Smith Expresses Outrage Over President Biden’s Fried Chicken Dinner
In a recent episode of the Stephen A. Smith Show, ESPN commentator Stephen A. Smith unleashed his fury upon seeing a video clip of President Joe Biden enjoying a fried chicken dinner with a black family. The clip showed the president engaging in a mealtime conversation with two teenage boys and their father, with hamburgers on the president’s and father’s plates, and a plate of fried chicken in front of the boys.
Smith, visibly angered, questioned the president’s choice of food and its racial implications. “Why do I have a problem with this? First of all, we all know about racial tropes, do we not?” Smith exclaimed. He then turned his attention directly to President Biden, asking, “What the hell are you doing eating fried chicken? You’re 81. What 81-year-old do you know is munching on fried chicken? Considering your health, it’s not the greatest look.”
Conservative Outlets Criticized for Exploiting the Video
Smith also took aim at conservative outlets like Fox News for their coverage of the video. He accused them of using the clip, which was posted on the president’s Instagram account, as ammunition against him. “I recognize what he’s done for HBCUs, I recognize what he’s done for infrastructure, I recognize what he’s done for forgiveness of student loans — I recognize these things,” Smith acknowledged. “But this imagery… who the hell came up with that idea? Trump and the GOP are going to use it to their advantage, and they’ll be right to do so.”
Smith concluded his passionate rant by suggesting that he himself should have run for president, criticizing the other candidates for their “insensitivity” and “lack of understanding.” He even boldly claimed that he could have garnered “tens of millions of votes” for his own campaign.
While President Biden faces three Democratic challengers, including Rep. Dean Phillips, YouTube news anchor Cenk Uygur, and author Marianne Williamson, he recently secured a victory in Nevada with an impressive 89.4% of the vote.
Click here to read more from The Washington Examiner.
Why is the outrage expressed by Stephen A. Smith over President Biden’s choice of dinner inappropriate and unfounded?
Wed the President engaging in casual conversation and laughter with the family while they all enjoyed a meal together.
The outrage expressed by Stephen A. Smith regarding the President’s choice of dinner is quite astounding. As an experienced ESPN commentator, one would expect Smith to offer thoughtful analysis and commentary on sports events, rather than engaging in baseless and divisive criticism of the President’s personal preferences.
It is disappointing to witness such a prominent figure in the sports media industry, who is entrusted with informing and entertaining millions of viewers, deviate from his area of expertise and venture into the realm of politics and personal judgments.
Smith’s outrage stems from a long-standing stereotype associating fried chicken with African Americans. This stereotype has been perpetuated throughout history, leading to the marginalization and stereotyping of the Black community. It is essential to recognize the harm caused by such stereotypes and to challenge them instead, promoting unity and understanding.
The choice of meal for a public figure should not be scrutinized, but rather the focus should be on their policies, actions, and the impact they have on the nation as a whole. A President’s dinner preferences do not define their ability to lead or make critical decisions that affect the American people.
Ironically, Smith himself has been an advocate for combating racial stereotypes and promoting racial equality in sports. His outrage over President Biden’s fried chicken dinner seems inconsistent with his professed values of fairness and justice.
It is vital to remember that we live in a diverse and multicultural society, where individuals should be free to enjoy their personal choices without fear of being judged or criticized. As a nation, we must move beyond stereotypes and embrace our differences, recognizing that they enrich our society rather than divide us.
Instead of focusing on frivolous matters like a choice of dinner, let us encourage open dialogue and discussion on relevant political issues that truly affect society. Critiquing the President’s dinner choice not only detracts from meaningful conversations and debates but also undermines the role of media in promoting informed opinions and fostering constructive discussions.
Stephen A. Smith possesses a platform that could be used to elevate important discussions and contribute positively to society. It is disheartening to witness the misuse of such influence to perpetuate stereotypes and incite unnecessary outrage over a seemingly trivial matter.
In conclusion, the outrage expressed by ESPN commentator Stephen A. Smith regarding President Biden’s fried chicken dinner is unwarranted. As a society, we must focus on substantive issues that shape our nation rather than engaging in baseless criticism based on stereotypes. Let us work towards promoting unity, understanding, and constructive conversations that benefit us all.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
