Gaetz warns Congress: “No support for Bud Light” after Jordan’s step back.
Republican Rep. Jim Jordan Fails to Secure Speakership Votes
After failing twice to secure the necessary votes to become the Speaker of the House, Republican Rep. Jim Jordan has proposed putting a third vote on hold. In the meantime, he has endorsed the idea of temporarily expanding the powers of Speaker Pro Tempore Patrick McHenry to keep the House functioning until a new speaker can be elected.
However, this idea has not been well-received by the man who initially sided with House Democrats to remove former Speaker Kevin McCarthy. In a video posted on X, Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz criticized Jordan’s endorsement, calling it a “constitutional desecration.”
Gaetz expressed his opposition to granting McHenry additional powers, stating that it goes against the constitutional process of electing a speaker. He emphasized the need to stay until a speaker is elected and if someone cannot gather enough votes, the House should move on to the next candidate. Gaetz vowed to do everything in his power to prevent the empowerment of a temporary speaker.
Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) on resolution to empower Speaker Pro Tempore McHenry: “I am against speaker-light, I am against Bud Light, I believe it is a constitutional desecration not to elect a speaker of the House” and continued to say he would do anything in his power to stop it. pic.twitter.com/qd8smDIWuZ
— CSPAN (@cspan) October 19, 2023
Despite Jordan’s support for granting McHenry temporary additional powers, there are others who oppose this move. According to The Hill, three Republicans, Tim Burchett, Pat Fallon, and Scott Perry, have already voiced their disagreement with the proposal.
McHenry, who voted for Jordan in both ballots and has consistently resisted becoming speaker, would have most of the same powers as an elected speaker but would not be in the line of presidential succession. His role would be temporary, likely lasting for 90 days.
However, for this proposal to succeed, House Republicans would likely need support from some Democratic members, and what those Democrats would demand in return remains uncertain.
Overall, the division among House Republicans and the opposition from Democrats make the path to electing a new speaker challenging.
The post Matt Gaetz Issues Warning to Congress After Jordan Steps Back: ‘I Don’t Support Bud Light’ appeared first on The Western Journal.
How does the differing views on the role of the Speaker of the House contribute to the ongoing struggle within the Republican Party?
He importance of following the established protocols, and expressed concern over the potential implications of deviating from these procedures.
The disagreement between Jordan and Gaetz stems from the differing views on the role of the Speaker of the House and the process of electing a new speaker. Jordan, who has been actively seeking the position, believes that the House needs a leader to ensure its smooth functionality during this transitional period. He argues that expanding McHenry’s powers would be a practical solution to avoid any disruptions in the legislative process.
On the other hand, Gaetz, while acknowledging the need for a functioning House, emphasizes the constitutional process of electing a new speaker. He believes that deviating from this process would undermine the principles of democracy and potentially set a dangerous precedent for future speaker elections.
This difference in perspective highlights the ongoing struggle within the Republican Party to find a unified vision and approach towards leadership. With Jordan’s failed attempts to secure the necessary votes, it is apparent that there is a division within the party regarding the choice of the next Speaker of the House.
The role of the Speaker of the House is crucial in American politics. The speaker not only presides over the House but also plays a pivotal role in shaping the legislative agenda and maintaining order within the chamber. The position holds significant power and influence, making the process of electing a new speaker a matter of great importance.
As Jordan puts his third vote on hold and endorses the idea of temporarily expanding McHenry’s powers, it is still unclear how this disagreement within the Republican Party will be resolved. The decision on the next Speaker of the House will have far-reaching implications for the party’s future direction and its ability to effectively advance its agenda.
In conclusion, Republican Rep. Jim Jordan’s failure to secure the necessary votes to become the Speaker of the House has led to an impasse within the party. Jordan’s proposal to temporarily expand the powers of Speaker Pro Tempore Patrick McHenry has been met with opposition from Rep. Matt Gaetz, who argues that it goes against the constitutional process of electing a speaker. This disagreement highlights the ongoing struggle within the Republican Party to find a unified vision and approach towards leadership. The decision on the next Speaker of the House will have significant implications and may shape the future direction of the party.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...