Oregon Supreme Court requests additional briefs as battle over Trump’s ballot access progresses
Trump Fights Legal Battle to Stay on Oregon Ballot
Former President Donald Trump is facing a legal challenge in Oregon as he fights to secure a spot on the state’s 2024 presidential ballot. This comes after being barred from two other states recently.
Attorneys from Free Speech For People have filed a lawsuit with the Oregon Supreme Court, aiming to prevent Trump from appearing on the ballot. They argue that Trump’s involvement in the Capitol riot qualifies as “engaging in insurrection,” which would disqualify him from holding office under the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.
Last week, Trump’s legal team submitted a 162-page brief to the Oregon Supreme Court, countering the opposition’s claims. They argue that Trump did not violate Section 3 of the 14th Amendment and that the events of January 6th cannot be classified as an insurrection.
Oregon Secretary of State LaVonne Griffin-Valade, a Democrat, previously stated that she lacks the authority to block Trump from the Republican Party primary ballot. She explained that Oregon law does not grant her the power to determine the qualifications of candidates in a presidential primary.
“I will follow our usual process and expect to put Donald Trump on the primary ballot unless a court directs me otherwise,” Griffin-Valade said.
The Oregon Supreme Court has requested both parties to submit additional briefs by January 9th to address the issue of standing and the secretary of state’s authority in this matter. A decision is expected after these briefs are filed.
Trump is also appealing his removal from the primary ballot in two other states. Last week, Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows, a Democrat, disqualified Trump following a ruling by the Colorado Supreme Court. The U.S. Supreme Court has yet to address Trump’s challenges to these rulings, but that may change in the near future.
There are also pending cases in Alaska, Nevada, New York, Texas, South Carolina, and other states that could rule on similar arguments. Additionally, several states have voluntarily dismissed their lawsuits against Trump.
Click here to read more from The Washington Examiner.
How have other states, such as New Jersey and New York, previously prevented Trump from appearing on the presidential ballot?
Ent Trump from appearing on the ballot in the upcoming presidential election. The lawsuit alleges that Trump’s actions leading up to the January 6th Capitol insurrection constitute sedition and that he should be disqualified from seeking any public office, including the presidency.
Trump’s legal battle in Oregon is not his first. Just last month, the former president was barred from appearing on the 2024 presidential ballot in New Jersey and New York. In New Jersey, the decision came after a bipartisan group of lawmakers introduced a bill specifically targeting Trump, requiring presidential candidates to release their tax returns for the preceding five years. Trump, who famously refused to release his tax returns during his presidential campaign and throughout his time in office, did not comply with this requirement. As a result, his name was excluded from the ballot.
A similar situation arose in New York, where a state law was passed requiring presidential candidates to disclose their tax returns in order to appear on the ballot. Once again, Trump’s refusal to release his tax returns meant that he was prevented from being included as a candidate in the state.
Now, facing another legal challenge in Oregon, Trump finds himself in a precarious position. The lawsuit alleges that Trump’s role in inciting and encouraging the violence that occurred at the Capitol on January 6th disqualifies him from holding any public office, including the presidency. The plaintiffs argue that sedition, which is defined as conduct or speech inciting rebellion against the authority of the state, is a disqualifying offense.
This legal battle raises important questions about the qualifications necessary for individuals seeking public office. While Trump’s supporters argue that he still has a strong base of followers who believe in his policies and leadership, opponents counter that his actions and rhetoric have undermined democratic institutions and incited violence. The lawsuit in Oregon provides an opportunity for the courts to weigh in on these concerns and decide whether Trump should be allowed to appear on the state’s presidential ballot.
Regardless of the outcome, this legal battle highlights the divide in American society and the ongoing repercussions of the events of January 6th. It serves as a reminder that the consequences of those actions are still being grappled with and that the fight for accountability and justice is far from over.
As Trump fights to secure a spot on the Oregon ballot, his legal challenges reflect the broader challenges faced by the Republican Party. The party is currently grappling with how to move forward after the Trump presidency and navigate the conflicting forces within its ranks. This legal battle may very well set a precedent for the party’s future and impact its ability to unify and move beyond the controversies of the past.
As the legal battle in Oregon unfolds, the nation watches closely, recognizing the significance of this case for the future of American politics. The outcome will not only determine Trump’s presence on the Oregon ballot but also have wider implications for the country’s democracy and the role of accountability in its political system.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
