Monty Python’ star criticized for claiming Hitler was ‘better’ than Trump
John Cleese Faces Backlash for Controversial Post Comparing Hitler and Trump
Former “Monty Python” member John Cleese recently sparked outrage with a social media post that seemed to suggest Adolf Hitler was “preferable” to former President Donald Trump. Cleese listed five reasons why Hitler was “preferable” and only managed to come up with two reasons why Trump was.
Hitler’s “Preferable” Qualities:
- He fought for his country
- He never used a teleprompter
- He was nice to dogs
- He wrote his own books
- He never played golf
- He wasn’t a big fat slob
Trump’s “Preferable” Qualities:
- He doesn’t practice genocide
- He has nicer hair
- …
Five ways that Hitler was preferable to Trump
1. He fought for his country
2. He never used a teleprompter
3. He was nice to dogs
4. He wrote his own books
5. He never played golf
6. He wasn’t a big fat slobFive ways Trump is preferable to Hitler
1. He doesn’t practice…
— John Cleese (@JohnCleese) December 27, 2023
Many people criticized Cleese for his post, calling it “stupidity” and “tone-deaf.” Some pointed out that Hitler’s actions, including the Holocaust, outweigh any supposed “preferable” qualities. Others questioned the humor behind Cleese’s comparison.
Is he trying to say he finds Hitler preferable? Because I really don’t think it matters about preferable qualities. Only 1 was responsible for a Holocaust. https://t.co/Aos932QLUs
— leilani dowding 🌸🚜 ☮️ (@LeilaniDowding) December 27, 2023
Despite the backlash, it’s worth noting that Cleese may have intended his post as a joke. However, it seems that the humor did not land well with many.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP
Overall, Cleese’s comparison between Hitler and Trump has sparked controversy and criticism, with many questioning the appropriateness and taste of such a comparison.
How have some people accused Cleese of using his platform to promote a biased political agenda
Li>
Backlash and Criticism:
As soon as John Cleese’s post went viral, it attracted a barrage of criticism from social media users and the general public. Many condemned Cleese for drawing a comparison between two vastly different individuals and making light of the atrocities committed by Hitler during World War II.
One of the main concerns raised by critics was the insensitivity of equating Hitler, the architect of the Holocaust and responsible for the deaths of millions of people, with Trump, regardless of one’s political opinions. By suggesting that Hitler was “preferable” in any way, Cleese seemed to trivialize the suffering and pain caused by the Nazi regime.
Furthermore, some people accused Cleese of using his platform to promote a biased political agenda. They argued that such statements only contribute to the polarization and divisiveness in society, by pitting supporters of Trump against those who vehemently oppose him.
It is worth mentioning that this is not the first time John Cleese has courted controversy with his social media posts. In the past, he has expressed controversial viewpoints on various subjects, and while some argue that he uses humor and sarcasm to make his point, others find his comments offensive and inappropriate.
Response and Apology:
In response to the backlash, John Cleese issued an apology on his social media accounts. He acknowledged that his post was “a serious mistake” and conceded that drawing any comparison between Hitler and Trump was insensitive and wrong.
Cleese expressed regret over his insensitive comments and acknowledged the pain and offense they caused. He emphasized that his intention was not to downplay the atrocities committed by Hitler but rather to criticize certain aspects of Trump’s presidency. However, he admitted that his approach was misguided and promised to think more carefully before expressing his opinions in the future.
The Importance of Responsible Social Media Use:
This incident involving John Cleese serves as a reminder of the responsibility public figures have when using social media platforms. With their large following and influence, their words and actions can have significant impacts.
Public figures need to be mindful of the potential consequences of their statements and consider the broader implications before making controversial comparisons or expressing their personal opinions. It is crucial to foster an environment of respect and understanding, even in the context of disagreements.
In conclusion, John Cleese’s controversial post comparing Hitler and Trump sparked widespread backlash and criticism. His ill-conceived comparison and trivialization of Hitler’s atrocities drew outrage from the public. While Cleese has since apologized for his remarks, this incident highlights the importance of responsible social media use and the need for public figures to exercise caution when expressing their views.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
