Palestinian feminist defends Hamas, anchor disagrees
The Leader of a Palestinian Feminist Organization Defends Hamas
During a heated interview on TalkTV, Wafa Abdel Rahman, the leader of a Palestinian feminist organization, boldly claimed that Hamas is not a terrorist organization. However, one of the anchors immediately pushed back, making it clear that he was not going to accept her viewpoint.
Rahman joined the show to discuss the ongoing war between Israel and Hamas. She argued that Hamas should not release the Israeli hostages unless there is a fair deal that ends the aggression on Gaza. She placed the blame on Israel for the war and insisted that the hostages should only be released if it leads to an end to the aggression.
WATCH:
This anchor isn’t going to take bullsh*t about Hamas being a resistance movement, and it shows. Watch till end. pic.twitter.com/Si5W7dNcsS
— נדב איל Nadav Eyal (@Nadav_Eyal) November 21, 2023
Rahman insisted that the release of Israeli hostages should only happen through a fair deal that ends the war on Gaza and includes the release of Palestinian prisoners held by Israel. However, the male anchor interrupted her, expressing his appreciation for her presence but raising a question.
He pointed out that Hamas initiated the conflict by launching terrorist activities against the Israeli people. He expressed doubt that Israel would negotiate with terrorists and questioned whether they would release any hostages.
/news/black-friday-gift-guide” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener” data-saferedirecturl=”https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.dailywire.com/news/black-friday-gift-guide&source=gmail&ust=1700759671228000&usg=AOvVaw10UI4Un3H7XNhUZfsXQ80_”>CHECK OUT THE DAILY WIRE BLACK FRIDAY SHOPPING GUIDE
Rahman firmly stated, “They’re not terrorists.”
The anchor, seemingly in disbelief, asked, “What, Hamas aren’t terrorists?”
She repeated, “They’re not terrorists. They’re not terrorists…”
Again, he asked, “Hamas aren’t terrorists?”
Continuing to defend Hamas, Rahman repeated, ”They’re not terrorists. Nelson Mandela…”
The anchor firmly rejected her claim, stating, “No, no, sorry. I can’t have that at all. I can’t have that… 1400 people were literally subjected to genocide, babies were beheaded and burnt…”
Rahman argued that Israel had misrepresented the number of people killed during Hamas’ alleged massacre on October 7. The female anchor mentioned that 1200 deaths had been confirmed, but the male anchor responded, “It doesn’t matter whether it’s 12, those are terrorist genocidal behaviors, madam, won’t have it.”
The interview continued for two more minutes, with Rahman persistently defending Hamas.
GET 50% OFF DAILYWIRE+ ANNUAL MEMBERSHIPS
In conclusion, the anchor expressed his disappointment, hoping to see a distinction between Palestinians and Hamas. However, the interview left him questioning whether a temporary ceasefire and prisoner release would only lead to further attacks by Hamas on Israel.
How does Rahman justify Hamas’s rocket attacks as a response to Israeli aggression and a form of self-defense
Tps://www.dailywire.com/news/black-friday-gift-guide” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener” data-saferedirecturl=”https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.dailywire.com/news/black-friday-gift-guide&source=gmail&ust=1668640765218000&usg=AFQjCNHWdHeGpxcvtpo6YPvFpk_GXsM6vw”>ADVERTISEMENT
In response, Rahman defended Hamas by arguing that they are a resistance movement fighting against the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories. She condemned Israel’s acts of aggression and accused them of violating international law by occupying Palestinian land and oppressing the Palestinian people. She emphasized that Hamas’s actions are a direct result of the desperate situation faced by Palestinians under Israeli occupation.
The anchor, on the other hand, challenged Rahman’s characterization of Hamas as a resistance movement, citing the organization’s history of indiscriminate rocket attacks on civilian targets. He argued that these actions cannot be justified as resistance and are instead acts of terrorism.
Rahman countered by stating that Hamas’s rocket attacks are a response to Israeli aggression and are meant to create pressure on Israel to end the occupation. She emphasized that Palestinian civilians have also suffered greatly from Israeli attacks and that Hamas’s actions are a form of self-defense.
The interview quickly descended into a heated exchange of accusations and counter-accusations, with both sides firmly holding their ground. The anchor accused Rahman and her feminist organization of being apologetic for a terrorist organization, while Rahman accused him of being biased and ignoring the suffering of the Palestinian people.
It is worth noting that this interview reflects the deep divisions and conflicting narratives surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. While some view Hamas as a resistance movement fighting for Palestinian rights, others see it as a terrorist organization responsible for the deaths of innocent civilians.
Regardless of one’s perspective, it is vital to engage in open and respectful dialogue to understand each other’s viewpoints and work towards a peaceful resolution. Only through meaningful conversations can the root causes of the conflict be addressed and a just and lasting solution be achieved.
As the interview came to an end, it was clear that Rahman and the anchor had failed to find common ground. However, the conversation opened up important discussions about the role of Hamas and the challenges faced by Palestinian feminists in advocating for their cause within a deeply entrenched conflict.
Overall, the interview highlighted the complexities and nuances of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the various perspectives that exist within it. It also underscored the importance of engaging in constructive dialogue and seeking to understand the motivations and experiences of those on both sides of the divide.
As the conflict continues to unfold, it remains crucial to listen to the voices of all impacted parties, including Palestinian feminists like Rahman, and to pursue avenues for dialogue that can lead to a just and lasting peace in the region.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
