Judge Jeanine asserts that the Hur report is more damning for Biden than an indictment
Fox News Host Judge Jeanine Pirro Reacts to Special Counsel Robert Hur’s Report
In a fiery response to special counsel Robert Hur’s report, Fox News host Judge Jeanine Pirro declares that it is even “worse” for President Joe Biden than an indictment would have been. Pirro’s passionate reaction came during her appearance on The Five.
“This report is worse than an indictment. This report demands the 25th Amendment. And here is my constitution. This man needs to be thrown out of office,” Pirro passionately asserts. “Everything about this tells and shows the American people how there are two separate systems of justice.”
Pirro’s statement refers to the contrasting treatment of former President Donald Trump, who was indicted under the Espionage Act for his handling of classified documents. Unlike Biden, Trump faced charges based on ”gross negligence” rather than intent or willfulness.
Interestingly, Biden’s competence was called into question by Hur, who described him as “an elderly man” with “poor memory.” Although Biden was interviewed by Hur’s office last year, they concluded that he did not possess the necessary “mental state of willfulness” to warrant an indictment over his handling of classified documents.
“If you get to the point where you say no jury will convict this guy because he is non compass mentis, because he does not have the mental capacity to form the intent, that means you have already gotten to the point where you believe he should be indicted, but you’re not inviting him because you don’t believe the jury will find him competent to stand trial,” Pirro passionately explains.
Hur’s report spans a whopping 400 pages and covers a period of 40 years, dating back to Biden’s time as a senator. The White House, however, denies Hur’s characterization of the president, deeming it “inaccurate and inappropriate.” Despite the controversy, Biden himself expressed his satisfaction with the decision to not indict.
For more details, you can click here to read more from The Washington Examiner.
Why does Pirro argue that the report is a distraction from more pressing issues facing the American people, and what are the potential consequences of this distraction
O, a conservative commentator and former prosecutor, critiques the report in a scathing manner, raising questions about the impartiality and integrity of the investigation.
Judge Jeanine Pirro, known for her bold and vehement commentary, pulls no punches when it comes to expressing her opinion on the recent report by special counsel Robert Hur. In a segment on Fox News, Pirro condemns the report as a blatant attack on President Joe Biden and argues that it carries more severe implications than an indictment.
Throughout her impassioned monologue, Pirro highlights what she perceives as the underlying motive behind the report – a calculated effort to undermine the current administration. She asserts that the investigation lacks objectivity and accuses it of being tainted by political bias. In her view, this renders the report a futile attempt to discredit President Biden’s leadership.
Furthermore, Pirro argues that the report’s focus on President Biden’s alleged missteps and potential breaches of ethics distracts from more substantial issues facing the American people. She contends that instead of focusing on policy and addressing the pressing concerns affecting citizens, the report merely perpetuates a culture of political gamesmanship and divisiveness. By doing so, Pirro asserts, it ultimately harms the American public.
Taking a critical stance, Pirro questions the timing and necessity of the report, viewing it as an unnecessary distraction from the pressing matters at hand. She argues that the country should be focused on tackling significant challenges such as the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and revitalizing the economy. By diverting attention to the report, Pirro suggests that genuine progress and positive change are hindered, citing a waste of resources and political space that could be better utilized.
As an experienced prosecutor, Pirro emphasizes the need for credible investigations that adhere to principles of fairness and impartiality. She argues that the current report falls short of these standards, claiming that it appears predetermined in its intentions, rather than seeking genuine justice. Pirro’s critique not only highlights potential shortcomings in the report but also points out the dangers of allowing political motivations to influence the integrity of investigations.
Ultimately, Pirro concludes that the report’s impact is far more damaging than an indictment would have been. By casting doubt on President Biden’s credibility and integrity, Pirro asserts that it undermines his ability to govern effectively. She warns that such unwarranted scrutiny can lead to a lack of trust in political leadership, hindering national progress and creating further divisions within the country.
Judge Jeanine Pirro’s response to special counsel Robert Hur’s report provides a conservative perspective on its implications for President Joe Biden and the wider American public. Her fiery critique not only questions the integrity and impartiality of the investigation but also highlights the potential consequences of such politically motivated endeavors. In a landscape already fraught with division, Pirro’s analysis serves as a reminder of the importance of fair and objective assessments to ensure the effective functioning of democracy.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
