Panelists debate costs of energy legislation as Illinoisans struggle
The article reports on a recent Illinois Senate Energy and Public Utilities committee hearing discussing Senate Bill 40,which addresses battery energy storage legislation. The debate centers around whether the bill would help reduce energy price spikes or lead to additional costs for consumers. Consumer advocates express concern about high utility bills causing financial hardship, forcing families to make arduous choices between essential expenses like rent, food, and cooling. Supporters argue that the bill could accelerate the deployment of large-scale battery storage, which is important to avoid further cost increases due to delayed action. Opponents highlight examples from other states where energy costs soared following similar battery storage policies and criticize the bill for lacking cost caps that protect consumers from rising utility bills.The committee chair indicated that further hearings on energy issues are planned to continue the discussion.
Panelists debate costs of energy legislation as Illinoisans struggle to pay bills
(The Center Square) – Some consumer advocates say battery storage legislation would help reduce energy price spikes, but others say an Illinois Senate bill’s provisions would lead to net costs for customers.
The Illinois Senate Energy and Public Utilities Committee discussed energy storage provisions of House amendment to Senate Bill 40 in a virtual subject matter hearing on Thursday.
The committee chair, state Sen. Steve Stadelman, D-Rockford, said lawmakers might consider legislation during the fall veto session in an attempt to ensure energy affordability and reliability for consumers.
United Congregations of Metro-East Executive Director Darnell Tingle told the committee that high utility costs are forcing families to make brutal choices.
“Do I pay Ameren or do I pay the rent? Do I keep the [air conditioning] running in this dangerous heat, or do I put food on the table? This is a crisis of health and safety,” Tingle said, adding that Illinois “can and should do better.”
Citizens Utility Board executive director Sarah Moskowitz said SB 40 could help get large-scale battery storage online quickly.
“This speed-to-market attribute is really important as we are already experiencing the costs of inaction,” Moskowitz said
Citing Energy Information Administration data, Illinois Industrial Energy Consumers Chairman Phillip Golden said California and New York implemented centralized battery procurement policies.
“You will see their energy costs are, respectively, 60% and 100% higher than what Illinois paid in just June,” Golden said.
Golden said such battery developments resulted in net payments from consumers to battery storage developers.
State Sen. Terri Bryant, R-Murphysboro, said SB 40 would not provide immediate relief and could only guarantee a cost increase.
State Sen. Sue Rezin, R-Morris, asked why the bill did not include cost caps for battery storage.
“In the past we’ve put cost caps in just to make sure utility bills don’t go up. In the bills that we have passed where there wasn’t a cost cap, the bills have gone through the roof and now we’re hearing from customers,” Rezin explained.
Stadelman said a second subject matter hearing on energy issues would likely be held in early October.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
