oann

SpaceX Countersues Hiring Discrimination Lawsuit By DOJ


The ⁤SpaceX Falcon Heavy rocket sits on launch⁣ pad 39A at Kennedy Space Center as it is prepared ‌for ⁣tomorrow’s lift-off on February 5, ⁣2018 ‌in Cape Canaveral, Florida. (Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

OAN’s Elizabeth Volberding
4:40 PM – Thursday, ⁢November 8, 2023

Elon Musk-owned company‍ SpaceX ‌has successfully halted ‍the Department of Justice’s hiring discrimination ‌lawsuit through a court order.

Advertisement

SpaceX recently won a court ruling that effectively blocks the ⁣United States ‍Department of Justice’s (DOJ) ‍lawsuit. According ⁣to a report, the lawsuit alleged that the rocket company engaged in discriminatory‍ practices against “immigrants and asylum seekers” during its hiring process.

U.S. District Judge Rolando Olvera in Brownsville, Texas, rejected⁢ the DOJ’s case,⁤ stating that the administrative‌ judges ⁣responsible‌ for anti-immigration bias⁢ cases at the⁢ DOJ were not “properly appointed.”

In a post on X, formerly Twitter, Musk expressed his frustration,‍ claiming that​ SpaceX was repeatedly warned that hiring non-U.S. permanent residents would violate international arms trafficking laws, which is a criminal offense. Musk believes ​that ​the DOJ’s⁣ actions are politically motivated and an ‌abuse of power.

The ⁤SpaceX founder and CEO firmly believes that‍ the DOJ is using its authority for political gain.

The DOJ’s lawsuit, filed in August,⁣ accused SpaceX of consistently excluding‌ refugees and asylum ⁣seekers from job applications, neglecting to review their applications, and rejecting⁣ them based on their citizenship status.

SpaceX ‌cited control laws such​ as the International ⁤Traffic in Arms Regulations ​to justify its hiring practices, as rockets are considered “advanced weapons technology,” according to the ⁤lawsuit.

In response, Musk’s company filed a​ counter-lawsuit, denying the‍ allegations and asserting that they‌ are “unconstitutional.”

According to SpaceX, the administrative law judge⁢ overseeing the case has an “unconstitutional insulation from Presidential authority.”

Furthermore, SpaceX argues that the case should be heard in ​a federal court rather than an administrative proceeding, as it‍ is being denied its right to a jury trial.

The Texas judge agreed with SpaceX’s arguments and ruled in their‌ favor, stating that the Constitution requires judges to be appointed by the president and⁤ confirmed by the U.S. Senate.

This is​ not the first time SpaceX has faced accusations of discrimination. In October,⁢ a former employee filed a lawsuit alleging that the company paid females and minorities less ‍than their⁤ white male ‌counterparts. Tesla, another company founded by Musk, also faced a racial ⁤discrimination lawsuit‍ in 2022 when several Black employees‍ claimed mistreatment at Tesla’s California factory.

Stay informed! ‌Subscribe to receive breaking news ‌directly‌ to your inbox for ⁣free. https://www.oann.com/alerts

⁤ Share this post!

We’re six weeks into the first of Donald Trump’s trials. He and his adult ‌children ⁣have testified and ‌the prosecutions rests.

The owners of a funeral home in Colorado are arrested for mishandling hundreds of dead bodies.

Hialeah’s mayor shows his support for President Trump in his run for the ⁣White House saying Trump follows through on his promises.

The Department Of Homeland Security secretary testifies before the Senate to answer for the billions of ⁢dollars the Biden Administration requested.

An adviser to Europe’s ‍top court said⁢ an EU tribunal made legal ‌errors when it ruled in favor of Apple.

Zeekr will this week publicly release some details of its plans to list shares ‌in New York.

Top EU court ⁢backs Google, Meta, ⁤and TikTok against Austrian law mandating hate speech deletion.

Amazon to invest millions in Olympus LLM model to rival OpenAI and Alphabet.

rnrn

Behind the allegations. Does‌ SpaceX have a specific equal pay policy ​in place to address the allegations⁤ of discriminatory hiring practices?‌ How⁢ does SpaceX justify its hiring practices based ‍on ‍control laws like the International Traffic in Arms Regulations? How ‍does this court ruling impact the‌ future of fair and inclusive hiring practices in the⁢ space industry

Ale counterparts. In response, SpaceX denied the allegations and stated that they‌ have an equal pay policy in place.

The ⁢recent court ruling in favor of SpaceX is​ another ⁢win for ⁤the​ company, which has been at the forefront of‍ space exploration and innovation. Elon Musk, the founder and CEO of SpaceX, has been vocal about his frustration with ‌the DOJ’s actions, claiming that they are politically motivated and an abuse of ​power.

In a post on X ‍(formerly Twitter), Musk expressed his belief⁣ that SpaceX was repeatedly warned that hiring non-U.S. permanent​ residents would violate international arms trafficking laws, ⁤which is a criminal‌ offense. ‌He also ‍mentioned that⁢ the company​ couldn’t even hire Canadian⁢ citizens,​ despite Canada being part ​of NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command).

The​ DOJ’s lawsuit alleged⁣ that SpaceX engaged in discriminatory practices against immigrants and asylum⁤ seekers during its⁣ hiring ‍process. However,​ U.S. District Judge Rolando Olvera in Brownsville, Texas, rejected the case, stating⁤ that the administrative judges responsible⁣ for anti-immigration bias cases at the DOJ were not properly ​appointed.

SpaceX justified its hiring practices by citing control laws such as the International ⁤Traffic in ⁢Arms Regulations, as ⁢rockets are considered advanced weapons technology. The company ​argued that the​ case should be heard ​in a federal⁤ court rather than an administrative proceeding, as it is ⁤being denied its right ​to a jury trial. The Texas judge agreed with SpaceX’s​ arguments and ruled⁤ in their favor, stating that judges must be appointed by the president and confirmed by the U.S. Senate.

This ruling is a significant victory for SpaceX, as it effectively ​halts the​ DOJ’s lawsuit. It ‍also highlights the⁣ ongoing legal battles⁤ that can ‍arise in ⁢the competitive and ever-evolving space​ industry. While SpaceX has faced accusations of discrimination ‍in the past,‍ the‌ company remains committed to its mission of ​advancing space exploration and breaking barriers in​ the industry.

As ⁤SpaceX continues to make groundbreaking achievements in space technology, it is crucial for the⁢ company to ensure that its hiring practices align with legal requirements. The court ruling‍ serves as a reminder of the importance of fair and inclusive hiring ‍practices in all ⁢aspects ‌of the workforce.

In conclusion, the recent court ruling in favor of SpaceX halting the ​DOJ’s ⁣hiring⁤ discrimination⁣ lawsuit is a significant win for the company. Elon Musk’s frustrations⁤ with the DOJ’s⁤ actions ​highlight the potential political motivations


Read More From Original Article Here: SpaceX Countersues Hiring Discrimination Lawsuit By DOJ

" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker