The daily wire

Prince Harry’s case against a U.K. publisher dismissed, judge criticizes phone-hacking allegation.

Prince Harry’s Phone-Hacking Case Against UK Publisher‌ Thrown Out

Prince⁤ Harry’s​ case against the U.K. publisher ‍for ‍The Sun was​ thrown out on Thursday ‌by a ⁣judge who slammed the⁢ royal’s phone-hacking⁢ claim as implausible, with ⁢the outlet’s publisher calling it a ⁣”significant victory.”

Justice⁢ Timothy Fancourt’s ⁤ruling found that‌ the ⁤Duke of Sussex’s claim had “not ‍reached the necessary threshold‌ of plausibility and cogency,” ⁢the Daily ​Mail reported.

The judge dismissed the member of the royal ⁤family’s claim that ​there was ⁤a ⁢”secret⁢ agreement” between the press and‌ Buckingham Palace, calling the alleged ⁣arrangement implausible.

Despite the case being ⁤thrown out, the judge did leave open the door ⁣for‍ the⁣ prince to sue the⁤ publisher for other alleged illegal ⁣activities that helped it gain information about the ​duke ⁢and members​ of ‌the royal family, Page Six‌ noted.

A trial is set to take place next ‍January to⁢ deal with these matters, unless some kind of settlement is‌ reached before‍ that.

In 2019, the royal filed a lawsuit​ against the now-defunct⁤ News of the World, The Sun, and The Daily Mirror, claiming his phone and those ⁣of⁢ his friends had ‌been hacked,‌ allowing the ​former outlet access⁣ to his voicemails between ⁢1996 and​ 2011.

The U.K. publisher ​News Group Newspapers argued that Harry was‌ too late because, by law, claimants have ‍six years to ⁣start legal action once they learn of alleged ​illegal activity. The judge agreed ⁣with the publisher​ and said the duke was aware ​of the possible hacking by September 2013.

CLICK HERE TO⁣ GET THE DAILY WIRE APP

“Time therefore expired,” Fancourt said.

The prince ⁣tried to explain that his delay in filing the suit ‍was because there was ⁤an alleged “secret⁢ agreement” between senior courtiers⁤ at Buckingham​ Palace and ⁤newspaper executives.

However,‍ Fancourt agreed with The Sun’s KC Anthony Hudson, who told the court earlier that this was “Alice in Wonderland⁣ stuff” and that ‌there was never any such “secret agreement.” Fancourt said there was no witness or documentary evidence to support what the Duke claimed.

After ⁢the ruling, News⁣ Group Newspapers (NGN) called the The‍ High ‌Court’s decision “a significant victory.”

“The Judge, Mr. Justice Fancourt,‍ found his ‌claims in relation to the alleged ‘secret agreement’⁣ were not plausible or credible,” the statement read. “It ‌is quite clear there was never any such agreement and it is only the ‌Duke who has ⁢ever asserted there was.”



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker