Special Counsel urges Supreme Court for swift ruling on Trump’s immunity
Special Counsel Jack Smith Urges Supreme Court to Determine Trump’s Immunity
In a bold move, Special Counsel Jack Smith has asked the Supreme Court to swiftly decide whether former President Donald Trump is immune from prosecution, even before an appeals court ruling on the matter.
“The United States recognizes that this is an extraordinary request. This is an extraordinary case. The Court should grant certiorari and set a briefing schedule that would permit this case to be argued and resolved as promptly as possible,” Smith’s team wrote.
Smith’s filing draws on precedent from the Nixon Watergate tapes case and indicates his determination to keep the schedule on track for the 2020 election case against Trump to go to trial in March in Washington, D.C.
The Key Question
The crucial question Smith wants the high court to answer is whether a former President is completely immune from federal prosecution for crimes committed while in office or if there is constitutional protection from federal prosecution when the President has been impeached but not convicted before the criminal proceedings begin.
Trump, who was impeached for allegedly encouraging the U.S. Capitol breach on January 6, 2021, before being acquitted by the Senate, has pleaded not guilty in the federal case where he is accused of unlawfully plotting to overturn the results of the 2020 election. His lawyers filed a motion to dismiss the case in October, arguing that Trump’s actions were within the scope of his official duties.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP
However, U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, rejected Trump’s claims of immunity, stating that the defendant’s service as Commander in Chief did not grant him the right to evade criminal accountability.
Trump has filed an appeal and requested a pause in the proceedings. Smith’s team, anticipating that the Supreme Court may not take up the case before a ruling at the appellate level, has also filed a separate motion for expedited proceedings in the federal appeals court in Washington, D.C.
“A HUGE gambit by Jack Smith. He goes DIRECTLY to the Supreme Court on the immunity issue, while moving for expedited briefing in the appeals court,” former federal prosecutor Harry Litman said. “He’s inviting trouble but obviously has calculated they’re going to decide whether to take it at some point, so might as well be sooner.”
The trial is scheduled to begin on March 4, 2024, just one day before Super Tuesday, which holds significance as Trump is running a campaign for another term in the White House. Throughout the case, Trump has been restrained in his public statements due to a gag order.
In addition to this case, Trump is facing three other criminal cases, including one led by Smith regarding the handling of classified documents, as well as civil litigation. Trump vehemently denies any wrongdoing and claims that politically motivated prosecutors are conducting a “witch hunt” against him.
What is the potential significance of the Supreme Court’s decision regarding immunity for a former president?
T THE DAILY WIRE APP FOR MORE NEWS LIKE THIS.
The Significance of the Case
The case against Trump holds significant implications for future presidents and the legal system in the United States. If the Supreme Court decides that a former president is immune from prosecution for crimes committed while in office, it could set a precedent that allows future presidents to act with impunity, knowing that they cannot be held accountable for their actions once their term ends. On the other hand, if the Court denies immunity, it would establish that no individual, not even the President, is above the law.
Furthermore, the case raises questions about the relationship between impeachment and criminal proceedings. Should a president who has been impeached but not convicted be shielded from federal prosecution? The Court’s decision could provide clarity on this issue and help navigate future scenarios where criminal charges are brought against a former president.
The Arguments Made
In their petition to the Supreme Court, Special Counsel Jack Smith’s team argues that the urgency of this case necessitates swift action from the Court. They emphasize the need for a definitive ruling before an appeals court reaches a decision, as this would expedite the trial proceedings and ensure that justice is served in a timely manner.
Smith’s team draws on precedent from the Nixon Watergate tapes case, which established that the President does not possess absolute immunity from criminal proceedings while in office. They contend that the same principle should apply to a former president, as to grant immunity would undermine the foundation of democracy and the principles of accountability and justice upon which the nation is built.
On the other hand, Trump’s legal team maintains that the former President should be immune from prosecution for his actions while in office. They argue that his alleged actions in relation to the Capitol breach were within the scope of his official duties and thus protected by executive privilege.
The Implications for the 2020 Election Case
The timing of the Supreme Court’s decision will have a direct impact on the 2020 election case against Trump, which is scheduled to go to trial in March in Washington, D.C. Setting a prompt briefing schedule and expediting the resolution of the immunity question would ensure that the trial proceeds as planned and allows the justice system to address the alleged wrongdoing in a timely manner.
The outcome of the immunity question will undoubtedly shape the course of the trial. If the Court grants immunity to Trump, it would likely lead to the dismissal of the case, as the former President would be shielded from federal prosecution. On the other hand, if immunity is denied, the trial would proceed, and Trump would have to defend himself against the charges brought against him.
Ultimately, the Supreme Court’s decision in this case will have far-reaching consequences for the legal system, the presidency, and the perception of accountability in American democracy. It remains to be seen how the Court will weigh the arguments presented and whether it will grant the extraordinary request to determine Trump’s immunity from prosecution.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
