GOP Candidates Should Criticize CNN in Debates
Imagine if there was a national news network that had a clear agenda to undermine a major political party and label its voters as extremists who pose a threat to democracy. Now picture that same network being chosen by that political party to host not just one, but two presidential debates right before the first primaries. Well, that’s exactly what’s happening with the Republican National Committee (RNC) contracting with CNN to run the GOP’s next two prime-time showdowns in January.
Just hours after the final four candidates left the debate stage in Alabama, CNN proudly announced that they had been selected to program the next two forums.
The first debate is scheduled for January 10 at Drake University in Des Moines, Iowa, less than a week before the Iowa caucuses. The second debate will take place on January 21 at St. Anselm College in Goffstown, New Hampshire.
So, what do Republican voters think about the RNC’s decision to have CNN moderate these debates? Are they concerned that the party has chosen a network that has become a platform for partisan operatives on the Jan. 6 Committee? Are they worried that the network, known for promoting the Russia hoax, will now be in charge of the final forums for the Republican primary? Or perhaps it’s the network’s habit of smearing Republican voters as white supremacists that is most offensive. Surprisingly, the higher-ups at the RNC seem unfazed by any of these concerns.
The remaining Republican candidates should respond to the RNC’s choice by boycotting the debates. However, it’s likely that only Trump will stay off the stage. Those who do attend should use their airtime to criticize the network that epitomizes everything wrong with corporate media, just like Newt Gingrich did in the 2012 Republican debate in South Carolina when he called out CNN for starting the forum with a salacious question about his previous marriage.
In November, entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy made waves during an NBC-moderated debate by condemning the network’s coverage of the Russia hoax and demanding that RNC Chairwoman Ronna Romney McDaniel resign for choosing such an outlet to run the forum. Ramaswamy’s powerful moment on stage called out debate moderator Kristen Welker and questioned whether the Democrats would ever hire someone like Greg Gutfeld to host their debates. Welker was left speechless, and now it’s time for CNN to face the same scrutiny.
Let’s hold CNN accountable for its biased coverage, just like Ramaswamy did.
rnrn
Should the RNC prioritize confronting CNN’s bias or maintaining the integrity and fairness of the debate process when selecting a host for important events like these debates
Ry 28 at the University of Houston in Texas, just days before the Texas primary. These debates are crucial events for the Republican candidates as they try to win the support of voters and secure their party’s nomination for the presidency.
However, the selection of CNN as the host for these debates has raised concerns among many Republicans. CNN has long been accused of having a liberal bias and being hostile towards conservative viewpoints. Critics argue that the network’s programming and reporting often favor Democratic Party positions while portraying Republican politicians and policies in a negative light.
This raises questions about the fairness and impartiality of the debates. Should a news network with a perceived bias be given the responsibility of hosting these important events? Can we expect balanced and objective coverage from a network that has already shown a clear agenda against one of the major political parties?
Furthermore, the timing of these debates is also worrisome. By scheduling the debates right before the first primaries, the RNC is effectively giving CNN a platform to shape public opinion and influence voters at a critical moment in the election process. This can have a significant impact on the outcome of the primaries and ultimately, the nomination of the Republican candidate.
Some argue that the RNC’s decision to choose CNN as the host is a strategic move to challenge the network’s bias and push back against what they perceive as unfair treatment. They believe that by allowing CNN to host the debates, the Republican candidates will have an opportunity to confront the network directly and defend their positions.
However, others are concerned that this move only legitimizes CNN’s bias and gives it a stamp of approval. They argue that by contracting with a network that has already shown a clear agenda against them, the Republican Party is undermining its own credibility and allowing CNN to dictate the terms of the debate.
In the end, the selection of CNN as the host for the Republican debates raises important questions about media bias, fairness, and the integrity of the election process. It highlights the need for greater transparency and accountability in the selection of debate hosts and the coverage of political events.
As voters, we should demand unbiased and objective reporting, especially during such critical moments in our democratic process. The responsibility to ensure fair and balanced coverage lies not only with the media but also with the political parties and organizations involved in organizing these debates. It is essential that the process is transparent, impartial, and serves the best interests of the voters and democracy as a whole.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
