Conservative News Daily

Trump trial judge grins like game show host as trial begins.

Judge in Trump Case Smiles Like a Game Show Host as 45’s Trial Gets Underway

It’s all a⁣ big joke to them.

Democrats, the left, and ⁤all of their allies know this is a big, sick joke, ​but it⁢ doesn’t matter. They’re going ‌to smirk in‍ your face, and you’re going to have to take it.

The ​above takeaway is the biggest takeaway from a viral clip of ⁢the​ judge presiding over one of former President Donald Trump’s many ongoing legal ⁢entanglements.

Trump and his legal team⁣ had their day in court today in Manhattan, as the former president tries to fight ​a civil suit that, effectively, claims that Trump and his family defrauded investors by overvaluing the worth of businesses and properties.

The whole stunt is being instigated by far-left Democrat and⁢ New York attorney general, Letitia James.

Presiding​ Judge Arthur‌ Engoron ruled last week that Trump did, in fact, commit fraud, per​ Fox News, with Monday’s trial meant to convince ⁤Engoron otherwise.

If a viral clip of the presiding judge is anything to go by, it’s looking bleak for Team‌ MAGA:

(If you don’t care for all the‍ fluff, you can see the‌ specific moment about 40 seconds into the clip.)

In the above clip, like ‌any self-aggrandizing movie star, Engoron noticed that the cameras, and thus the spotlight, was squarely on him.

What ⁢did Judge​ Engoron do? No, he didn’t sit sternly during the opening‌ proceedings ⁤or ⁢even bothered to exhibit an​ air of neutrality.

Engoron opted to attempt a smile, but appeared to stop just short at a smirk.

Think about ​the optics ​of that: You’re in court with the judge who is going to decide your ‍legal fate, a very serious matter that impacts American citizens and the American legal justice system every day.

Instead of treating the matter with the gravity it needed (indeed, as heavy as any legal case can be, this one involves a former president and leading GOP presidential candidate), Engoron treated the matter like a‍ conman who has found his mark.

Social media users on X, formerly Twitter, were quick to call out this “clown show.”

Making matters so much worse ​for the former president, Trump all but called that ⁣this‍ sort of charade was inevitable on Truth Social last week.

In a lengthy statement posted to his fledgling social media app on Sept.⁣ 26, Trump tore into⁤ both⁤ James and Engoron:

“I have been unfairly sued‍ by the Trump⁢ Hating‌ Democrat Attorney ​General⁣ of New York State, Letitia James, over the false fact that I inflated my Financial Statements in order to borrow​ money from Banks, etc. The Judge in the case, Arthur F.⁤ Engoron, refused to allow this case to ⁤go to the ‘Commercial Division,’ where it belongs, because he is a Trump Hater beyond even A.G James who campaigned against me game show host as trial begins.”>spewing ⁢horrible⁢ inflammatory statements

which are False & Defamatory,” Trump posted Tuesday. “I am not even allowed a Jury!”

(This civil suit trial is a non-jury trial, something Trump has unsuccessfully fought against.)

In a follow-up statement, Trump blasted Engoron as “DERANGED.”

Given that the man decided​ that the best response while sitting in court, while presiding over a very​ serious legal matter that could implicate a former sitting president, was to ​haphazardly smirk for the cameras — which, at ⁤best, could be described as inappropriate — “deranged” may not be that far off.

.author_subscription_pitch p{margin:5px;}

A Note from Our Founder:

Every morning, we at The ⁣Western Journal wake up and pursue our mission of giving you the important information you need about what’s happening in‍ America.

We can’t do that without your help.

America has been on the receiving end ⁣of false narratives. The purpose of these false narratives is⁤ to make you feel powerless. The Western Journal empowers you ⁤by breaking these false narratives.

But I wouldn’t be honest with you today if I didn’t let you‌ know that the⁢ future of The Western Journal is in jeopardy without your help.

Silicon⁣ Valley and the Big Tech tyrants have done everything they can to ⁤put The Western Journal out of business. Our faithful donors and subscribers ‍have kept us going.

If you’ve never chosen to⁣ donate, let me be honest: We need your help today.

Please don’t wait one minute. Donate right now –‌ our situation in America is dire.⁣ Our country hangs by a thread, and The Western Journal stands for truth in this difficult time.

Please stand with us by donating today.
Floyd G. Brown
Founder of ‌The Western Journal

The post Judge⁢ in Trump Case Smiles Like a Game‌ Show Host as 45’s Trial Gets Underway appeared first on The Western Journal.

Judge in Trump Case ‍Smiles⁣ Like ⁤a Game Show Host as 45’s Trial Gets Underway

The ongoing legal battle between former President Donald Trump and New York Attorney General Letitia James took an interesting‍ turn on ‌Monday⁤ as their civil fraud‍ trial began in Manhattan. However, what stood⁤ out the⁤ most from the proceedings was not the ‌legal arguments presented,

How might the judge’s smiling demeanor impact the perception of the ‍trial’s fairness and impartiality among the ‍public, and possibly the jury?

The judge’s smiling demeanor⁣ may⁣ have differing impacts on the perception of the trial’s ⁣fairness and impartiality among the public and the jury.

1. Public Perception: The judge’s smiling⁢ demeanor⁤ can be interpreted in multiple ways by the‍ public. Some members of the ‍public ⁣might perceive the judge’s smiling as ‌a ​sign of impartiality, indicating that the judge is​ approachable and open-minded. It may ⁢create ⁣a perception that the​ judge ⁢is fair and unbiased‍ in their decision-making. On​ the ​other hand, some members of⁤ the public might interpret⁤ the judge’s smiling as a‍ lack of⁢ seriousness or professionalism, ​potentially undermining the perception ⁢of the trial’s fairness. They ‌might think that the judge is⁢ not taking the proceedings seriously or not considering the gravity of‌ the case.

2. Jury Perception: The impact on the‍ jury’s​ perception can also vary. If the jury interprets the judge’s⁢ smiling ⁣demeanor as a positive⁢ signal, ⁤they might ​perceive the ‍trial as fair and impartial. They may feel‌ more at ease, fostering a positive atmosphere in the courtroom, which could ‌potentially ‌positively impact their decision-making process. However, some jurors might view the judge’s smiling as favoritism towards ⁤one party, leading to ‌doubts about the judge’s​ impartiality. In such cases, the jury’s​ perception of ​fairness may be compromised.

Ultimately, the impact of the judge’s⁣ smiling demeanor on the perception⁤ of the trial’s fairness and impartiality among⁣ the public and the jury depends on individual ⁢interpretations and cultural norms. It is critical for judges ‌to maintain an overall demeanor that conveys professionalism, impartiality, and ⁢respect ‍for the seriousness‌ of the proceedings, regardless of ‍whether they smile or not.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker