Washington Examiner

Appeals court revives challenge to Cook County’s firearm and ammunition tax

Cook County’s Gun and Ammunition Tax Faces ⁣Second Amendment Challenge

A controversial tax on guns and ammunition in Cook County is once again under scrutiny ‌as a case alleging⁢ its violation of the Second⁢ Amendment is revived. The⁣ county approved the tax in 2012, imposing a $25 fee per gun and a variable fee per cartridge of ⁣ammunition. After initial challenges, the Illinois Supreme Court ruled against the county in 2021, prompting modifications to the ordinance.

Gun rights ‍advocate Todd Vandermyde, unsatisfied with the changes,​ filed a Second⁢ Amendment challenge. Although the district court initially dismissed the case, an appeals court recently ​reinstated it, stating that the tax cannot be considered a permissible fee associated with⁢ the exercise of⁣ the Second Amendment right.

“This is not a finding that the tax is‌ unconstitutional. It is a⁣ finding that the lower court​ erred in dismissing the ​case⁣ and that every argument of Cook County is such that the appellate court didn’t buy it,” Vandermyde said.

Vandermyde expressed confidence in​ their eventual⁢ victory, ​suggesting that if successful, Cook County may have to refund millions of dollars to affected individuals. ⁣The central issue revolves around whether the ​tax is a fee or a tax and whether taxing a constitutional right constitutes an infringement.

“To infringe was to hinder and the county, ⁢very suspect, left that part of the definition out of their pleadings and filings with the court and they were called on it,” Vandermyde​ explained.

The appeals court judges emphasized that the Second Amendment not only prohibits⁢ the destruction of the right but also lesser violations that​ impede an individual’s ability to exercise their right to bear arms.⁤ The case has been remanded to the district court for further proceedings.

What is the⁤ current status ‌of the Second Amendment challenge against Cook County’s⁤ gun and ⁤ammunition tax?

Cook County’s Gun and Ammunition Tax Faces Second ​Amendment Challenge

A polarizing tax on guns and ammunition in ​Cook County, Illinois,​ is once again making headlines as ⁤a case ​alleging its ⁣violation of the ‌Second Amendment is being‌ revived. Initially approved in 2012, ​this tax ⁢imposed a $25 fee per ​gun and ‍a variable⁣ fee per cartridge of ammunition. However, after facing legal challenges, ​the Illinois ⁢Supreme ⁤Court ⁣ruled against the county ⁣in 2021, prompting modifications to the ordinance.

Gun rights advocate Todd Vandermyde, who found the changes to be unsatisfactory, filed a Second Amendment challenge ‌against the tax. Although the district ⁤court initially dismissed the case, an appeals court recently reinstated it, stating ⁤that the tax ⁣cannot be considered‌ a permissible⁣ fee associated with the ⁤exercise of the Second Amendment right.

“This is not ⁢a finding ⁣that the tax‌ is unconstitutional. It is a finding that the lower court ⁣erred ​in dismissing the case, and that every argument ‍of Cook⁤ County is such that the appellate court didn’t⁢ buy ⁢it,” Vandermyde said.

Vandermyde ⁢expressed confidence in their eventual victory and suggested that‌ if successful,⁣ Cook County ‍may be‍ required to refund millions of dollars to affected individuals. The central​ issue ⁣at hand revolves⁣ around whether the ​tax is a fee or a tax, and ‌whether ‌imposing a ‌tax on a⁣ constitutional right‍ constitutes an infringement.

“To infringe was⁢ to‌ hinder, ⁣and the county, suspectly, left that part of the definition out of ‍their pleadings and filings with ⁤the court, and they were called on it,” ‌Vandermyde explained.

The appeals court judges emphasized that the Second Amendment not only prevents the destruction of the right itself but also ⁤prohibits lesser​ violations that impede​ an individual’s ability to exercise their right to bear arms. As a result, ‌the case ⁤has been remanded ‌to the district court for further proceedings.

This​ case raises ⁢important questions about the limits of⁢ taxation when it comes to constitutional rights. While the government has ⁢the ‌power to impose taxes ⁣to fund various ⁢programs and initiatives, it is ⁣crucial⁢ to scrutinize whether these taxes infringe upon fundamental rights guaranteed‍ by the Constitution. The ‌Second Amendment, in particular, has long been a topic of⁤ intense debate, and this ongoing challenge ⁤in Cook County further adds complexity to ⁢this discussion.

As ⁣the case moves forward, legal experts and advocates from ‍both⁢ sides will eagerly ‌await ⁤the‍ final decision. It will undoubtedly have ⁢implications beyond Cook ​County, possibly ⁤setting a precedent for similar challenges in other parts of the country. The outcome of this case could potentially shape the future of gun control ⁢measures and taxation in relation to Second‍ Amendment rights.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker