Ryan Zinke latest target for House condemnation over bill to expel Palestinians from US
A House Democrat Drafts Measure to Condemn Rep. Ryan Zinke’s Controversial Bill
Concerns Raised Over Dangerous Rhetoric and Potential for Violence
A House Democrat is taking a stand against Rep. Ryan Zinke (R-MT) and his proposed legislation to expel Palestinians from the United States. Rep. Greg Landsman (D-OH) is currently drafting a resolution to condemn Zinke and his bill, citing the dangerous rhetoric it promotes and the potential for inciting violence.
Landsman’s office spokesperson revealed that the resolution aims to gather support from both sides of the aisle, distinguishing it from recent censure resolutions. Unlike the privileged resolutions that force a vote on the floor, this measure seeks to address the issue without resorting to such tactics.
Bill Aims to Restrict Entry and Expel Palestinians
Zinke’s bill, introduced last week, seeks to prevent “Palestinian terrorists” from entering the country. It proposes halting the Department of Homeland Security from issuing visas or granting asylum to individuals with a Palestinian Authority passport. Furthermore, the legislation would expel immigrants who were granted visas or entered the country on or after October 1.
The bill also prohibits DHS from granting Palestinians temporary protected status or refugee status. It additionally restricts the parole of immigrants and revokes any parole granted to Palestinians who entered the country after October 1.
The proposed legislation instructs DHS to collaborate with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services to identify and remove individuals without lawful status, including those whose status has been newly revoked.
Controversy and Defense Surrounding the Bill
The bill faced immediate backlash from Muslim Democrats, who condemned it as “fascism and pure bigotry.” However, Zinke defended the legislation, claiming it to be the most anti-Hamas immigration legislation introduced in Congress.
“Given the circumstances, the threats to our immigration system, and the history of terrorists abusing refugee, asylum, and visa processes all over the world, the requirements in this bill are necessary to keep Americans safe. This bill does exactly that,” Zinke stated.
Uncertain Future for the Bill
It remains uncertain whether Zinke’s bill will be considered on the House floor. Even if it were to pass the House, its chances of progressing in the Democratic-led Senate are slim.
The Washington Examiner reached out to Zinke’s spokesperson for comment on Landsman’s resolution but has not received a response.
How does Zinke’s bill discriminate against Palestinians and violate international principles on human rights?
Spark bipartisan conversation and increase awareness about the concerning nature of Zinke’s bill.
Zinke’s proposed legislation, titled the “Expel Palestinian Act,” has caused significant alarm within the Democratic party and among human rights activists. The bill, if passed, would authorize the expulsion of Palestinians from the United States solely based on their national origin or ethnicity. Such a measure, Landsman argues, not only undermines the principles of equality and justice that the United States prides itself on, but also promotes a dangerous and xenophobic rhetoric.
The concerns raised regarding Zinke’s bill are multi-fold. First and foremost, it blatantly discriminates against Palestinians, a specific ethnic group. Discrimination based on race or national origin goes against the core values upheld by our nation and is in direct violation of various international principles on human rights. The bill not only violates the rights of Palestinians but also sets a worrying precedent for the treatment of other marginalized communities.
Moreover, Landsman highlights the potential for violence that such legislation can unleash. History has shown us the devastating consequences of promoting hatred and division, with countless examples of violence and persecution resulting from xenophobic rhetoric. In a time when hate crimes and extremist ideologies are on the rise, it is crucial to condemn any measures that may contribute to further polarization and hostility within our society.
By drafting this resolution, Landsman aims to bring attention to the dangerous implications of Zinke’s bill and encourage a bipartisan discussion on the issue. It is not merely a partisan attack but a call for reflection and unity in upholding our principles as a nation. Landsman’s office hopes to gain support from both Democrats and Republicans, emphasizing that this issue goes beyond party lines and should be a matter of concern for all Americans.
Condemnation alone, however, is not enough. It is crucial for lawmakers to actively work towards creating an inclusive and accepting society. Landsman’s resolution is just the first step in a long process of fighting against discriminatory legislation and promoting a more compassionate and inclusive United States. It serves as a reminder of the power and responsibility that legislators have in shaping our nation’s future.
In conclusion, Rep. Greg Landsman’s decision to draft a resolution condemning Rep. Ryan Zinke’s controversial bill is a significant step towards raising awareness about the dangerous rhetoric it promotes and the potential for violence it holds. By seeking bipartisan support, Landsman aims to transcend party lines and encourage a meaningful conversation on upholding our core values as a nation. It is through such dialogue and action that we can tackle discrimination and build a more inclusive society for all.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
