Witness claims majority of Hunter’s art sales were from Joe Biden donors
Hunter Biden’s Art Sales Linked to Donors to President Joe Biden
Hunter Biden has made over $1.5 million from selling his artwork, with a significant portion of the sales coming from two donors to his father, President Joe Biden. This revelation was shared by George Berges, the former gallerist of the first son, during closed-door testimony to House investigators. The transcript of his testimony, reviewed by the Washington Examiner, revealed that Elizabeth Naftali and Kevin Morris were the primary buyers of Hunter Biden’s art.
Elizabeth Naftali’s Purchases and Appointment
Elizabeth Naftali spent nearly $100,000 on two pieces of Hunter Biden’s artwork. Her first purchase was made shortly after Joe Biden took office, and less than five months later, she was appointed to a prestigious panel called the U.S. Commission for the Preservation of America’s Heritage Abroad by Joe Biden. Naftali made her second purchase in December of that year.
Kevin Morris’s Significant Investment
Kevin Morris, an entertainment lawyer and prominent Democratic donor, spent a staggering $875,000 on Hunter Biden’s art. He purchased the artwork through an entity called Kuliaky Art on January 19, 2023. Morris had previously seen Hunter Biden’s artwork at an exhibit and later negotiated a lump sum payment for 11 pieces. However, it was revealed that Morris only paid a portion of the $875,000 as a commission to Berges, with the rest going towards a debt owed by Hunter Biden to Morris.
Financial Support and Unusual Arrangements
Morris played a significant role in supporting Hunter Biden financially, providing loans and gifts totaling nearly $5 million starting in 2020. Berges mentioned that the arrangement between Morris and Hunter Biden was unusual, as the gallery did not write a check for the artist commission. Instead, Berges only received payment for the gallery’s portion, while the negotiation between Morris and Hunter Biden took place separately.
Identity of Buyers and White House Involvement
Berges revealed that Naftali, Morris, and his business partner William Jaques accounted for 70 percent of Hunter Biden’s art sales. Despite the White House’s claim that safeguards were in place to protect the anonymity of buyers, Hunter Biden eventually became aware of at least three of his buyers’ identities. Berges clarified that he did not disclose the buyers’ identities to Hunter Biden and that there were ten total buyers. The contracts between Berges and Hunter Biden regarding buyer anonymity were contradictory, with the second contract requiring buyers to remain anonymous.
When the White House mentioned their involvement in suggesting the second contract, Berges expressed surprise as he had not communicated with them about the agreement. Although the contract did not specify any consequences if Hunter Biden discovered the buyers’ identities, it is evident that he knew about Naftali, Morris, and Jacques purchasing his art.
Naftali’s purchase and subsequent appointment raised potential ethics concerns, as she bought Hunter Biden’s artwork before receiving the appointment. Despite the White House’s efforts to maintain anonymity, Hunter Biden’s knowledge of the buyers raises questions about conflicts of interest.
What ethical dilemmas does the controversy surrounding Hunter Biden’s art sales highlight, and what measures are being proposed to address these concerns and increase transparency in the art market
The actual payment transaction took place after Joe Biden was inaugurated as president. Despite Morris being a long-time supporter of the Democratic Party, the amount he spent on Hunter Biden’s art raises eyebrows and raises questions about possible influence or access.
Controversy Surrounding Hunter Biden’s Art Sales
The art world has historically been a subject of controversy when it comes to money laundering and bribery. The fact that Hunter Biden has no prior experience, training, or exhibition history in the art world only adds fuel to the fire. Critics argue that the high prices paid for his artworks may be more about buying influence rather than appreciating the artistic value.
The White House has been quick to defend the legitimacy of the art sales, emphasizing that the confidentiality agreement between Hunter Biden and the buyers ensures that the president and his administration have no knowledge of who is purchasing the artworks. They argue that the prices are set by the art dealer and reflect the market value based on the artist’s potential and historical sales figures.
However, many believe that the confidentiality agreement is insufficient to address concerns of potential influence peddling. The lack of transparency and the fact that the buyers are known supporters of President Biden only adds to the skepticism surrounding the art sales.
Ethical Dilemmas and Calls for More Transparency
This controversy raises important ethical dilemmas regarding the intersection of politics and art. The art market has long been a playground for the wealthy elite, allowing them to invest in artworks as a means of hiding and increasing their wealth. The potential for political donors to exploit this system for their own benefit is a serious concern for advocates of transparency and good governance.
To address these concerns, some experts and lawmakers have called for stricter regulations and transparency measures in the art market. They argue that art sales should be subject to the same scrutiny as other financial transactions, especially when they involve public figures and potential conflicts of interest.
The revelations surrounding Hunter Biden’s art sales have once again brought the issue of political influence and access to the forefront. It raises questions about the lines between personal wealth, political connections, and public office. As the debate continues, it is clear that more transparency and regulation are needed to ensure the integrity of the art market and to prevent potential abuses of power. Whether these calls for reform will be heeded remains to be seen.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
