Left-Wing Resistance to Natural Law Stems from Its Role as a Definitive Shield Against Oppression

Politico’s Heidi Przybyla⁣ spotlighted a⁣ contentious belief within the GOP on MSNBC, coining ‍it as​ “Christian ⁢nationalism.” She illustrated her point by‍ saying, “Christian nationalists are united in ⁣the conviction that​ our human ​rights, our American freedoms, aren’t granted by any government entity. ⁤They assert ​that our‌ entitlements, encompassing everything from⁤ free speech to life itself, are blessings directly from God.”

Yet, this⁤ description does more ⁤than challenge a political ideology; it misunderstands the essence of America’s origin and constitutional framework. ‌The United⁤ States’ inception was forged on principles⁢ recognized in the Declaration of ⁤Independence, famously mentioning “the⁢ laws of​ Nature and of Nature’s God” as the basis for declaring self-evident truths about equality and inalienable rights.

This grand ‍document’s vision‍ is further entrenched in our Constitution, ‌which delineates a government’s role: to guard these⁢ divine liberties. The First Amendment’s ​ironclad defense of ⁣religious freedom pays homage to the belief‍ that our rights are God-ordained. Our ⁤nation’s roots are ⁣deeply entwined with this truth, hence all other ⁢constitutional doctrines spring from this fundamental tenet.

By Przybyla’s definition, if believing God⁣ instead⁢ of government grants rights makes one a Christian nationalist, then ​this term would⁤ encompass every founding father and indeed, most past‌ presidents. Przybyla’s commentary inadvertently suggests that rights are either divine gifts ⁣or government handouts, raising a precarious implication: if government endows rights,⁣ it can also⁢ retract⁢ them.

Current political maneuvers seem ⁢to edge towards redefining our rights—from divine ‍providence to ‍state-given permissions. And this isn’t lost ‍on those observing​ the transformation of public discourse and policy.

The Act‌ of Mislabeling

It’s a common play—the⁣ left frequently attributes their⁣ own tactics ⁢to conservatives, creating ‍an‌ echo‌ chamber of ⁤misdirection. Their outcry against the⁢ so-called “Christian nationalism” is a clear instance of​ such a strategy.

In ⁣attempting ‌to sideline Christianity, the⁤ left isn’t‌ just promoting an alternate ideology; they’re endorsing a secular doctrine as ​a stand-in for religious faith. Their ​gospel? One not of hope or redemption, but of ⁢acrimony and division—a creed ⁢that fosters disparity rather than unity.

The Bedrock of Liberty

The⁢ cornerstone belief in divine rights paved the way for America’s inception and guided pivotal movements in history. This conviction emancipated​ slaves, propelled ‍civil rights milestones, and helped liberate nations from despotism throughout the 20th century. It stands in stark contrast⁣ to every ⁢oppressive regime that has ever⁤ tried to crush human dignity and freedom under the pretense that rights are⁣ bestowed by rulers, not a higher authority.

To endorse an America where our natural rights stem from a supreme Creator is to take a stand against the very tyranny we’ve vowed to repel. If ⁢that’s the foundation of so-called Christian nationalism, then it bears the‌ true ​hallmark ⁣of‍ American heritage and merits ⁤not scorn, but solidarity.