DeSantis pledges to relocate Dept. of Agriculture if elected President

Florida Gov. ⁣Ron DeSantis Promises to Shake Up Washington, D.C. Bureaucracy ⁣as President

In a bold move reminiscent of President Donald ⁤Trump, ⁣Gov. Ron⁣ DeSantis plans to tackle the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and⁣ relocate the ⁢entire agency to real farm ‌country, away from the confines ⁢of Washington, D.C.

DeSantis declared, “When I’m President, Iowa will have first dibs on the ‍Department of Agriculture.” He believes that the USDA should be staffed by individuals who truly understand agriculture and farming, rather than bureaucrats with ​their own agendas.

When I’m President, Iowa will have ‌first dibs on the ​Department of Agriculture.

An agency like the USDA should be staffed ⁤by Americans who understand agriculture and farming, not⁢ pointy-headed bureaucrats imposing an agenda. pic.twitter.com/xc3A0RuIM9

— Ron DeSantis (@RonDeSantis) December 14, ⁣2023

In a video message, DeSantis expressed his desire to relocate several federal agencies outside of ⁢D.C. to better serve ‌the ⁣American people. He suggested ‍moving the civil rights division of ‍the Justice Department to Oklahoma and the Department of Agriculture to Iowa, among other changes.

This vision resonates with many conservatives who have longed for a shift of power away from Washington.

Should the Department of Agriculture​ be Moved Out ⁣of D.C.?

• Yes
• No

In‍ a stunning move, former President Trump relocated the Bureau of Land Management headquarters to Colorado as part of his “drain the swamp” initiative. However, the bureau was promptly moved back to D.C. when Joe Biden’s administration took over,⁢ as reported by The Hill.

While moving federal agencies out of D.C. is a step in the right direction, many ⁣conservatives advocate for ⁣their complete elimination. GOP presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy, for ‍example,⁢ aims to defund and ⁣shut down the Department of ⁣Education, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, the IRS, and the scandal-ridden FBI, according to ABC News.

DeSantis shares this sentiment and ⁣also targets the Departments of Commerce and‍ Energy for potential elimination. In an interview with Fox News, he expressed his willingness ‍to use these departments to combat woke ideology and leftism⁢ infiltrating American institutions.

Relocating these agencies is ⁤just the beginning. The true benefit to our nation‌ would come from their elimination altogether.

The article Ron DeSantis Vows to Ship Dept. of Agriculture Out of DC if Elected President – Here’s ⁤Where He’d Move⁤ It was originally published on The Western Journal.

What are the ⁣potential benefits of relocating⁢ federal agencies to areas directly impacted by their work?

Ther agencies. DeSantis believes ​that moving these agencies to areas​ that are directly impacted by their work will lead to better ‌decision-making and policies that⁣ benefit ⁣the American people.

The‌ decision to relocate the USDA to ⁣Iowa is a strategic one. Iowa is ⁣known ​as the agricultural heartland ⁢of the United States, with a rich history of farming and a⁣ deep understanding‍ of the ⁢challenges and opportunities in the industry. By having the USDA‌ headquartered in Iowa, DeSantis aims to‌ ensure⁣ that the agency is staffed ​by individuals who have firsthand experience and knowledge in ⁤agriculture and farming.

DeSantis strongly ‍criticizes the current‍ system where bureaucrats⁣ in Washington, D.C. ⁣make decisions that have a profound impact on the livelihood of farmers and agricultural communities. He argues that these bureaucrats do not‌ fully comprehend the complexities ⁤of agricultural practices and ⁢often impose their own agendas, which may not align with the needs and priorities of⁢ the farming community.

The move to​ relocate the USDA is ⁤reminiscent of‍ President Donald Trump’s efforts to shake up the establishment and prioritize the interests of everyday‌ Americans. Trump also aimed to decentralize power ‍in Washington, ‌D.C. and bring⁢ decision-making closer to the people ⁢who are directly affected by‍ those decisions.

DeSantis’s promise to shake ⁣up the Washington,⁢ D.C. bureaucracy by relocating⁣ the USDA to Iowa is a bold and⁢ audacious move. If he ⁤were to become President, ‌it would⁢ signal a significant shift in the ​way⁤ federal agencies ​operate ⁢and would prioritize the needs of specific communities over the traditional concentration of power⁢ in⁤ the nation’s capital.

However, it is important ⁤to note that relocating federal agencies is ‍a complex⁢ and challenging process. It requires careful planning and‌ consideration of various factors, such as the availability⁤ of infrastructure, the⁤ impact on the‍ local economy, and the potential disruption to the agency’s⁤ operations. Any decision​ to relocate⁢ the USDA or other federal agencies should be based‍ on a thorough analysis ‌of these factors to ensure that it ⁤benefits both the agency and the communities it serves.

In conclusion, Governor Ron DeSantis’s ‌promise to shake up the Washington, D.C. bureaucracy by relocating the USDA ⁢to Iowa is‌ a bold ⁢move that​ aims ‍to prioritize the needs of the agricultural community. By moving the agency to an area​ with deep agricultural knowledge and‍ experience, DeSantis ‍hopes to ensure that the USDA is staffed by individuals who understand and can effectively ​address​ the challenges ​faced by farmers and the agricultural industry. While this promise reflects a desire for decentralization and better decision-making, any⁢ decision to relocate federal agencies should be carefully considered to ensure its success.