Sorority Terminates Membership Of Two Alumnae After They Supported Lawsuit To Boot Trans-Identifying Member
Two Women Expelled from Sorority for Advocating for Biological Women Only
In a shocking turn of events, Patsy Levang and Cheryl Tuck-Smith, long-time members of Kappa Kappa Gamma, have been removed from the sorority for their unwavering support of allowing only biological women as members. These two women, who had dedicated 50 years of their lives to the sisterhood, were expelled after backing a lawsuit against the inclusion of Artemis Langford, a trans-identifying biological male, in the sorority.
Expressing her disappointment, Levang stated, “My heart was saddened when the current six council members voted me out. However, I will not be quiet about the truth.” Tuck-Smith echoed these sentiments, feeling both hurt and disturbed by the sorority’s transformation into a political tool rather than an organization that uplifts women.
Their expulsion, determined by national leadership, has left many questioning the sorority’s commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion. Allie Coghan, another Kappa Kappa Gamma alumna and a plaintiff in the lawsuit, expressed her disappointment, emphasizing that this decision is a clear retaliation against women.
With the sorority’s decision being deemed “disappointing,” it raises concerns about where women can turn to for support if even women’s organizations fail to stand up for themselves. The lack of transparency from Kappa Kappa Gamma regarding the expulsion only adds to the confusion surrounding the matter.
This controversy stems from the sorority’s decision last September to allow Langford, a biological man identifying as a woman, to join the University of Wyoming chapter. This move prompted a lawsuit from six female members who alleged that Langford had engaged in voyeuristic behavior and had even exhibited visible signs of arousal during intimate situations.
Although the case was dismissed by a federal judge, it is now being reviewed by the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, leaving the fate of the sorority’s inclusivity policy uncertain.
Key Takeaways:
- Patsy Levang and Cheryl Tuck-Smith were expelled from Kappa Kappa Gamma for advocating for biological women only.
- Their expulsion raises concerns about the sorority’s commitment to diversity and inclusion.
- The decision has been deemed disappointing and a retaliation against women.
- The controversy stems from the inclusion of a trans-identifying biological male in the sorority.
- The case is now before the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals.
What defines a sorority and how does the inclusion of transgender individuals impact the nature and purpose of these spaces?
Owls are supposed to be a sisterhood that supports and uplifts women, but instead, they chose to prioritize political correctness over the rights and beliefs of their own members.”
This incident sheds light on the growing tension between the acceptance of transgender individuals and the preservation of traditional gender identities within social institutions. While society is progressing towards greater inclusion and acceptance of transgender individuals, it is important to acknowledge the rights of those who hold different beliefs and values.
The controversy surrounding the inclusion of Artemis Langford brings to the forefront the question of what defines a sorority. Sororities have historically been spaces for biological women to come together, form deep bonds of sisterhood, and support each other in various aspects of life. Levang and Tuck-Smith believed that the admission of a trans-identifying biological male would fundamentally alter the nature and purpose of the sorority.
Their concerns were not unfounded. Sororities foster a unique environment that allows women to freely express themselves and discuss issues that pertain to their specific experiences. By including individuals who identify as male, this safe space could be compromised. It is essential to respect the choices and rights of all individuals, but it is equally important to preserve the integrity and identity of the spaces that have been specifically created for certain groups.
The decision to expel Levang and Tuck-Smith highlights the challenges faced by individuals who are deemed “out of line” with prevailing ideologies, even within their own communities. In a society that claims to champion diversity and inclusivity, it is disheartening to see those who advocate for their own beliefs being silenced or cast aside. This incident sends a troubling message to members of the Sorority and other similar organizations, suggesting that freedom of speech and difference of opinion are not valued or protected.
It is critical to engage in open and respectful dialogue that addresses the concerns of all parties involved. Dismissing Levang and Tuck-Smith without considering their perspective undermines the principles of fairness and equality that should be central to any decision-making process. Efforts should be made to find a compromise that respects the rights of transgender individuals while also preserving the core values and history of the sisterhood.
This incident serves as a reminder that progress should not come at the expense of silencing differing opinions. Respect for diversity should extend to embracing the multiplicity of thoughts, beliefs, and values, even when they clash with mainstream narratives. Only through open and honest conversations can we hope to create a society that truly celebrates and accepts all individuals, regardless of their gender identity.
It is our hope that Kappa Kappa Gamma, and similar institutions, engage in meaningful discussions to address the concerns raised by Levang and Tuck-Smith. By embracing dialogue and understanding, we can work towards finding a solution that respects the rights and identities of all individuals while preserving the unique spaces that have been created for specific communities. Only through such conversations can we bridge the gap of understanding and build a more inclusive and united society.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...