The daily wire

Harvard Corporation, known for its secrecy, under scrutiny for supporting Claudine Gay

The Harvard Corporation Faces ‌Pressure to Address Controversy Surrounding President Claudine Gay

The secretive board known as the ⁤Harvard Corporation, which made the⁣ decision to retain Harvard president⁤ Claudine Gay despite revelations of plagiarism and controversial⁣ statements about anti-Semitism, is now under increased scrutiny to take more proactive measures in addressing the issue.

Tracy Palandjian, a nonprofit founder, and Paul Finnegan, a private-equity executive, two members of the⁢ board, recently met with academics who demanded stronger action to repair the school’s damaged reputation, as an increasing number of donors expressed their dissatisfaction with the situation.

According to The New York Times, Jeff Flier, the former dean of Harvard Medical School, urged the board members ​to be more transparent and proactive, stating, “If people are criticizing the university,​ they are‍ ultimately criticizing you!”

Palandjian reportedly emphasized that simply replacing Gay would not be enough‍ and that the university needed a “generational change.”

Penny ​Pritzker, another board member who supported Gay’s hiring, previously served as the secretary of‌ commerce in the Barack Obama administration.

While the revelations of Gay’s plagiarism came to light ​in mid-December after her appearance before Congress on the topic of anti-Semitism, the Harvard Corporation had been investigating her academic work since October, following allegations brought forward ⁤by a New York Post reporter.

The Times reported that when asked about publicly reaffirming their support for‍ Dr. Gay, a Harvard spokesperson stated that the ⁣corporation had nothing ⁤to add ⁤beyond their statement from December 12, ⁣which expressed support for ⁤Gay and preceded the latest wave of plagiarism allegations.

Meanwhile, prominent Harvard donor Bill Ackman, who donated $26 million to the university in 2014, tweeted that he⁤ had heard from a reliable source that the corporation had asked Gay to resign, but she had refused. Ackman also mentioned that Gay had retained ⁢her own legal counsel and threatened to sue‌ if fired.

“I have ⁢heard‍ from a source that ​is ‌reliable but a step or two removed from the situation that the ‍Harvard Corporation has⁣ asked⁣ President Gay to resign and she has refused. Gay has ⁤apparently said that if she is fired, she will sue. Gay has retained her own counsel.⁣ I can’t 100% confirm the above is true, but if it is, ​I am‌ sure the Board is concerned about what may emerge in legal discovery in the​ event of litigation. At ​this⁤ point, however, what choice does ​the Board⁣ have? If the Board ⁤makes an inappropriate deal on⁤ severance ⁤or gives Gay a guaranteed⁤ position⁣ at Harvard,‌ it will look like a payoff to ⁤keep her quiet.

I can’t see how ⁤she stays ‍at Harvard in any capacity. President Gay’s ⁢performance and her academic record issues⁣ provide plenty of cause for termination ⁣without compensation. But at every step so far, ⁣the Board has made the wrong call and dug a deeper hole for‍ themselves and Harvard. As we all know, the best​ time to start making good decisions is⁢ now. The sooner Gay ‍is gone, the⁤ sooner repairing the‍ damage can begin.”

Bill Ackman’s tweet further fueled speculation about the situation, suggesting​ that the board’s decisions thus far have only ‌worsened the situation and that⁢ it is crucial for them to take appropriate action promptly.

‍Why are some board members, like Tracy ⁢Palandjian, emphasizing⁤ the ‍need for a “generational change” at ‌the university‌ instead of solely replacing President Gay?

P>Despite the controversy surrounding President Claudine Gay, the Harvard Corporation has ⁣been cautious in its response, choosing to retain⁣ her despite the serious issues that have arisen. This decision has not gone unnoticed, and pressure is mounting on the⁤ secretive board to take further actions to address the situation.

Two ⁢members of the board, Tracy Palandjian and Paul Finnegan, recently held a meeting with academics to discuss the matter. These academics, who are deeply concerned about the damage to the ⁤school’s reputation, demanded more proactive measures to rectify the situation.⁤ In addition, an increasing number of donors have expressed their dissatisfaction with the ‍board’s handling of⁢ the controversy.

The former dean of Harvard Medical School, Jeff Flier, is among those calling ⁢for transparency and action from the board. In a statement directed at the board members, Flier emphasized that any criticism of the university ultimately reflects back on them. He urged them to take the necessary ⁣steps to address the issue⁢ and⁣ restore faith in the institution.

Palandjian, one of⁤ the board members, acknowledged that simply replacing Gay would not be enough. She stressed the need for a “generational change” at the university. This implies that the issues at hand run deeper than just the actions of one individual and that a more substantial transformation is ‌required to overcome the current controversy.

It is worth noting that Penny Pritzker, another board member, previously served as ⁢the secretary of commerce in the Obama administration. Her support for Gay’s hiring ⁤suggests that she may have had insight⁣ into the controversy surrounding Gay from her ​time⁣ in the Obama administration.

The revelation of Gay’s plagiarism⁤ initially came to ‍light in mid-December​ after her appearance before Congress to discuss anti-Semitism. ⁢However, the Harvard Corporation had been investigating her academic work since​ October, prompted by allegations made by a New York Post reporter.

As⁣ the ‌scrutiny‍ surrounding President Claudine Gay continues to intensify, the Harvard ‍Corporation is under increasing pressure to take more proactive measures to address​ the controversy.‍ The demands for transparency, accountability, and ultimately a resolution to this issue are becoming louder as more individuals ⁢express their dissatisfaction ⁤with the board’s decisions. It remains to be seen how ‌the ‌board will respond ‍and whether they will be able to restore faith in the institution and its leadership.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker