SCOTUS OKs Biden’s Bid to Remove Border Razor Wire


(Photo by John Moore/Getty Images)

OAN’s Abril Elfi
3:42‌ PM – ⁣Monday, January 22, 2024

The⁣ Supreme Court⁤ Allows Removal of Razor Wire on US-Mexico Border

Advertisement

On Monday, the Supreme Court approved in a 5-4 decision to‍ remove⁤ the razor wire stationed by Governor Greg Abbott (R-Texas.).

Chief Justice ⁣John Roberts, Justice Amy ⁢Coney Barrett, ⁣Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Justice Ketanji Brown⁤ Jackson and Justice Elena Kegan voted to approve ‌the request.

The border dispute intensified earlier this⁤ month, when the Texas National​ Guard and the ⁤Texas Department ⁣of Public Safety installed fences ⁢and razor ⁤wire in a riverside park in Eagle Pass,‍ Texas. The primary ‍boat ramp in the⁣ area is located in the park, ⁢which was closed to the U.S. Border Patrol agents by​ state law enforcement.

The situation worsened once more ‌when⁣ three migrants—a woman⁢ and two children—drowned in the‌ Rio Grande just outside the‌ park. According to Border Patrol officials, Texas National Guard members‌ blocked federal officials from reaching the river to save the migrants.

Barrett, ​who was appointed to the court by 45th President Donald Trump, faced backlash‍ after siding with President Joe⁣ Biden.

Lawyer Marina Medvin criticized ⁤Barrett and Roberts for supporting the Biden Administration on the decision to remove⁣ the razor wire.

“Wow. SCOTUS Justices Roberts and Barrett sided ⁢with the left wing and have allowed Biden’s federal‍ officers⁢ to ​continue removing‍ the border‍ fencing erected by the state of Texas while the case is pending,” ‍Medvin wrote. “Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh, and Gorsuch would have prevented the feds from doing so.

Stay​ informed!​ Receive breaking ⁢news blasts‍ directly to your inbox for free. Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts

⁤ Share this post!

West Virginia’s Attorney General Dominates Fundraising and Polls in Governor Race

World Economic Forum Raises Concerns About “Disease ⁤X” Release

Planned Parenthood Whistleblower’s​ Eye-Opening Experience as Abortion Director

President of Students For Life Empowers Young Advocates in Fight⁣ Against Abortion

AI ​Startup ‍ElevenLabs Achieves Unicorn Status with Surging Investor Interest

Binance to Face SEC in ⁤High-Profile⁤ Crypto Exchange Hearing

WEF Executives Grapple with Monetizing Early Demos

Apple Overtakes Samsung as World’s Largest Seller of Smartphones

rnrn

What⁣ were the factors that led ‌to the decision by the Supreme Court to allow the removal ​of razor wire on the US-Mexico border?

The decision made​ by the Supreme ⁢Court⁣ to ⁢allow the removal of razor wire on ‍the US-Mexico border ⁢has sparked controversy and raised concerns about border security. On Monday, ‍in a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court approved the ⁤removal of the ​razor wire, which⁣ was installed by Governor Greg Abbott of Texas.

The border dispute escalated‍ when the Texas National Guard and the ⁢Texas Department⁤ of Public Safety installed fences and razor wire‌ in ⁢a riverside park in Eagle Pass, Texas. ‌The ‍park, which‌ houses the primary boat ⁣ramp in the area, was closed to US Border Patrol ​agents⁣ by state ​law ‌enforcement.

The situation took a tragic turn when three ‍migrants, including a woman and two children,‍ drowned in ⁤the Rio Grande just outside the park. Border Patrol officials disclosed that Texas National ​Guard members blocked‍ federal⁤ officials from reaching⁣ the river ‌to‌ rescue⁤ the migrants.

Chief Justice ⁢John⁣ Roberts, Justice Amy ⁣Coney Barrett,‌ Justice ‍Sonia Sotomayor, Justice Ketanji⁢ Brown Jackson, and Justice Elena Kagan voted in favor ‍of removing the razor wire. This decision has drawn criticism, especially towards Barrett, who was ‌appointed by former‍ President ​Donald Trump but sided with President‌ Joe Biden​ in this case.

Lawyer‍ Marina Medvin criticized Justice Barrett and Justice Roberts for supporting‌ the Biden ‌Administration’s stance on removing ‌the razor ⁤wire. ⁢Medvin expressed her astonishment that Justices Thomas, ‍Alito, Kavanaugh, and Gorsuch would have⁢ prevented federal officers from removing‌ the border fencing erected by the state of Texas.

The removal of the razor wire‍ has raised concerns among those who advocate for strong border ⁢security.⁢ Critics argue that the decision sends a⁤ message​ of leniency towards ⁢illegal immigration and potentially endangers ‌national security.

The Supreme Court’s decision in this case reflects the ongoing debate and⁣ tension surrounding border security. It highlights the competing interests‍ of protecting national borders and ‍ensuring the humane treatment of migrants.

As this ⁣debate ⁢continues, it is crucial for ⁣policymakers to find a ⁢balance between border security⁣ and compassionate⁣ immigration policies. The complexities of immigration require ⁤thoughtful ‌and comprehensive ⁤solutions⁢ that prioritize ⁤the safety ​and well-being​ of both citizens and migrants.

Ultimately, the Supreme Court’s decision‌ on ​the ⁢removal of razor ⁢wire on the US-Mexico border further emphasizes ⁣the ‌need for comprehensive⁤ immigration reform and a robust dialogue on border security. It serves as a reminder that immigration policies continue to be a significant challenge for policymakers and ​require careful ⁢consideration⁢ and collaboration​ to achieve a just and effective system.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker