Paul Backed Obama Droning Two Americans, Not Cartel Strike
The article discusses Senator Rand Paul’s criticism of a recent Trump administration drone strike targeting a Venezuelan boat allegedly carrying narcotics. While Vice President J.D. Vance praised the operation as an effective military action, Paul controversially compared it to a lynching, condemning the killing without trial.Paul expressed concern over the military’s use in executing suspects accused of crimes without due process,referencing themes from *To Kill a Mockingbird*. The strike was part of the trump administration’s broader effort to combat drug cartels, which are responsible for countless deaths in the U.S. through narcotics trafficking.
Interestingly, Paul had previously defended a drone strike ordered by former President Obama, which mistakenly killed two American hostages, arguing the president was trying to do the right thing in a war zone. This discrepancy has drawn attention, with some viewing Vance’s stance as aligned with Trump’s doctrine of overwhelming force to protect American interests. The Trump-ordered strike reportedly killed 11 members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua, classified as a terrorist association, and followed an increase in U.S.naval presence in the Caribbean.
Paul’s office later clarified that he opposes drone strikes on civilians, especially Americans, without congressional authorization or due process, and criticized the recent strike as lacking proper identification and violating standard rules of engagement.The article highlights tensions between different political approaches to military force, due process, and U.S. national security policy regarding drug cartels and foreign threats near American borders.
The Trump administration used a drone strike to eliminate what it says was a Venezuelan boat filled with narcotics last week. When Vice President J.D. Vance applauded the operation as the “highest and best use of our military,” Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., compared the strike to a lynching.
After a left-wing social media reply guy calling the strike a “war crime,” Vance replied back, “I don’t give a sh-t what you call it,” which triggered Paul’s bizarre comparison to lynch mobs in the Jim Crow South.
“JD ‘I don’t give a sh-t’ Vance says killing people he accuses of a crime is the ‘highest and best use of the military,’” Paul said. “Did he ever read To Kill a Mockingbird? Did he ever wonder what might happen if the accused were immediately executed without trial or representation?? What a despicable and thoughtless sentiment it is to glorify killing someone without a trial.”
Narcotics pouring across the southern border kill tens of thousands of Americans each year and enrich international terrorist cartels. President Trump has been treating cartel proliferation of such activity within the American homeland as a war, albeit yet another war undeclared by Congress. The strike is one of the very few recent examples of the U.S. military directly protecting Americans at home.
Yet in 2015, when former President Barack Obama approved a drone strike in the Afghanistan-Pakistan border region that reportedly accidentally killed two American hostages in addition to foreign combatants during another congressionally unauthorized war, Paul defended Obama.
“The world is so partisan, I tend not to want to blame the President for the loss of life here. I think he was trying to do the right thing,” he said on Fox and Friends at the time. “These people were in a war zone and probably got what was coming to them – the captors. Unfortunately some innocent people also died.”
Paul’s position on Obama’s drone strike drew praise from prominent warmonger Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.
A source close to Vance said it was strange Paul was willing to defend Obama when he droned Americans in the Middle East, but wouldn’t defend a strike against foreign terrorists close to America’s shores: “The vice president believes in the Trump doctrine and using overwhelming force to protect core American interests and save American lives.”
Trump said the Sept. 2 strike “resulted in 11 terrorists killed in action. No U.S. Forces were harmed in this strike,” and the boat had “a lot of drugs.” According to Trump, the U.S. military identified the boat’s crew as members of Tren de Aragua, a Venezuelan gang the U.S. government designated a terrorist organization earlier this year.
The strike took place after Trump increased the number of U.S. warships in the Caribbean to quell threats from Latin American cartels.
Paul’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Update: Paul’s office sent the following statement from Paul shortly after this article published: “During my time in the Senate, I have been the foremost critic of drones being used on civilians, especially Americans. In 2013, I spoke for nearly 13 hours filibustering Obama’s use of drones on American citizens overseas.
“I have not, however, opposed the concept of using drones in war. That position remains unaltered today. The recent drone attack on a small speedboat over 2,000 miles from our shore without identification of the occupants or the content of the boat is in no way part of a declared war and defies our longstanding Coast Guard rules of engagement which include: warnings to halt, non-lethal force to capture, and ultimately lethal force in self-defense or in cases of resistance.”
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
