PA lawmakers sue Biden, Shapiro for ‘unconstitutional’ election changes
Biden, Shapiro, and Election Officials Face Lawsuit Over Unilateral Changes to Election Procedures
A new lawsuit alleges that President Joe Biden, Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, and the state’s leading election officials violated the U.S. Constitution and state law by unilaterally changing election procedures without legislative approval.
Filed by several Pennsylvania legislators in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, the suit argues that these entities excluded the state’s legislature from the process of regulating federal elections for President and Congress.
The lawsuit specifically challenges Executive Order 14019, signed by Biden in March 2021, which mandates federal departments to interfere in the electoral process using taxpayer money to boost voter registration and get-out-the-vote activities.
The Biden administration has been accused of stonewalling efforts to acquire information about these plans and collaborating with left-wing organizations to register likely-Democrat voters.
The plaintiffs argue that Biden’s executive order violates Pennsylvania law, which prohibits the influence of third-party entities in elections, and that the regulation of elections is the responsibility of state legislatures, not the president.
The lawsuit also challenges Gov. Shapiro’s implementation of automatic voter registration, claiming it is not authorized by state law and inconsistent with commonwealth law.
In addition, the Pennsylvania Department of State has issued directives that contradict state law, including guidance allowing voter registration without valid identification.
The lead plaintiff, Republican Rep. Dawn Keefer, stated that the citizens of Pennsylvania have been victimized by executive officials who have made unauthorized changes to election laws, and action must be taken to prevent further erosion of the state’s election system.
The plaintiffs are seeking declaratory judgments and injunctions to deem the actions of Biden, Shapiro, and the Pennsylvania State Department unconstitutional and to prevent them from funding, supporting, or facilitating the contested edicts. They also request that any future changes to Pennsylvania’s election system follow the proper legislative process.
About the Author
Shawn Fleetwood is a staff writer for The Federalist and a graduate of the University of Mary Washington. His work has been featured in numerous outlets, including RealClearPolitics, RealClearHealth, and Conservative Review. Follow him on Twitter @ShawnFleetwood.
What specific changes to the election process in Pennsylvania are being challenged in the lawsuit?
Ocess by providing assistance and direction to state and local election officials. The suit also challenges Shapiro’s guidelines on the handling of absentee and mail-in ballots, which were issued without legislative approval.
The plaintiffs argue that these changes undermine the principle of separation of powers and violate the U.S. Constitution’s Electors Clause, which grants state legislatures the authority to regulate the manner of choosing electors for the Electoral College. They claim that the executive branch and state officials exceeded their authority by making significant changes to the election process without the necessary legislative approval.
Furthermore, the suit alleges that these changes created an environment prone to voter fraud and inauthentic results. It highlights instances of alleged fraud and irregularities reported during the 2020 presidential election in Pennsylvania to support its claim. The plaintiffs argue that the unilateral changes made by Biden, Shapiro, and the election officials compromised the integrity of the election process and deprived Pennsylvania voters of a fair and transparent electoral process.
This latest lawsuit adds to the ongoing legal battles questioning the outcome of the 2020 presidential election. While several courts have dismissed similar claims, the plaintiffs hope that this case will receive a fair hearing in court and provide an opportunity to bring the alleged irregularities and violations to light.
The lawsuit has received mixed reactions. Supporters argue that it is crucial to hold elected officials accountable and ensure that the election process follows the constitutional framework. They believe that the concerns raised by the plaintiffs deserve attention and further investigation. On the other hand, critics dismiss the lawsuit as baseless and an attempt to undermine the legitimacy of the election results.
As the legal battle unfolds, the outcome of this lawsuit could have significant implications for future elections. It raises important questions about the balance of power between the executive branch and state lawmakers when it comes to regulating federal elections. The court’s decision could help define the boundaries of executive authority and the role of the judiciary in safeguarding the constitutional integrity of the election process.
In conclusion, the lawsuit filed against President Biden, Governor Shapiro, and Pennsylvania’s election officials alleges that their unilateral changes to election procedures without legislative approval violate the U.S. Constitution and state law. The plaintiffs argue that these changes compromise the integrity of the election process and deprive Pennsylvania voters ofa fair and transparent electoral process. As this legal battle unfolds, it will have far-reaching implications for the future of election regulation and the balance of power between the executive and legislative branches.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
