Rand Paul cautions about a little-known 1940s law granting the President an ‘Internet Kill Switch’.
Rand Paul Warns of Obscure 1940’s Law That Gives the President an ‘Internet Kill Switch’
During a recent interview with Dr. Scott Atlas, Kentucky Republican Rand Paul issued a stark warning about a federal law that seemingly grants the U.S. president the power to shut down the Internet using a “kill switch” rule. Paul, speaking on the doctor’s engaging “Independent Truths” podcast, highlighted the concerning emergency powers that the government possesses, including a hidden “kill switch” that can be used to turn off the internet.
Sen. Rand Paul on Limiting the U.S. Government’s Emergency Powers, Including the ‘Internet Kill Switch’
“Some emergencies have been going on 50 years. They’re still on the books. There’s actually an emergency power that was given to the FCC in the 1930’s that gives the… pic.twitter.com/udkBCve4NU
— Chief Nerd (@TheChiefNerd) October 14, 2023
Paul went on to explain how this power was exploited during the COVID-19 pandemic, with the CDC using an outdated law to justify actions such as suspending mortgage payments. He expressed disbelief at the abuse of power and emphasized that no one could have foreseen such extreme measures being taken.
Furthermore, Paul revealed that there are numerous other emergency powers that have been in effect for decades, including one that grants the president the authority to control and shut down all communications in the United States. This power, often referred to as the “internet kill switch,” has never been utilized but poses a significant threat to individual freedoms.
Paul firmly believes that no president, regardless of political affiliation, should possess this level of control. He is actively working with fellow politicians, such as Tulsi Gabbard, to eliminate this dangerous provision.
Efforts are also underway in Congress to address this issue. The Preventing Unwarranted Communications Shutdowns Act, proposed by Democratic Rep. Anna Eshoo and GOP Rep. Morgan Griffith, aims to impose stricter limitations on the president’s power to shut down communications during emergencies.
Paul’s concerns about the potential consequences of granting a president the ability to completely silence communication channels are valid. The damage caused by such an action, particularly during a crisis, would be catastrophic for the nation.
A Note from Our Founder:
Silicon Valley and the Big Tech tyrants have done everything they can to put The Western Journal out of business. Our faithful subscribers have kept us going.
If you’ve never chosen to subscribe, let me be honest: We need your help today.
I also want to send you an autographed copy of “Counterpunch,” which will give you a plan to fight back for our beloved country.
Subscribe right now – The Western Journal stands for truth in this difficult time.
Please stand with us by subscribing today.
Floyd G. Brown
Founder of The Western Journal
The post Rand Paul Warns of Obscure 1940’s Law That Gives the President an ‘Internet Kill Switch’ appeared first on The Western Journal.
What measures should be in place to ensure that the use of emergency powers, including the “internet kill switch,” is limited to genuine emergencies and subject to appropriate oversight
Rat ic Representative Anna Eshoo and Republican Representative Morgan Griffith, aims to limit the president’s power to shut down the internet in non-emergency situations. The bill would repeal the provision that grants the president such authority and establish guidelines for the use of emergency powers.
The concerns raised by Rand Paul and others about the “internet kill switch” are valid and highlight the need for greater transparency and accountability when it comes to the government’s emergency powers. While it is important to have measures in place to address emergencies and protect national security, it is equally important to ensure that these powers are not abused or used to suppress individual rights and freedoms.
In the age of digital connectivity, the internet has become a crucial tool for communication, information sharing, and economic activity. Shutting down the internet can have far-reaching consequences, impacting not only individuals’ ability to access information and connect with others but also disrupting businesses, education, and healthcare services.
The use of emergency powers, including the “internet kill switch,” should be clearly defined and limited to genuine emergencies where there is a clear and immediate threat to national security. Any decision to shut down the internet should be subject to judicial oversight and should involve consultation with relevant stakeholders, including industry experts and civil society organizations.
The introduction of the Preventing Unwarranted Communications Shutdowns Act is a step in the right direction. It recognizes the need to strike a balance between national security and individual freedoms, ensuring that emergency powers are not misused or prolonged beyond what is necessary.
It is crucial for lawmakers to prioritize the protection of individual rights and the preservation of democratic principles when discussing and enacting laws related to emergency powers. The public must also remain vigilant and hold their elected representatives accountable for any misuse or abuse of these powers.
As technology continues to advance and society becomes increasingly reliant on digital platforms, it is essential that laws and regulations keep pace with these developments. Safeguarding the internet as a free and open space for communication and innovation should be a priority for all. The concerns raised by Rand Paul serve as a reminder of the importance of protecting individual freedoms in the digital age and preventing the misuse of government powers.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...