UW Chancellor Engages in Porn Production, Observes Academia’s Vulgar Performance Trend
It seems like they should have seen it coming.
Back in 2018, University of Wisconsin-La Crosse Chancellor Joe Gow invited porn star Nina Hartley to speak on campus during “Free Speech Week.” As a result, he lost his raise and faced criticism from the University of Wisconsin System president for his “poor judgment.”
Recently, it has come to light that Gow was involved in making and distributing pornographic videos with his wife Carmen Wilson and other individuals, including Nina Hartley and a pornographer named Will Pounder.
Gow, who is 63 years old, is no longer the chancellor of UW-La Crosse. He was unanimously fired by the University of Wisconsin System Board of Regents, with System President Jay Rothman stating that Gow’s actions had caused significant damage to the university’s reputation.
Gow, however, argues that he has a First Amendment right to pursue his “passion” in his spare time and claims that the regents violated his due-process rights.
Experts on the First Amendment disagree with Gow’s argument. Critics of the UW System’s “diversity, equity, and inclusion” (DEI) agenda believe that the university system is facing the consequences of promoting depravity.
‘A Scandal Would Ensue’
Gow does not deny his involvement in sexual activities. In fact, he and his wife have published books detailing their personal experiences in the porn industry. However, their identities are not hidden, as their photos appear in the books and on social media. They acknowledge that their actions would cause a scandal if their peers were to find out.
Indeed.
According to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel report, Gow and Wilson have produced six videos on the website OnlyFans featuring other porn stars. These videos can also be found on other porn websites such as PornHub and XHamster. Additionally, they have a YouTube channel where they cook vegan dishes while engaging in sexual acts.
When reached for comment, Gow stated that his attorney has advised him and his wife to refrain from speaking to the media while they consider their next steps. He is currently exploring his legal options.
Before his silence, Gow argued that his pornographic activities are protected under the First Amendment as they do not mention the University of Wisconsin or his position as chancellor. However, many find his actions problematic.
‘Detrimental to His Public Role’
Legal experts believe that Gow does not have a strong case. First Amendment protections for government employees require a careful analysis of whether the speech is related to their job and whether it is a matter of public interest. In Gow’s case, his public sexual activities do not raise public concerns.
Ken White, a First Amendment attorney, points to a Supreme Court case where a police officer was fired for selling pornographic videos of himself. The court ruled that his actions were not protected under the First Amendment. White believes that even if Gow’s videos were considered speech on a matter of public concern, the university would still have the right to fire him due to the detrimental effect it has on his public role.
Gow’s actions clearly violate the terms of his contract with the university, which discourages engaging in activities that are adverse to the interests of the University of Wisconsin System. The Board of Regents President expressed outrage and disgust at Gow’s behavior.
‘New Religion on the Left’
Some conservative lawmakers argue that Gow’s involvement in pornography is a result of the university system’s far-left DEI agenda, which has embraced various forms of depravity. The University of Wisconsin-Madison, for example, hosted an art exhibit titled “Free Porn on ‘Your Tube'” that depicted a pregnant woman being sodomized by an oil pipeline.
Furthermore, a gender and women’s studies professor at UW-Madison gained internet fame for twerking semi-nude while wearing an N-95 mask on stage at a rap concert. This professor also expressed support for Black Lives Matter rioters and discouraged recording illegal activities during the riots.
Critics argue that DEI has become a new religion for the left, and taxpayer dollars are being used to promote it on college campuses. However, the recent firing of Gow suggests that even within this new religion, there are limits.
President Rothman, in response to Gow’s claims of free speech, emphasized the importance of good judgment and being a role model for the university community. Interestingly, Rothman had previously praised Gow’s leadership and stewardship.
As for Gow’s pension and benefits, it remains uncertain whether taxpayers will be responsible for them. First Amendment attorney Ken White believes that Gow may have a stronger argument for holding a teaching position, as professors are expected to engage in unconventional activities.
rnrn
What was the impact of ex-Chancellor Joe Gow’s involvement in the porn industry on the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse’s reputation?
Formal Article: Ex-Chancellor Joe Gow and the First Amendment Debate Surrounding His Involvement in the Porn Industry
It seems like they should have seen it coming. Back in 2018, University of Wisconsin-La Crosse Chancellor Joe Gow invited porn star Nina Hartley to speak on campus during “Free Speech Week.” As a result, he lost his raise and faced criticism from the University of Wisconsin System president for his “poor judgment.” Recently, it has come to light that Gow was involved in making and distributing pornographic videos with his wife Carmen Wilson and other individuals, including Nina Hartley and a pornographer named Will Pounder.
Gow, who is 63 years old, is no longer the chancellor of UW-La Crosse. He was unanimously fired by the University of Wisconsin System Board of Regents, with System President Jay Rothman stating that Gow’s actions had caused significant damage to the university’s reputation. Gow, however, argues that he has a First Amendment right to pursue his “passion” in his spare time and claims that the regents violated his due-process rights.
Experts on the First Amendment disagree with Gow’s argument. Critics of the UW System’s “diversity, equity, and inclusion” (DEI) agenda believe that the university system is facing the consequences of promoting depravity.
Gow does not deny his involvement in sexual activities. In fact, he and his wife have published books detailing their personal experiences in the porn industry. However, their identities are not hidden, as their photos appear in the books and on social media. They acknowledge that their actions would cause a scandal if their peers were to find out.
According to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel report, Gow and Wilson have produced six videos on the website OnlyFans featuring other porn stars. These videos can also be found on other porn websites such as PornHub and XHamster. Additionally, they have a YouTube channel where they cook vegan dishes while engaging in sexual acts.
When reached for comment, Gow stated that his attorney has advised him and his wife to refrain from speaking to the media while they consider their next steps. He is currently exploring his legal options. Before his silence, Gow argued that his pornographic activities are protected under the First Amendment as they do not mention the University of Wisconsin or his position as chancellor. However, many find his actions problematic.
Legal experts believe that Gow does not have a strong case. First Amendment protections for government employees require a careful analysis of whether the speech is related to their job and whether it is a matter of public interest. In Gow’s case, his public sexual activities do not raise public concerns.
Ken White, a First Amendment attorney, points to a Supreme Court case where a police officer was fired for selling pornographic videos of himself. The court ruled that his actions were not protected under the First Amendment. White believes that even if Gow’s videos were considered speech on a matter of public concern, the university would have the right to take action, given the detrimental effect on his public role.
The controversy surrounding ex-Chancellor Joe Gow and his involvement in the porn industry raises important questions about the limits of free speech and the professional responsibilities of public figures. While everyone is entitled to their private pursuits, the impact on their public position cannot be overlooked. In this case, the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse determined that Gow’s actions were incompatible with his role as chancellor and took appropriate action. The legal implications of this debate will undoubtedly continue to be discussed in the context of First Amendment rights and public accountability.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
