New Zealand Parliament suspends 3 Maori lawmakers for haka protest
On June 5,2025,the New Zealand Parliament imposed record suspensions on three Māori lawmakers from the Māori Party who performed a haka protest against a proposed law they believed would undermine Indigenous rights. Hana-Rāwhiti Maipi-Clarke received a seven-day suspension, while her party leaders, Debbie Ngarewa-Packer and Rawiri Waititi, were banned for 21 days. This decision came after the lawmakers confronted their opponents in the chamber, which was deemed disruptive by a parliamentary committee.
maipi-Clarke argued the punishments were excessively harsh and discriminatory, highlighting past instances where lawmakers faced no repercussions for similar actions. The protest haka aimed to challenge a controversial bill that sought to alter principles of the Treaty of Waitangi, a foundational document for Māori rights in New Zealand. The law was defeated following widespread protests, but the debate surrounding the suspensions raised significant questions about cultural expression, race relations, and parliamentary decorum in New Zealand.
The penalties were approved primarily along party lines, with government members supporting the suspensions while the opposition disagreed, indicating a broader tension over the treatment of Māori lawmakers and their role within the parliamentary system.
New Zealand Parliament suspends 3 Maori lawmakers for haka protest
New Zealand legislators voted Thursday to enact record suspensions from Parliament for three lawmakers who performed a Māori haka to protest a proposed law.
Hana-Rāwhiti Maipi-Clarke received a seven-day ban and the leaders of her political party, Debbie Ngarewa-Packer and Rawiri Waititi, were barred for 21 days. Three days had been the longest ban for a lawmaker from New Zealand’s Parliament before.
The lawmakers from Te Pāti Māori, the Māori Party, performed the haka, a chanting dance of challenge, in November to oppose a widely unpopular bill, now defeated, that they said would reverse Indigenous rights.
The protest drew global headlines and provoked months of fraught debate among lawmakers about what the consequences for the lawmakers’ actions should be and the place of Māori culture in Parliament.
Why the punishment was so strict
A committee of the lawmakers’ peers in April recommended the lengthy bans. It said the lawmakers were not being punished for the haka, but for striding across the floor of the debating chamber toward their opponents while doing it.
Judith Collins, the committee chair, said the lawmakers’ behavior was egregious, disruptive and potentially intimidating.
Maipi-Clarke, 22, rejected that description Thursday, citing other instances when legislators have left their seats and approached opponents without sanction. The suspended legislators said they are being treated more harshly than others because they are Māori.
“I came into this house to give a voice to the voiceless. Is that the real issue here?” Maipi-Clarke asked Parliament. “Is that the real intimidation here? Are our voices too loud for this house?”
Why this haka was controversial
Inside and outside Parliament, the haka has increasingly been welcomed as an important part of New Zealand life. The sacred chant can be a challenge to the viewer but is not violent.
As Māori language and culture have become part of mainstream New Zealand in recent years, haka appear in a range of cultural, somber and celebratory settings. They also have rung out in Parliament to welcome the passage of high-profile laws.
Some who decried the protest haka in Parliament cited its timing, with Maipi-Clarke beginning the chant as votes were being tallied and causing a brief suspension of proceedings. She has privately apologized for the disruption to Parliament’s Speaker, she said Thursday.
A few lawmakers urged their peers to consider rewriting rules about what lawmakers could do in Parliament to recognize Māori cultural protocols as accepted forms of protest. One cited changes to allow breastfeeding in the debating chamber as evidence the institution had amended rules before.
Who approved the suspensions
Normally the parliamentary committee that decides on punishments for errant lawmakers is in agreement on what should happen to them. But panel members were sharply divided over the haka protest and the lengthy punishments were advanced only because the government has more legislators in Parliament than the opposition.
One party in the government bloc wanted even longer suspensions and had asked the committee if the Māori party lawmakers could be jailed. Most in opposition rejected any punishment beyond the one-day ban Maipi-Clarke already served.
Speaker Gerry Brownlee urged lawmakers last month to negotiate a consensus and ordered a free-ranging debate that would continue until all agreed to put the sanctions to a vote. But no such accord was reached after hours of occasionally emotional speeches in which opposition lawmakers accused the government of undermining democracy by passing such a severe punishment on its opponents.
While the bans were certain to pass, even as the debate began Thursday it remained unclear whether opposition lawmakers would filibuster to prevent the suspensions from reaching a vote. By evening, with no one’s mind changed, all lawmakers agreed the debate should end.
Every government lawmaker voted for the punishments, while all opposition members voted against them.
NEW ZEALAND BILL WOULD LEGALLY DEFINE ‘WOMEN’ AS ‘BIOLOGICAL FEMALE’: ‘WIN FOR COMMON SENSE’
The law that prompted the protest
Thursday’s debate capped a fraught episode for race relations in New Zealand, beginning with the controversial bill that the Māori Party lawmakers opposed.
The measures would have rewritten principles in the country’s founding document, a treaty between Māori tribal leaders and representatives of the British Crown signed at the time New Zealand was colonized.
The bill’s authors were chagrined by moves from Parliament and the courts in recent decades to enshrine the Treaty of Waitangi’s promises. Opponents warned of constitutional crisis if the law was passed and tens of thousands of people marched to Parliament last November to oppose it.
Despite growing recognition for the treaty, Māori remain disadvantaged on most social and economic metrics compared to non-Māori New Zealanders.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
