Rich Eisen criticizes college presidents for their alarming responses regarding advocating for the genocide of Jews
Rich Eisen Slams College Presidents for “Frightening” Responses on Genocide
Rich Eisen, the renowned sports host, usually sticks to discussing sports. However, during a recent episode of the “Rich Eisen Show,” he felt compelled to address a disturbing issue. Eisen criticized the responses given by top college presidents when asked if advocating for the genocide of Jews was acceptable.
In a congressional hearing, university presidents from Harvard, Penn State, and MIT were questioned about whether calling for “genocide” violated their respective campus codes of conduct and rules on bullying and harassment. Eisen condemned their “unacceptable responses,” which suggested that the acceptability of such speech depended on context.
Eisen found it alarming that the school officials couldn’t unequivocally state that advocating for genocide violated their codes of conduct. He described their answers as “equivocating with a bunch of word salad and nonsense.”
The sports journalist expressed his concern, asking, “So, do we have to wait for an actual genocide to occur before taking action?” He emphasized the importance of unequivocally opposing all forms of genocide. Eisen argued that by allowing such speech, these universities inadvertently create an environment where people feel comfortable committing acts of genocide.
Today, @richeisen took time out from our usual show fare to respond to the unacceptable responses from @penn @harvard @MIT presidents at a US House hearing about anti-semitism on campus. pic.twitter.com/YUwltJhy9W
— Rich Eisen Show (@RichEisenShow) December 6, 2023
Eisen further emphasized his point by drawing on his experiences visiting museums of tolerance and Holocaust museums in Berlin, Germany, and Tel Aviv, Israel. He expressed disbelief that leaders of prestigious educational institutions needed to be reminded of the importance of unequivocally opposing genocide.
He continued, “It is frightening to see those answers from people in leadership and higher education. Are you kidding me? The answer is yes when you’re advocating against genocide against anybody. That’s a violation of the code of conduct and a form of harassment and bullying. Forget the context.”
Eisen revealed that he had family members who attended these universities, and he had previously considered encouraging his own children to follow in their footsteps. However, after witnessing the responses from the school presidents, he changed his mind.
“I never thought in a million years that I would never want to send my kids to these schools. Forget that,” Eisen concluded.
What did Harvard President Lawrence Bacow mean by “context matters” when discussing the acceptability of advocating for genocide on their campus?
Cused on the responses given by Harvard President Lawrence Bacow, who stated that advocating for genocide would be considered unacceptable on their campus, but also added that “context matters.” Eisen found this response to be particularly troubling, as he believed it implied that there could be situations in which advocating for genocide might be acceptable.
Furthermore, Eisen expressed his disappointment with the responses from Penn State President Eric Barron and MIT President L. Rafael Reif. Both presidents acknowledged that advocating for genocide would violate their respective campus codes of conduct, but also emphasized the importance of free speech and the need to engage in a thoughtful dialogue about controversial topics. Eisen criticized this approach, stating that there should be no tolerance for advocating for such horrific acts.
Eisen highlighted the importance of leaders, especially those in academic institutions, taking a firm stance against hate speech and genocide advocacy. He argued that these college presidents have a responsibility to condemn any form of bigotry and to protect the well-being and safety of their students.
While acknowledging the importance of free speech and open discussions, Eisen stressed the fact that there are certain boundaries that should never be crossed. Advocating for genocide is one such boundary that should never be tolerated.
In conclusion, Rich Eisen, known for his expertise in sports, has taken a strong position against the responses given by top college presidents regarding the acceptability of advocating for genocide. He believes that their “frightening” and unacceptable responses undermine the values of inclusivity, tolerance, and respect for human life. Eisen calls on leaders in academia, and society as a whole, to take a stand against hate speech and to unequivocally condemn any form of support for genocidal ideologies.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
