Republicans Push Legislation to Prevent Ranked-Choice Voting in Oklahoma Elections

In a decisive move, the Oklahoma⁢ House with⁢ a Republican majority has passed a‌ bill that aims to steer clear ⁣of ranked-choice voting, a method they fear could complicate elections.

HB 3156 explicitly​ bans the use of ranked-choice voting systems by any entity tasked with conducting elections within the state, favoring the retention of Oklahoma’s⁣ traditional voting methods. The bill garnered significant support, evidenced by a 63-16 vote, though ‍not without dissent from⁢ within the GOP and across ⁢the ⁣aisle.

The ​proposed legislation is now on its way to the Senate, where it ⁣will undergo further scrutiny.

Ranked-choice voting (RCV), while aimed at ensuring majority support for elected officials, requires voters to rank their candidates by​ preference and involves‌ a process of elimination and⁢ vote redistribution⁤ until a candidate emerges with over half⁣ the votes.

What’s ‌at​ Stake with HB⁣ 3156?

The ​reach of HB⁣ 3156 is extensive – ⁤it ​seeks to invalidate any local government approvals of ranked-choice voting and declare any‌ such elections void. Furthermore,⁢ should any infraction occur, ‌legal remedies are outlined to preserve the‍ integrity of the state’s ​election ​process.

The Backdrop⁣ of the Bill

While RCV is not currently used in any Oklahoma elections, proponents of HB 3156, like Representative Eric Roberts,‌ assert that preemptive action is ⁤necessary ⁣to maintain the straightforwardness and reliability of ​the voting process,​ particularly when it comes to recounts.

Critics, including Bill sponsor Roberts, argue that ⁤ranked-choice voting⁤ has historically ​led to confusion and delays in finalizing ‌election results and has potential ⁤vulnerabilities that can challenge ⁤the legitimacy of ⁣outcomes.

“Ranked-choice voting‌ makes voting more confusing and has delayed election results ​everywhere ⁣it has been tried.” – Rep. Eric Roberts
⁣

Instances from⁣ other regions ⁤illustrate some of ‌the pitfalls ⁢associated with RCV. In​ Oakland, a significant blunder led to ⁤a two-month delay in determining the rightful winner of an election. ⁢Meanwhile, a Utah ⁣town’s pilot project saw an alarming rate ‍of discarded ballots due ‍to the complexity of the system.

A deep-dive into the implications of RCV by experts revealed⁤ the phenomenon of ‘ballot exhaustion’ – where voters‍ who do not rank all candidates often have their votes‌ discarded in subsequent rounds if their top choices are eliminated ⁤early on.

Moreover, there are examples where RCV results seemed not‍ to align with ⁢the majority preference, as seen in some high-profile​ races in Alaska ​and Maine.

If HB 3156 ‌successfully passes the​ Senate and receives the Governor’s signature, Oklahoma will join a handful of ‍states that‍ have turned⁢ away from‌ ranked-choice voting, potentially shaping the future landscape of how Americans vote.

Shawn Fleetwood is a staff writer for The Federalist and a graduate⁢ of the University⁢ of Mary Washington. His insightful commentary has been featured in various publications, including RealClearPolitics and Conservative Review. Follow his sharp analysis on‍ Twitter ⁢@ShawnFleetwood.