Katie Porter insists her California Senate primary loss was a result of a ‘rigged’ election
Rep. Katie Porter Stands Firm: California Senatorial Primary “Rigged” by Billionaires
Rep. Katie Porter (D-CA) is not shying away from her claim that the California senatorial primary was ”rigged” after she failed to advance on Super Tuesday. In a bold social media post, Porter placed the blame squarely on billionaires who interfered in the race.
“‘Rigged’ means manipulated by dishonest means,” Porter wrote. “A few billionaires spent $10 million+ on attack ads against me, including an ad rated ‘false’ by an independent fact checker. That is dishonest means to manipulate an outcome.”
These comments sparked immediate backlash from fellow Democrats, including Sen. Brian Schatz (D-HI), who insisted that the election was not rigged. However, Porter stood her ground.
“I said ‘rigged by billionaires’ and our politics are—in fact—manipulated by big dark money,” Porter continued. “Defending democracy means calling that out. At no time have I ever undermined the vote count and election process in CA, which are beyond reproach.”
This statement comes less than 24 hours after Porter initially accused her detractors, particularly the cryptocurrency-focused super PAC Fairshake, of rigging the election. Her words echoed former President Donald Trump’s claims following his loss in the 2020 election.
“Thank you to everyone who supported our campaign and voted to shake up the status quo in Washington,” the California Democrat expressed. “Because of you, we had the establishment running scared — withstanding 3 to 1 in TV spending and an onslaught of billionaires spending millions to rig this election.”
Despite three House Democrats competing to replace the late Sen. Dianne Feinstein, only Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) advanced to the general election in November. Porter and fellow progressive Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA) lost their primary bids to Republican and former Los Angeles Dodger Steve Garvey.
Schiff secured 33.3% of the vote, while Garvey won 32.3%. Porter came in third place with 13.9%, followed by Lee at 7.5%, with 53% of the ballots counted.
Both Porter and Lee’s congressional terms will end in January 2025, while Schiff is poised to become the next senator for the reliably blue Golden State.
In a strategic move, Schiff, backed by former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), spent millions supporting Garvey, effectively blocking Porter from appearing on the November ballot. This move saves Democrats from having to spend millions on a Senate race, as Schiff now faces off against a Republican for the seat.
Read More from The Washington Examiner:
Click here to read more from The Washington Examiner.
How do Porter’s remarks and Bernie Sanders’ concerns raise questions about the fairness and integrity of the electoral process
“I stand by my statement,” Porter said in an interview with CNN. “When a small group of billionaires can spend millions of dollars to distort the truth and manipulate the outcome of an election, then it is indeed rigged.”
Porter’s remarks highlight a growing concern among progressives regarding the influence of money in politics. Many believe that the immense wealth of a few individuals allows them to exert disproportionate influence on the democratic process, potentially undermining the will of the people.
While the impact of money on elections is not a new issue, it has become even more pronounced in recent years. The Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision in 2010 opened the floodgates for unlimited campaign spending by corporations and wealthy individuals. This has led to an influx of money into political campaigns, often with little transparency or accountability.
Porter’s case is particularly interesting as she is not the only candidate to suggest that the primary was rigged. Former presidential candidate Bernie Sanders has also voiced similar concerns, citing the influence of wealthy donors and super PACs. This raises questions about the fairness and integrity of the electoral process, especially in a system that claims to prioritize the voice of the people.
The role of money in politics is a complex issue with no easy solutions. Some argue that campaign finance reform is necessary to level the playing field and ensure that all candidates have equal opportunities to compete. Others believe that the current system is inevitable and that the focus should be on educating voters about the sources of campaign funding and encouraging them to be more discerning in their choices.
Regardless of one’s position on the issue, Porter’s bold stance sends a powerful message. By refusing to back down and holding billionaires accountable for their actions, she is standing up for the principles of democracy and fairness. Her willingness to challenge the status quo and speak out against powerful interests is commendable and should be applauded.
In the wake of Porter’s claims, there have been renewed calls for greater transparency in campaign financing. Many believe that the public has a right to know who is funding political campaigns and how their money is being used. This information is crucial for voters to make informed choices and hold candidates accountable.
The California senatorial primary may have come and gone, but the debate over the influence of money in politics continues. Porter’s bold stance serves as a reminder that the fight for a fair and transparent electoral system is far from over. As citizens, it is essential that we remain vigilant and hold our elected officials accountable for their actions. Only then can we ensure that our democracy truly represents the will of the people.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
