Senate Democrats challenge Republicans to oppose bill protecting IVF
Sens. Duckworth and Murray Push for Protection of IVF and Fertility Treatments
Sens. Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) and Patty Murray (D-WA) are making a bold move to safeguard in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and other fertility treatments. Their bill, the Access to Family Building Act, aims to guarantee access to IVF, overriding any state policies that restrict these services. This comes in response to a recent Alabama Supreme Court decision that controversially labeled cryogenically frozen embryos as “extrauterine children.”
The senators reintroduced the bill last month after it was initially blocked in 2022 by Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-MS). During a press conference, Duckworth, who has personally experienced the joys and challenges of motherhood through IVF, passionately expressed the importance of this legislation.
“IVF is the reason that I’ve gotten to experience the chaos and beauty and stress and joy that is motherhood.”
Despite the recent surge of Republicans embracing IVF following the Alabama decision, Duckworth has not received support from any GOP senators for her bill. Since she is calling for unanimous consent, just one Republican could block the legislation, potentially causing a divide within the party.
“If you truly care about the sanctity of families and protecting IVF, then you need to show it by not blocking this bill on the floor,”
Duckworth emphasized, urging her colleagues to prioritize the well-being of families.
The Democrats are strategically pushing for a vote on this legislation to bring attention to the Alabama issue and the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) emphasized the importance of protecting women, families, and reproductive freedom.
“Republicans own the disasters that emanate from Roe v. Wade, and Democrats are absolutely committed to doing everything we can to protect women, families, and reproductive freedom.”
Murray called on Republicans to support the bill through unanimous consent, highlighting the opportunity to restore the rights enshrined in Roe v. Wade and expand IVF care.
If a Republican objects to advancing the legislation, Duckworth suggested that a roll call vote be scheduled. This would hold senators accountable and make their stance on the issue clear.
“I would love a roll call vote. Let’s get them on the record.”
How does the recent Alabama Supreme Court decision regarding cryogenically frozen embryos impact individuals and couples undergoing IVF, and why is it important to prevent laws that restrict access to fertility treatments based on discriminatory grounds?
Ly introduced in 2019, stating that it is critical to ensure that individuals and couples struggling with infertility have access to comprehensive and affordable fertility treatments. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), approximately 6.1 million individuals in the United States struggle with infertility.
One of the key provisions of the Access to Family Building Act is the prohibition of discrimination by insurance companies against individuals seeking fertility treatments. Currently, only 17 states require insurance coverage for IVF, and even then, these mandates are often limited in scope. Many individuals are forced to pay out-of-pocket for expensive treatments, which can be financially burdensome and prohibitive for many families.
Furthermore, the bill seeks to prevent states from enacting laws that restrict access to fertility treatments based on discriminatory grounds. This is particularly important given the recent Alabama Supreme Court decision that treated cryogenically frozen embryos as “extrauterine children.” Such a decision not only disregards scientific understanding but also puts individuals and couples undergoing IVF at risk of legal, emotional, and financial consequences.
Senator Duckworth expressed her concerns regarding the Alabama Supreme Court decision, stating, “We cannot allow the rights of individuals and couples struggling with infertility to be undermined by these discriminatory measures. It is essential that we protect access to necessary fertility treatments and ensure that no one is denied the opportunity to build a family.”
In addition to the protection of fertility treatments, the bill also recognizes the need for comprehensive education and awareness about infertility and reproductive health. It calls for increased funding for research on infertility, support for public health initiatives, and improved access to educational resources for individuals and healthcare providers.
Critics argue that the Access to Family Building Act would infringe on states’ rights and interfere with the autonomy of healthcare providers. However, advocates contend that the federal government has a responsibility to address the significant barriers individuals face in accessing fertility treatments. They argue that consistent and comprehensive access to these treatments is essential for individuals and couples who long to start a family and should not be subject to the patchwork of state laws.
The bill has already garnered support from various advocacy organizations, including RESOLVE: The National Infertility Association and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. These organizations argue that the Access to Family Building Act represents an important step towards breaking down barriers to fertility treatment and ensuring that all individuals have the opportunity to become parents.
As the debate continues, it is clear that Sen. Duckworth and Sen. Murray are committed to protecting the rights of individuals struggling with infertility. Their efforts with the Access to Family Building Act are a crucial step forward in guaranteeing access to comprehensive and affordable fertility treatments nationwide and ensuring that no one is denied the opportunity to build a family due to restrictive state policies or discrimination.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."