Marc Elias, lawyer in Russia hoax case, acknowledges Trump’s inability to secure a fair jury in D.C. trial
Left-wing election disrupter Marc Elias, known for his efforts to undermine New York elections, made a surprising admission on Sunday. He acknowledged that former President Donald Trump would not receive a fair trial in Washington D.C.
The Biden Department of Justice is aggressively pursuing charges against Trump, including those related to his speech about the 2020 presidential election on January 6, 2021.
[READ NEXT: The Entire Premise Of Trump’s J6 Trial Is An Affront To Free Elections And Rule Of Law]
Elias, whose legal campaigns are often funded by left-wing billionaire George Soros, took to social media to highlight the challenges Trump would face in the deep-blue district. He shared a screenshot showing that Trump received only 676 votes in the GOP primary, out of a city population of 700,000. A tough jury pool indeed.
In a city of 700,000, Donald Trump got 676 votes in the GOP primary. A tough jury pool…. pic.twitter.com/oHNHa0mF2n
While Elias may have intended to make a political point about the Republican primary, his post raises constitutional concerns about Trump’s chances of receiving a fair trial in such a heavily Democratic district.
Can Trump Get a Fair Trial?
The Sixth Amendment explicitly requires that defendants have the right to an “impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed.”
But the question remains: Can Trump truly expect a fair trial?
Trump’s legal team argues that it would be impossible for him to receive an impartial jury in a city where President Joe Biden received 92.1 percent of the vote, compared to Trump’s 5.4 percent.
In fact, the Supreme Court recognized in the 1971 case Groppi v. Wisconsin that there are situations where “only a change of venue [is] constitutionally sufficient to assure the kind of impartial jury” required by the Sixth and 14th Amendments.
The court has previously ruled in Rideau v. Louisiana that denying a request for a change of venue constitutes a denial of due process. This precedent has been applied to federal trials in Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart and United States v. Faul, as noted by The University of Chicago Law Review.
However, it’s not just the jury pool that poses a potential threat to a fair trial for the former president.
Judge Tanya Chutkan, who presides over the case, has expressed frustration over Trump’s continued freedom. During a 2021 sentencing hearing for January 6 defendants, she remarked that “the people who exhorted you and encouraged you and rallied you to go and take action and to fight have not been charged.”
Chutkan also stated during the sentencing of another January 6 defendant, Christine Priola, that the individuals who stormed the Capitol were loyal to one man, not to the Constitution or the principles of democracy. She emphasized that this person, referring to Trump, remains free to this day.
Trump requested that Chutkan recuse herself from the case, but she denied the motion.
Brianna Lyman is an elections correspondent at The Federalist.
How might the political climate and overwhelming liberal majority in Washington D.C. contribute to the difficulty of ensuring a fair trial for Trump?
E he received only a minuscule number of votes in the GOP primary. With such a heavily Democratic population, the likelihood of finding jurors who do not hold a bias against him is slim.
Furthermore, the bias against Trump in Washington D.C. is not limited to the voting population. The city itself is known to be overwhelmingly Democratic, with a significant majority of residents identifying as liberals. This political climate creates an environment where it may be difficult, if not impossible, for Trump to receive a fair trial.
The concerns about a fair trial for Trump are not unfounded. Throughout his presidency, Trump faced significant opposition and hostility from many Democratic politicians, as well as a large portion of the media. This intense polarization and public sentiment against Trump could potentially influence the impartiality of a jury in Washington D.C.
Additionally, the charges brought against Trump by the Biden Department of Justice related to his speech on January 6, 2021, further complicate the idea of a fair trial. The highly charged and politically divisive nature of the events on that day may make it challenging to find jurors who have not formed preconceived notions about Trump’s culpability.
It is essential to remember that the right to a fair trial is a fundamental principle of the American justice system. Every defendant, regardless of their political affiliations or public image, deserves the opportunity to present their case before an impartial jury.
In the case of former President Donald Trump, the concerns raised by Marc Elias regarding the fairness of a trial in Washington D.C. should be taken seriously. The heavy Democratic bias in the city, combined with the political climate and the specific charges brought against Trump, raise valid constitutional concerns about his ability to receive a fair and impartial trial.
As the legal proceedings unfold, it is crucial to ensure that the principles of the Sixth Amendment are upheld. The impartiality and fairness of the trial are key to preserving the integrity of the American justice system, and no defendant should be denied their constitutional right to a fair trial.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
