The daily wire

Sen. Cotton: Only Massive Retaliation Can Halt Iran’s Attacks on US Forces

Senator Tom‍ Cotton ⁢Calls for Massive Retaliation Against Iran to⁣ Stop Attacks on U.S. Forces

In a ⁤recent interview, Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR)​ emphasized the need for a strong response to Iranian attacks on U.S. forces in the Middle ⁢East.​ He stated that the⁣ only way to put an end ⁤to these attacks is ‍through⁣ a “massive retaliation” against Iran.

During ‍his⁢ appearance on “Fox News Sunday,” Cotton highlighted the ‍alarming‌ number ‍of attacks launched by Iran and its proxies under President Joe Biden’s administration. ​He revealed that there have been‍ approximately 150 attacks, with 66 occurring ⁤since October 17.

Cotton​ expressed his frustration with the limited response from the U.S., stating ⁢that most of the retaliatory ‌strikes have targeted empty proxy warehouses or proxy forces in⁣ Iraq and Syria. He criticized President Biden ‌for seemingly avoiding Iranian casualties and suggested targeting ​Iranians operating in ‍Iraq ⁢and Syria as ‌well ​as​ threatening Iranian assets if the attacks persist.

Addressing concerns about escalating tensions, Cotton dismissed ​the fears of politicians ⁢who hesitate to take​ military ‌action ⁤against Iran. ​He cited historical examples, such as President Reagan sinking half of Iran’s navy and‌ the ‍killing of‌ Qasem Soleimani by former President ‌Donald Trump, which did not lead to all-out⁢ war but ‍rather deterred further ‌aggression from Iran.

Cotton emphasized the importance of sending​ a clear message to Iran and warned that ⁢if the threats ‍do not cease immediately,‍ the U.S. will escalate its actions and threaten Iranian assets.

The⁢ New York Times reported that ‌President Biden has rejected more ⁢aggressive bombing options proposed by the Pentagon due to concerns about provoking Iran.

⁣What alternative solutions or approaches could be ​considered to address the tensions and underlying⁣ issues between ‍the‍ United States and Iran, besides a massive retaliation

‍ E East. Cotton argued that Iran’s⁤ ongoing aggression poses a direct threat​ to American security ‍and ‍requires a significant and forceful retaliation.

As tensions‍ between the United ⁢States and Iran have escalated over the‌ past few years, Iran’s attacks on U.S. forces have become alarmingly frequent. The recent rocket‌ attack on the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad and the killing of an American contractor in Iraq⁤ have ‌further intensified concerns about Iran’s intentions and ⁢capability to harm American⁢ interests.

Senator ‌Cotton, known⁣ for his staunch ⁣stance on national security, asserted that the United States cannot afford to allow Iran⁢ to continue these attacks with impunity. He ⁤emphasized⁣ the need to protect American personnel and interests in‍ the region and to deter further Iranian aggression.

Cotton called for a massive retaliation against Iran, including targeting their military infrastructure and assets. He argued that a⁤ limited or restrained response​ would only embolden Iran, signaling weakness and encouraging further attacks. Instead, he advocated for a robust message ​to⁢ be sent,‍ one that would make Iran rethink⁢ its actions and consider the potential consequences.

The senator acknowledged⁣ the complexities ⁣and risks associated with military action, especially given Iran’s regional influence and its capability to retaliate. However, he stressed that the longer the United States tolerates Iran’s attacks, the more vulnerable American forces ‌and interests⁤ become.

Cotton also highlighted the importance of rallying international support for such a retaliatory response. ‍He⁣ called on the United States ⁣to ⁣work closely with its ‍allies in the region, as well as other global ‌partners who​ share the common goal of countering Iran’s aggression. By building a broad ‌coalition, Cotton believes that the United States can present a united front against Iran and send a clear message‍ that ‌its actions will not be tolerated.

Critics have raised‌ concerns‍ about the potential consequences of a forceful response, arguing that it could further escalate⁣ tensions and lead ⁢to unintended consequences, such as a wider conflict in the region. However, Cotton‍ believes that a strong ⁢response is ‌necessary to protect American lives and deter future⁣ attacks.

The senator’s⁤ call for massive retaliation against Iran has sparked ⁢a vigorous debate among policymakers and experts. While some ⁤support Cotton’s assertive approach, others caution ​against the potential risks ⁢and urge for diplomatic solutions ⁤to address the underlying issues. ⁣However, one thing remains clear:⁢ Iran’s attacks on⁤ U.S. forces cannot continue without ​a significant response.

As tensions continue to rise, it ‌remains to ‍be‌ seen how the United States will respond to Iran’s⁢ ongoing aggression.‌ Senator Cotton’s call⁤ for massive retaliation has added to the growing chorus of voices advocating for a robust reaction.‌ Whatever the outcome may be,⁢ one thing‍ is certain: the United⁤ States cannot ignore ⁤the threat posed by​ Iran and must take decisive action to⁤ protect its interests ⁢and ensure the safety of its personnel.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker