White House deceived about Joe Biden’s meeting and hosting of Hunter’s art dealer, says report
The White House’s Deceptive Art Deal: Hunter Biden’s Paintings and Political Connections
The art world is buzzing with controversy as new revelations emerge about Hunter Biden’s paintings. According to a recently released congressional synopsis, the gallerist responsible for selling Hunter’s artwork had close encounters with President Joe Biden himself, even attending a wedding hosted by the First Family at the White House.
The House Oversight Committee Republicans shared a summary of their interview with Georges Bergès, the New York City art dealer who sold Hunter’s paintings. In his testimony, Bergès claimed to have spoken with Joe Biden and even met him in person, including attending a wedding at the White House. These connections raise eyebrows and fuel speculation about the true nature of the art sales.
Back in July 2021, the White House assured the public that Hunter’s art sales would be conducted anonymously, with no knowledge of the buyers. This arrangement aimed to avoid any appearance of corruption or undue influence. However, according to The New York Times, Bergès was allowed to sell the paintings without disclosing any information about the buyers, including Hunter himself.
During his remarks before the House committee, Bergès contradicted the White House’s claims, stating that he had no communication with them regarding the art sales agreement. Furthermore, he confirmed that Hunter was aware of the identities of individuals who purchased a significant portion of his artwork, including prominent Democrat donors Kevin Morris and Elizabeth Hirsh Naftali.
If these revelations are true, it suggests that the administration and its media allies were engaged in a deliberate deception. The public was led to believe that Hunter was selling his artwork to anonymous buyers, but in reality, he was profiting from his father’s position by selling mediocre art to access seekers.
These claims are supported by an Insider report from July, which identified Morris and Hirsh Naftali as buyers of Hunter’s work. The report stated that Hunter was aware of their identities when they made their purchases. Hirsh Naftali, a Los Angeles-based real estate investor, is known for her influence in California Democratic circles and her significant donations to the party.
According to the House Oversight Committee, Bergès testified that he tried but failed to persuade Hirsh Naftali to purchase Hunter’s artwork in 2020. However, shortly after Joe Biden became president, she bought her first piece for $42,000. In July 2022, Joe appointed Hirsh Naftali to serve on the Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad, the same commission that Biden family associate Eric Schwerin was appointed to during the Obama-Biden Administration.
As for Morris, the gallerist claimed that he purchased the majority of Hunter’s paintings for a staggering $875,000 in January 2023. This confidant and financial backer of Hunter allegedly paid Bergès a 40% commission on the purchase, with Hunter and Morris working out the financial implications.
These revelations shed light on a highly questionable art deal that raises concerns about the integrity of the Biden family and their connections to wealthy buyers. The art world may never be the same again.
About the Author
Shawn Fleetwood is a staff writer for The Federalist and a graduate of the University of Mary Washington. His work has been featured in various outlets, including RealClearPolitics, RealClearHealth, and Conservative Review. Follow him on Twitter @ShawnFleetwood.
What steps will the House Oversight Committee take to investigate the claims of potential misuse of political connections and lack of transparency in the handling of Hunter Biden’s art sales
The White House may have misled the public about the transparency of the art sales. The anonymity of buyers was supposed to ensure that there would be no potential for corruption or influence, yet it appears that Hunter Biden was aware of who purchased his artwork.
This raises questions about whether there was any preferential treatment or special access given to these buyers because of their political connections. It is concerning that prominent Democrat donors were among the purchasers of Hunter’s paintings, as it suggests a potential avenue for influence or political favoritism.
The art world has long been associated with money laundering and other illicit activities, and this situation only adds to the skepticism surrounding the sale of Hunter’s paintings. Without transparency and accountability, it is difficult to trust that these sales were purely for artistic merit and not influenced by political connections.
One must also consider the potential conflict of interest for President Joe Biden. If he knew of and attended an event at the White House where his son’s artwork was being sold, it raises concerns about the ethical implications of such involvement. The involvement of the President in his son’s art sales creates a blurred line between personal and political interests.
The issue here is not simply about Hunter Biden’s art, but rather the potential misuse of political connections and the lack of transparency in the White House’s handling of the situation. It is essential for government officials to act with integrity and ensure that they are not using their positions for personal gain or benefiting their family members.
The House Oversight Committee should thoroughly investigate these claims and hold those responsible accountable if any wrongdoing is discovered. It is crucial for the public’s trust in the government to be maintained, and that requires transparency and adherence to ethical standards.
The art world should also be cautious about being drawn into political controversies and potentially becoming a vehicle for corruption. The integrity of the art market relies on buyers and sellers alike abiding by ethical standards and avoiding any perception of impropriety.
In conclusion, the recent revelations about Hunter Biden’s paintings and the connections to the White House raise serious concerns about transparency and the potential misuse of political power. It is imperative that these allegations be thoroughly investigated to ensure accountability and maintain the public’s trust in the government. The art world, too, must remain vigilant in upholding ethical standards and avoiding involvement in political controversies.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
