Penn University loses $100M donation amid claims of weaponized antisemitism by ‘Squad’ Rep
The University of Pennsylvania Loses $100 Million Donation Over Controversial Testimony
The University of Pennsylvania has suffered a major setback as it lost a $100 million donation due to the controversial testimony given by its president, Liz Magill. The shocking news was revealed in a letter from Ross Stevens, former CEO of Stone Ridge Asset Management, which was obtained by Axios.
“Its permissive approach to hate speech calling for violence against Jews and laissez faire attitude toward harassment and discrimination against Jewish students would violate any policies of rules that prohibit harassment and discrimination based on religion, including those of Stone Ridge,” Stevens’s lawyers wrote in the letter. “President Magill’s December 6, 2023 post on X admitted as much, when she belatedly acknowledged—only after her Congressional testimony went viral and demands for her termination amplified—that calls for genocide of the Jewish people constitute harassment and discrimination.
Stevens’s lawyers further expressed concerns about the university’s handling of antisemitism, highlighting broader issues beyond Magill’s testimony. They emphasized that Stone Ridge, as an organization, cannot support an institution that fails to address such serious matters.
“In light of the foregoing, Stone Ridge has reason to believe that the University’s actions (or lack thereof) constitute ‘Limited Partner Cause’ under Section 10.12 of the LP Agreement, which gives Stone Ridge the ability, in its sole discretion, to retire the University’s Units,” the letter continued.
The letter concluded by stating that Stone Ridge is open to meeting with the university to discuss the situation and provide an opportunity for the school to rectify its mistakes.
In response to the controversy, UPenn’s board of trustees held an emergency meeting, prompted by Governor Josh Shapiro’s urging. Additionally, the House announced an investigation into the school.
Rep. Rashida Tlaib Denounces the Weaponization of Antisemitism
Meanwhile, Representative Rashida Tlaib spoke out against the weaponization of antisemitism, particularly on college campuses.
“From college students to those in the workplace, I’m getting the calls of people being pushed to silence — being bullied, some people weaponizing antisemitism in a way to silence voices, all of that needs to stop,” Tlaib said. “Americans have a right to speak up. Americans have a right to the institutions they work at or the people that represent them to say, ’Look, this is my opinion, I believe you should support X, Y, and Z.’ Again, we have to be able to make sure that as we look at all these forms of hate, that it is not being weaponized in a way to silence voices like myself and… many of the voices that are here.”
Tlaib’s powerful statement highlights the importance of addressing and combating all forms of hate, ensuring that they are not used as tools to suppress freedom of speech and expression.
In what ways can the University of Pennsylvania rebuild trust with the Jewish community and demonstrate its commitment to inclusivity and the eradication of discrimination
Regarding its permissive environment for hate speech and discrimination. The letter also emphasized the inadequacy of President Magill’s response to the issue, which only came after significant public pressure.
The $100 million donation was intended to support several initiatives at the University of Pennsylvania, including scholarships, research programs, and facility improvements. This loss will undoubtedly have a significant impact on the university’s ability to pursue these endeavors and maintain its position as a leading institution of higher education.
Antisemitism is a serious issue that should never be tolerated in any academic or social environment. Institutions of higher learning have an important responsibility to foster inclusivity, diversity, and respect for all individuals, regardless of their religious beliefs. The University of Pennsylvania’s failure to effectively address the issue of antisemitism within its community has not only resulted in the loss of a substantial donation but has also tarnished its reputation.
It is crucial for universities to create a safe and welcoming environment for all students, staff, and faculty members. This includes taking decisive action against hate speech, discrimination, and harassment. By allowing hate speech to persist unchecked, the University of Pennsylvania has failed in its duty to protect its Jewish students and uphold the values of tolerance and respect.
The loss of a $100 million donation should serve as a wake-up call for the University of Pennsylvania and other institutions of higher education. It is imperative that they prioritize the eradication of all forms of discrimination on their campuses and implement policies and programs that promote inclusivity and respect.
In response to this incident, the University of Pennsylvania must take immediate and meaningful steps to address the concerns raised by Ross Stevens and his lawyers. This entails implementing more robust policies and procedures to combat antisemitism, providing resources for education and awareness on the issue, and reinforcing a zero-tolerance approach to hate speech and discrimination.
Additionally, the university should reach out to the Jewish community within its campus and beyond to rebuild trust and ensure that their concerns are heard and addressed. Open dialogue, active listening, and transparent action are necessary to rectify the damage caused by this controversy and prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future.
Ultimately, the loss of a significant donation due to allegations of tolerance for hate speech and discrimination should serve as a catalyst for change within the University of Pennsylvania. It is an opportunity for the institution to reevaluate its commitment to inclusivity, diversity, and the well-being of all its community members. Only through sincere and sustainable efforts can the university rebuild its reputation and demonstrate its dedication to upholding the values of respect, acceptance, and equality.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."