The federalist

Catholic all-women’s school now accepting men


On November‌ 21, a groundbreaking announcement was made by the student newspaper serving Saint Mary’s‍ College ‍and the University of Notre Dame. Saint ⁣Mary’s, a Catholic women’s college founded in 1844, will now consider admission for applicants “whose​ sex is female or who⁣ consistently ⁣live and identify as women.”‌ This‍ decision marks a significant shift for the college, which had proudly maintained ‍its single-sex identity for decades.

The article reveals ⁤that the board of trustees voted on this policy change during their June 23 meeting. Interestingly,⁢ the announcement was sent ​out ‍after business hours on ‌November 21, just two days before Thanksgiving ​when most of the campus ⁣would ⁤have already left for the holiday. It’s worth noting that this news comes shortly⁣ after the fall phone-a-thon campaign and the final Notre Dame football game, both of which attract a large number of alumnae to South Bend.

Unsurprisingly, the decision ‌faced immediate backlash​ from alumnae. The college’s social‌ media posts were flooded with⁣ comments⁣ from angry students, parents, and alumnae, prompting the disabling of commenting and ⁤the ⁢disappearance of​ a Change.org petition that had been​ gaining traction.​ It⁢ seems that ‌the college​ is​ now shying away from free inquiry,⁢ scientific facts, and the teachings‍ of the ​church regarding gender.

In February 2022, I​ wrote ⁤an article predicting the future of my alma mater,⁢ Saint Mary’s College. ⁤I foresaw two possibilities: either the college would rebrand ‌itself as a “College for People with Uteruses,” or it would ⁢open admission to anyone claiming to be a woman,⁤ regardless of biology. Sadly, my prediction has come true, and it ‌breaks my heart. ‍The class⁢ ring that once symbolized my cherished memories now fills me with sorrow. The ⁤institution that taught me to seek truth​ and uphold ⁤objectivity has turned its back‌ on reality.

The Role of the College President

In 1986, ​there were 107 women’s colleges ⁤ in ‍the United States. Today, there are fewer than 30, and most of them have adopted transgender​ policies that essentially make them coeducational. It is disheartening to witness secular‍ institutions, such as Smith, Wellesley,⁣ and Agnes Scott, admit mentally ill men who⁤ identify as women.‌ However, it is even more gut-wrenching ‌to​ see a Roman ⁢Catholic institution, sponsored by religious sisters, ​follow‌ suit.

Saint Mary’s College President Katie⁢ Conboy justified the decision‌ by stating that the college is not the first Catholic ⁤women’s college to adopt⁣ such a⁢ policy. She⁣ pointed to Minnesota’s College of Saint Benedict as an example. However, instead‍ of standing as a leader in higher education and boldly proclaiming the truth about gender, Conboy has chosen to follow the path of others. She cited Pope Francis’ call for love and inclusivity as⁢ the driving ‍force behind the decision, but she seems to have ⁢overlooked the Pope’s warning about the dangers of gender ideology and its ⁤blurring of distinctions between men and women.

The Catholic ​intellectual tradition emphasizes the use of transcendentals, ‌such as truth, goodness, and beauty, to evaluate subjects.⁢ These timeless attributes ⁢reflect the⁤ divine origin of creation and the unity of truth and reality‌ in God. They are‍ intrinsic to ​our nature and common humanity,⁣ transcending divisions based on sex, race, or socioeconomic class. Unfortunately, these transcendentals are‍ despised by leftists. Gender ideology, which contradicts ⁤reality, stands in direct opposition to the pursuit ⁢of truth.⁤ Those who dare ⁢to challenge‌ it are labeled⁢ as bigots.


rnrn

What are the concerns raised by the timing and manner of the ‍announcement regarding transparency and accountability at Saint Mary’s College?

‍ Stitutions, ‌such as Saint ⁣Mary’s ⁢College, succumbing to societal pressures and abandoning their foundational principles.

The ⁤decision to admit applicants based on their self-identification as women, rather than ​their⁤ biological​ sex, is a departure from the long-standing tradition of single-sex education at Saint Mary’s. This change, approved by the board of trustees, signifies⁣ a significant shift⁢ in the college’s identity and ​mission.

However, the timing and manner of the announcement raise questions about transparency and accountability. The decision was quietly made during a ‍meeting ‍in June, and the news was ⁢released just before a major holiday when most of the ‌campus community had already left. This ‍raises concerns about whether the​ college intentionally tried to minimize ‌public scrutiny⁤ and opposition.

Unsurprisingly, the ​decision faced immediate backlash from alumnae who cherished the college’s original mission. Social media channels were ⁢inundated with comments from angry students, parents, and alumnae, leading to the disabling of comments on official posts and the disappearance of a Change.org petition ​that had gained momentum. This reaction indicates that the college may have inadvertently silenced dissenting voices ​and avoided​ engaging in open dialogue.

As an alumna of Saint Mary’s College, I am disheartened by the direction the institution has taken. In a previous article, I predicted two possible scenarios for the future of my ⁤alma mater: rebranding as a “College for⁢ People with Uteruses” or opening admission to anyone‌ claiming to ⁣be a woman, regardless of biology. Unfortunately, my prediction has now become a reality, ⁢and it deeply saddens me.

The cherished memories encapsulated in the class ring I once proudly wore ⁢now fill ⁢me with sorrow. The institution that once taught me to pursue truth and uphold objectivity has seemingly turned its back on reality. By disregarding scientific ⁢facts and the teachings of the church regarding gender, the college is undermining⁤ its commitment⁣ to fostering ⁣intellectual⁢ rigor and critical thinking.

This raises broader concerns⁣ about the state ​of women’s colleges in the ⁤United States. Throughout ⁢the years, women’s colleges have experienced dwindling numbers, with fewer ⁤than 30 remaining today. Many of ⁢these institutions have chosen to adopt ‍transgender policies that blur the distinction between male and female, effectively making them coeducational. This​ trend is distressing for those who believe in the unique benefits provided ⁤by single-sex education.

While it is crucial to foster inclusivity and provide⁣ educational opportunities to individuals of diverse backgrounds, it is equally important to preserve the distinct⁢ advantages offered by single-sex institutions. Women’s ‍colleges ​have historically empowered women academically, socially, and professionally, providing spaces where ⁢they can develop leadership skills, forge⁣ lifelong connections, and combat gender inequities. By diluting their ⁣unique identity, these colleges risk losing the very essence that ​has made them transformative spaces for women.

In conclusion, the recent decision by ⁣Saint Mary’s College to‍ admit applicants based on self-identification as ⁣women represents a significant departure from its single-sex tradition. ‍The timing and manner ​of the announcement raise concerns about‍ transparency and engagement with dissenting voices. As an alumna, I am saddened by this turn of events and worry about ‌the erosion of women’s colleges as a whole. It is crucial that⁤ we continue‍ to value and‍ support these institutions, ⁣recognizing ​the enduring importance of single-sex education ⁤in empowering women and shaping future generations.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker