Jury finds Meta and YouTube liable in landmark social media addiction case
Deprecated: str_getcsv(): the $escape parameter must be provided as its default value will change in /var/www/html/breaking-news/wp-content/plugins/wp-auto-affiliate-links/aal_engine.php on line 361
A California jury found Meta (Instagram and Facebook) and YouTube liable in a landmark social media addiction case filed in los Angeles Superior Court. The trial centered on a 19-year-old plaintiff who alleged that excessive use of these platforms contributed to depression and suicidal thoughts. Meta and YouTube’s executives defended thier safety measures for younger users, while Snap and TikTok settled before the trial, leaving Meta and YouTube to face possible damages. The ruling is viewed as a potential sign of how future suits over social media addiction could proceed, drawing comparisons to past tobacco litigation.The decision followed a seperate New Mexico case in which Meta was ordered to pay $375 million for failing to disclose risks to minors; broader concerns about social media’s impact on youth have also prompted calls for warnings and stricter safeguards.
Jury finds Meta and YouTube liable in landmark social media addiction case
Meta and YouTube were found liable on Wednesday in a landmark social media addiction trial in a California state court.
The ruling by a jury on the Los Angeles Superior Court found the parent companies of the social media platforms Instagram, Facebook, and YouTube negligent, per Sky News.
The case, which unfolded through several weeks of proceedings at trial and days of jury deliberation, centered on claims from a 19-year-old, identified only as K.G.M. in the lawsuit, who claimed she became addicted to the social media platforms, which eventually led her to have depression and suicidal thoughts. Meta, owner of Instagram and Facebook; Snap, owner of Snapchat; TikTok; and YouTube were initially slated to be on trial together, but Snap and TikTok reached settlements for undisclosed amounts just before trial, leaving only Meta and YouTube up for possible damages in this case.
During the trial, the heads of Instagram, Adam Mosseri, and Meta, Mark Zuckerberg, testified, with both defending the platforms’ safeguards for younger users.
The case in Los Angeles is widely viewed as a sign of where future lawsuits over social media addiction could go across the country. Lawyers for the teenage plaintiff compared the case to the high-profile lawsuits against tobacco companies in the 1990s over their advertising, particularly to young people, which led to significant restrictions on how those products may be marketed.
ZUCKERBERG GRILLED ON META’S TARGETING OF TEENAGERS IN SOCIAL MEDIA ADDICTION TRIAL
The ruling in Los Angeles comes a day after a jury in New Mexico ordered Meta to pay a $375 million fine for failing to disclose the risks of social media to minors, in violation of state law.
Social media platforms and their addictive qualities have been increasingly under the microscope for the past decade, with the heads of social media companies testifying before Congress and platforms making adjustments for younger users. In June 2024, then-President Joe Biden’s surgeon general, Vivek Murthy, called for a social media warning label to state that “social media is associated with significant mental health harms for adolescents.”
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
