Lawmakers and veterans claim ‘woke diversity initiatives’ waste taxpayer money and harm military
A Growing Concern: Progressive Ideology in the U.S. Military Sparks Outrage
A Congressional hearing has become the epicenter of a heated debate surrounding progressive ideology on race and gender within the U.S. military. Critics argue that this ideology is infiltrating the ranks, wasting taxpayer dollars, damaging morale, dividing troops, and hindering recruitment.
The Risks of Progressive Ideologies in the U.S. Military
The Subcommittee on National Security, the Border, and Foreign Affairs recently hosted a hearing titled “The Risks of Progressive Ideologies in the U.S. Military.” During the hearing, lawmakers and veterans highlighted examples of ideological influence in the military, such as DOD-funded drag shows and training on topics like white privilege and pronoun usage.
Matthew Lohmeier, a former lieutenant colonel for the U.S. Space Force, expressed his concerns at the hearing, stating, “Service members who wear the uniform of their country do not want to see these things in the military workplace or at their bases. There are few things taxpayers such as myself feel is less essential to the mission of our military than expanding diversity mandates and indoctrination.”
The financial implications of these initiatives are significant. The Pentagon leadership has requested $140 million from Congress to support “woke diversity initiatives” in fiscal year 2024, a substantial increase from previous years.
During the hearing, U.S. Rep. Mike Waltz criticized authors of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion materials who have taught at the Air Force academy. He argued that their claim that “if you are white, you are incapable of not being racist” is itself racist and divisive.
Data presented by Lohmeier revealed that 62% of active-duty military members believe the military has become politicized, and 65% said they would discourage their own children from joining. These figures are alarming, especially considering the Defense Department’s recruiting crisis, as it fell short of its last fiscal year recruiting goal by 41,000.
U.S. Rep. Chip Roy and Sen. Marco Rubio released a report highlighting further examples of progressive ideology within the military. The report emphasized the discrepancy in disciplinary actions, with conservatives facing consequences while those espousing progressive views are left untouched.
“Meanwhile, when a U.S. Army chaplain celebrated the overturning of Roe v Wade in an email to his unit, he was placed under investigation. This contrasts with the lack of consequences for those promoting progressive ideologies,” the report stated.
The debate over progressive ideology played a significant role in the passage of the National Defense Authorization Act. Notably, a provision that would have prohibited the teaching of critical race theory by the Department of Defense Education Activity was removed.
The report by Roy and Rubio also highlighted concerning incidents within DODEA, including the appointment of Kelisa Wing as Chief Diversity Equity and Inclusivity (DEI) Officer. Wing’s past tweets, which included derogatory language towards white individuals, raised eyebrows.
Lohmeier concluded his testimony by stating, “There’s been an overt politicization of the military workplace and the forcing of trainings that are anti-American, that criticize our founding fathers, that allege that white supremacy is a problem within the military ranks which has never been proven. All of that rhetoric that occurred when Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin took office led to a significant amount of discontent among our service members.”
How does the push for progressive ideology within the military affect morale and cohesion among service members?
Erogatory language and training programs are not the only concerns raised at the hearing. Many critics argue that the push for progressive ideology is damaging morale and cohesion within the military ranks. They claim that instead of focusing on building a strong and unified military force, resources are being diverted towards social justice initiatives that do not directly contribute to national security. This, they argue, not only undermines military readiness but also jeopardizes the safety of our nation.
Furthermore, some argue that the emphasis on progressive ideology is dividing troops along political and ideological lines. The military has traditionally been an apolitical institution, with service members expected to put aside their personal beliefs in service of a common mission. However, the increasing emphasis on progressive values is making it difficult for service members with differing viewpoints to feel comfortable expressing their opinions, potentially leading to a breakdown in unit cohesion.
Another concerning aspect is the impact on recruitment. The military relies on enlisting a diverse pool of individuals from all backgrounds who are motivated by a sense of duty and a desire to protect their country. However, the push for progressive ideology may deter those who do not align with these beliefs from joining the military. This could result in a narrower talent pool and a less diverse and representative force, ultimately weakening our national defense capabilities.
Critics argue that it is essential to refocus on the core mission of the military: to defend the nation and ensure the safety and security of its citizens. While diversity and inclusion are important goals, they should not be prioritized over military readiness and effectiveness. There is a need to strike a balance between promoting diversity and maintaining a strong and cohesive fighting force.
In conclusion, the infiltration of progressive ideology in the U.S. military has sparked outrage and raised numerous concerns. Critics argue that it is diverting resources, damaging morale, dividing troops, and hindering recruitment. While diversity and inclusion are important, they should not take precedence over military readiness and national security. It is crucial to address these concerns and ensure that our military remains a strong and unified force dedicated to protecting the nation.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
